Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Has there ever been an sr20 powered gtr?

I'm a little confused as to why no japanese tuners have ever done this, as i think an rb26 is a disadvantage especially on a track like tsukuba.

Imagine the m-speed r34 gt-r with a stroked sr20.. it would be much lighter, and i'm sure it would produce more low down grunt then an rb26, especially seeing as tho the car would be much lighter.

hell you could even use an sr20ve head to make a broader, higher revving power-band.

and if that wasnt enough you could add a roots supercharger to help the turbo spool up faster..

hks and bee-r have made kits.

whats your thoughts?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256432-sr20-gt-r/
Share on other sites

Tuning garage "Signal" in Japan put a SR20DET in a R35(V35) for pure drift setup.

I was assuming the VQ35DE was a tad peaky when drifting and spun a lot more as opposed to the SR20DET which is most popular amounst drifter...

Just guessing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256432-sr20-gt-r/#findComment-4420270
Share on other sites

Problem with that is you'd have to mate the block to a front diff.

This would be an absolute nightmare!

I too toyed with the idea of an SR in a 32 but its simply not worth it. An SR in an S13 is fine, its a light engine in a light chassis.

Skylines need the enxtra torque from a 6 banger and cc's from 25's & 26's. They are a fair bit heavier. A GTR weighs what? 1400kg?

Yes there is more weight but you need the extra poke and torque from an RB. You would have to spend a little money on an SR to keep up with a RB26.

An SR in a stripped 32 is a different story.

Thats just my veiws on it..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256432-sr20-gt-r/#findComment-4420312
Share on other sites

you can achieve better weight distribution by putting a SR into a r32. the engine bay is designed for a inline 6 so the front axles sit further from the firewall (or the firewall sits further back from the front axles, whichever way you want to put it). so by using the sr20, you get the advantage of almost a mid engined car as most of the engine sits behind the front axle.

yes the gtr is a 1400kg car, but only because of the heavy 4wd system and the iron block inline 6. drop a alloy block sr20 and ditching the 4wd system, you could get the weight right down.

the sr20 has had a lot of development as well and big useable power can be obtained.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256432-sr20-gt-r/#findComment-4421823
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Oh, that's grim. Something bad has been happening there.
    • Put an endoscope down the hole and saw this. Not quite all around the bore but a good 60% at least. Chin to the chest and towards further disappointments I guess.
    • 2 does "sort of" applies, maybe......but looking at what parts would be needed for the swap to get engineered, registered, and insured, and basically that's everything under the car, the modifications the make it legal would be problematic and horrendously expensive, all for a street car that just cruises around and hits a few twisty roads on the weekends Also, from looking at the NSW rules and Regs, with all modifications that is required just to make the car safe and not twist itself to pieces, and then actually get registered for street use, may still be impossible nowadays As for 1, when you add in a fresh engine, fresh transmission, rear cradle and diff, tailshaft, suspension, brakes, cooling, and all the other fabrication required, your probably looking at up to $100k to do it right, all for a 20 year old MX5 that is over engineered and you would never be able to actually use the power it has on the street, much like your beastie, which I love, but you actually track that thing and can use all of its powers in anger, in a safe environment  Hell, the old Bogan Cruise Ship had more power than I could use on the street, and in hindsight, I went a bit silly on that thing, it didn't really need the 500hp it had for what I actually used the car for, it was fun, but basically unusable on the street if you value your licence  As for cams, yeah, I'll probably book it in for them to get installed and tuned soonish, like next month after MX5 Mania are back at work....... and yes, I've already sent a email to bin the turbo quote and quote instead to install cams and a new Fluidampr balancer that will suit the 2.5 better than the OEM 2.0 balancer that is swapped over for the 2.5 install, as the balancer needs to get pulled to time the cams it's a while your in there sort of thing I did think a bit about flex fuel for a laugh, but being na, and no where really around locally anymore to get E85, I've binned that idea, so no sweet sweet corn smells are set for the car I wish E85 was more of a standard fuel, it's better for the environment, better for tuning, plus that sweet sweet smell we all love As for fitting in the family, that's not needed, as everyone in the family already owns a car that can seat 5 humans comfortably enough, the MX5 is "my toy" As for buying a car that is already built, nah, I would rather pick and choose my parts, I enjoy the process, and in the big picture, the additional cost is well worth the enjoyment, and the occasional frustration, I get out of doing it, albeit with other people spinning the spanners, and me, just paying the invoice 🤣
    • Excuse me, but 2) does apply 1) Would also apply if you consider how much is spent in the alternatives. Also there's the option of 3), buy one pre-built that you can put your family in (it's me, it's my car)   That said, I went on a ~500km drive the other day. I didn't use anything more adventurous than 3rd/4th gear at about ~3000RPM and 50% throttle and I was going as fast as anyone has any sense doing on a public road, with enough grip to the point where I didn't want to go any faster. I was obviously under the limit of the current car etc etc. MX5 with 2.5 N/A to achieve the same speed would be more fun for any road scenario. Maybe consider cams. I wouldn't boost it. The use case is just not there and it won't actually make the car more enjoyable unless you really do plan on wringing gears from 1st to 3rd (at least) at 100% WOT on a public road to 150+kmh.
    • Great if: 1. You had all of the money for everything else that is required  2. Lived in a country where you could actually do this and drive it legally on the road Sadly, neither applies to me As for the turbo, I am having second thoughts, mainly for engineering/registration legality reasons and insurance  Not saying I've finished doing stupid things that I probably should do to the MX5, but boost, and V8 engine swaps isn't on the cards Strange, but true 
×
×
  • Create New...