Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey umm i was contemplating buying a car with this plenum mod, but didn't buy it

Now only recently i have been speaking to this guy who is pretty switched on with flow and porting etc. Who is helping me get my car back on the road.

now when i take my engine out we are going to get the inlet manifold bead blasted, then flow matched and then they machine the hole in the plenum for the TB cos it is actually smaller. he even spoke of making it elliptical shaped something to do with flow to #1 and #6. Then the zorst manifold gets cleaned up inside the runners (die grind) and then bead blasted too (mainly all this does is drops zorst temps and relieve turbo).

Now we have decided to use one of those PWR 'Barrel' Coolers (water to air). Original idea was to rotate comp housing on turbo to face down and have the barrel mounted horizontal beside radiator. on further inspection in the S13 engine bay its gonna take some cool thinking to fit it in this position.

Then i thought why not have a front facing TB and have the barrel behind the bumper?

and in my mind it seems right, but i don't know a great deal about flow or anything but if i got the TB front mounted then had the manifold port matched and bead blasted surely it would work?

let me know otherwise i will stick with the other way and cut the shit outta my engine bay

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

this mod is spot on for rb20/25's although i would mount throttle body directly onto manifold to increase throttle response further.

there will be no lean-out in runners because,

pressure in system is equal whether at compressor outlet, intercooler or inlet runner.

compressed air reacts like liquid/hydraulics therefore if each inlet runner is of equal length and pressure is the same each runner will flow equally.

so the big gains will come from your tuner putting more fuel into the engine earlier, 2m less plumbing adds to a ton of response, reducing heat soak and increasing turbo efficency.

  • 1 year later...

Now there's lateral thinking for you - Interesting concept - How are the results RNS11Z ?? Who made the plenum ?? Looks like good work !

Conceptually, there would be good flow distribution with this type of plenum !

Well done !

Cheers,

Does anyone know what part of the stock rb25 inlet manifold makes it restrictive?

Would extrude honing the lower half and removing the odd shaped bumps in the top half benefit much?

Has anyone used a RIPS plenom yet?

PS: Aiming for 450rwhp in a 1200 kg car running a RB30DET.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And make sure the belts are tightened appropriately too.
    • They care about emissions, and cost the most. Save weight where possible, and make manufacturing easier. Less material also let's the engine transfer heat to water quicker, and bring the engine up to temp quicker, better for emissions and getting them past their warranty period.
    • I was under the impression the reason why OEMs are going with solutions like relatively thin "right-sized" cylinder walls with technologies like PTWA and open deck is because they care a lot about whatever marginal knock margin benefits they get from that vs the structural rigidity benefits of a closed deck block and thicker cylinder walls. I also see some weird stuff like plastic inserts in the water jacket around the cylinders to try and equalize cylinder wall temperatures. re: the PRP blocks and heads at the end of the day it's hard to know what is and isn't going to work there, just have to see what the initial buyers say about it.
    • Which is why I didn't mention that hardness testing, and specifically mentioned the bore and deck thickness testing. Yeah, not really. The bore temperature will be a lot more even around the top half inch or so, where the material distribution is dominated by the deck, and which is the only place where the bore surface temperature heating any gas in the cylinder is likely to have any effect on detonation. Think about it. Another inch or so down the bore, you might have a hotter spot. The gas there might get a bit hotter, then the piston rises squeezes that gas away from there at high speed and mixes it with other gas from nearby. Instant dilution of the problem. I'd be surprised if it was an issue at any time other than in racing engines or OEM dev engines being run at the ragged edge of tuning. Say what now?
    • https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-material-hardness-testing/ The PRP testing on block hardness I'm not sure how much it actually can be trusted. The thinner cylinder walls on RBs is a bit of a problem vs 2JZ but it really depends on the design goal. Siamesed cylinder bores like a 2JZ cause uneven cylinder wall temps too, which means a bit of distortion induced by that + the hotspot can affect knock margin. Something that actually gives me a bit of pause with the PRP block, whether super thick cylinder walls are going to keep it from being drop-in compatible on an otherwise OEM rebuild. 
×
×
  • Create New...