Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Man i got a GTS4 and i'm gettin a 600x300x80 that thing is tiny man go for something a smidge bigger i mean i only got Zorst, Dual Boost controler and thats it.

In this case bigger is usually better but not too big don't want too much of a pressure drop etc.

In a word - yes

It would probably be fine even if you intend going a larger turbo as well, something like a HKS2530.

the best sized cooler is one that is optimum for your hp goals - too big and you will get extra lag and a more sluggish throttle response.

going by the aftermarket coolers I have seen (not too many, so please dont take my words for gospel) a 'good' cooler of the dimensions you quote should be good for over 400bhp.

to quote http://www.horsepowerinabox.com/make_model...skyline_r33.asp

Note this isnt a Jap brand name cooler that they are talking about, but a local product. I have no reason to believe that a japanese product is going to be inferior:)

This intercooler uses an 18”x12” high by 3.5” thick bar and plate intercooler core, smooth aluminium tanks with 60mm inlet/outlet and centre mounting points make for quick easy fitment with minimal front bar trimming. The core itself is rated at optimum 580 horsepower with 1.5 PSI pressure drop at that level.  We have made up to 630 horsepower through these cores but with nearly 2.25 PSI pressure drop.  This cooler was featured in a Zoom magazine technical article where it proved to reduce air intake temps by nearly 25 degrees over the standard intercooler during testing where the car was run at 11 PSI for 15 seconds at 5000 RPM.  The standard intercooler had a pressure drop of up to 8 PSI at 7000RPM whereas this one had a mere 1 PSI drop.  

A bit of that is probably sales pitch, but I dont think it would be far enough away from the truth that it wouldnt be reasonable to expect good performance at up to 400 or 450bhp

my 0.02 anyways

Gradenko: Not too much since I'm just looking to learn how to work on the rb motors. I've already put a turbo timer and a hks exhaust on it. Looking for an intercooler and boost controller (probably greddy profec B). Changing the plugs soon but so many different opinions and I don't know what's in there right now. I checked the NGK catalog and it says 5 but then some people say 6. I don't know if to go platinum or iridium, heat range 5 or 6? I've searched many threads but still indecisive.

Madgt4: Wow, that does sound pretty large? Are you going to have too much pressure loss in that i/c? I guess that depends how efficient it is.

Steve: No, I'm not upgrading any turbos or anything. I'll probably be purchasing hks2530's from what I have read later for the R33gtr or R34gtr.

Thanks for all the advice, I'm just looking to upgrade a little and learn on this car before I purchase my R33gtr or R34gtr next year.

Anymore advice would be great. And yes, I haven't been posting much because I've been searching and reading through everything first. :(

That cooler will be just fine dude.

Your standard cooler will be fine for around 12 psi through the standard turbo.

Put it this way.

The standard size that MOST companies make there intercoolers is 600 x 300 x 70.

A standard GTR cooler is something like 600 x 270 x 70 (I think).

If TRUST has decided to make a cooler that is slightly smaller for a car that is more lightly tuned, I would buy it.

Actually, I would buy anything TRUST makes if I could..

send a PM to "rev210" asking about your intercooler....

He has run a 12 second pass in his R33 GTST with the standard cooler which is not that better than the R32's..

He'll set you straight.

Originally posted by GTST

..

send a PM to "rev210" asking about your intercooler....

He has run a 12 second pass in his R33 GTST with the standard cooler which is not that better than the R32's..

I was under the impression that he never got his 12, just low 13s??

BOOSTD managed a 12 with stock turbo, but he had a cooler.

my mistake.

still.

decent number with a standard intercooler.

My point was that rev210 is one of the guys int he thinking that the larger the intercooler is not really a better thing.

It has to be matched to your turbo and so on.

So this particular intercooler 410 x 260 x 70 made by a company like TRUST will be mroe than enough for a R32 GTS4 with a cat back exhaust as the only mod.

Actually, that intercooler would be more than enough for anything the standard turbo will be able to handle.

Thanks guys. I actually forget to say that it has a hks highflow filter but it was on there when I purchased it, not that it matters.

As I said, I just plan on putting a greddy profec b and the i/c before I get my gtr.

By the way, any suggestions on my plug situation. I'm fixing to order them. And yes, I have searched but still with so many opinions. What do you guys run on your gts'?

Thanks. I was checking those out and noticed that the BCPR6ES plugs were gapped at 0.08mm and the BCPR6ES-11 were gapped at 1.1mm (0.044"). I guess I'll be ordering a box today since I can get those for only about $3 plus shipping of course. I've checked local auto shops and they want $12-15 per plug.

:(

Seriously, I'll be ordering over the internet. So GTST, you went with "7's" since you went colder? I know NGK does it differently than others and the cold-hot is opposite. Higher number, colder the plug from NGK. I hate that when I'm ordering for my gsr because I normally get 2 steps colder.

Originally posted by GTST

my mistake.

still.

decent number with a standard intercooler.

My point was that rev210 is one of the guys int he thinking that the larger the intercooler is not really a better thing.

It has to be matched to your turbo and so on.

So this particular intercooler 410 x 260 x 70 made by a company like TRUST will be mroe than enough for a R32 GTS4 with a cat back exhaust as the only mod.

Actually, that intercooler would be more than enough for anything the standard turbo will be able to handle.

Also you forget revs car was a freak and hes been the only one able to get such a low time with stock stuff!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
×
×
  • Create New...