Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I bought my near stock r33 about 2 years ago with ~120k on the clock. Ran like clockwork for a year, only thing I needed to get was a new battery (and regular servicing of course). Then in the last year it's been falling apart! Gearbox died so I had to get that replaced and got a new clutch at the same time, had some issues with the coolant system and for the past 6+ months it has lost a heap of power and boosts like crap (not coilpacks/sparkplugs) so I'll eventually have to get that fixed too. It's really annoying because I hardly ever thrash it, wouldn't mind so much if I was actually abusing it! Then you get scum who vandilise your car so you have to pay to get that fixed because the insurance claims are too expensive. I still like my skyline though :( Just wish I could spend my money on upgrading it rather than fixing it all the time so I could take it to a track day!

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ive been looking around for a skyline atm, heard different stories from people about how costly they are to run? if im not drifting dragging etc, i dont imagine itd be more then the normal car just for little things needing replacing here and there? or am i wrong?

cheers

Mate i just drove my r32 gtst from brisbane to perth and the car didn't miss a beat and the car aint standard - rb25det conv, hks 2530, pfc, pwr rad, plenam mod, splitfire coils, thermo's, 300rwhp etc. It gets great fuel economy when cruising along - about 10L/100kms around town and about 8.5L/100kms highway.

Ive had my car for 6yrs now and its always been reliable with a bit of help - always drive it gentlyish till its well up to op temp, ALWAYS use 98 octane fuel only, i change the oil every 5000kms, i use only genuine nissan coolant (recommended by richard at ARE), keep an ear out for ping under high load and drive it hard but not thrash it, if you know what i mean! Its worked for me so far! Get one but be picky - there are plenty of wornout shitboxes out there eh. I paid the extra coin and got the RACQ in QLD to look over mine before i bought it, they give you a report on things they find wrong with the car so you know what ur in for. Was worth it! Good luck!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...