Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Haha nice one.

Still, knocking can be avoided in any case...

This situation is so typical, backyard mechanics install their awesome stuff and take the car to the tuner where they find everything is wrong, then blame the tuner.

Save yourselves the hassles, take it to someone who knows what they are doing.

P.S the only way you can machine the face the manifold seals on is to remove the head! You shouldnt need to do that unless youve dug holes with a die grinder or similar cleaning the old gasket off or something stupid like that. But still wouldnt surprise me..

well, i mean it still can be a bad tuner cant it? why would any tuner tune a car that isnt up to scratch for tuning, and then also, why would he blame the cams? it doesnt make sense, you would think a tuner that was switch on would say, nar couldnt tune it because of this exhaust leak blah blah blah,

also the fact that a disco potato made 310hp (230kw) on 11psi is sus, i dont think its even possible,

so then again, its not down to poor fitment of parts,

I'm no tuner but... Looking at the boost curve I can say its not the tuner thats the problem.

Take the manifold to any engineering shop and get them to face the manifold if its leaking as much as you say its probly out by 1 - 2mm from being welded and not bolted down uring the process.

What brand is the manifold? Cracking on the weld is common for non-name stuff. It looks very thin... So are you going to replace it or try to get it welded up and hope it hangs together? The mounting face looks thick so it probably true, but check it anyway.

Re: the tuner going ahead and tuning something like that, yeah i have to agree with you guys now. He should have aborted the tune and called. Take it somewhere else next time.

putting stock manifold on i believe? it looked like a proper mani but guess not hey, the tuner still charged him the 600, so im guessing it was on there for the full time, you could hear the leak very easy when bonnet was open, also from what i was told (which gfunk can comfirm) he said i could only tune it for 11psi, and not 16psi because of it pinging, you have a exhaust leak aswell,

so yeah this does mean a bad tuner, specially when he blames the cams for the problems?

dodgey backyard mechanics, can hardly blame that for problems, no dogey stuff goes on here

so, when the car gets the manifold put on, and enough money saved for another tune, i think hes taking it to matt at pits to tune.,

i guess then we will find out what the program is like

(Gfunk is the one that spoke to the tuner on the phone, my other mate is the 1 that owns the car, reason gfunk spoke to the tuner was because our other mate doesnt know to much about cars,)

Edited by sly32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...