Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

this question always comes down to how much $$ u want to spend, and how much work u can do yourself.

cheaper (as stated) to buy 2nd hand rb26dett.

gazza- 15k for 450rwhp?

hopefully 15 k should get that as stock i was getting 350 with just zorst and boost controller

well awd adaptor plate is $900 + labour Fair call, but adapter plate labour isn't hugely significant in the rebuild process.

+ retap block for rb26 arp headstuds another $500 + labour For 400hp?

+ timing belt/tensioner kit $300 + labour Why? timing belts are <$50 and unless your tensioners are shagged you can reuse.

+ crank collar $150 + labour Fair call.

(going by pro engines pricing)

and any other nitty gritty things that you may need to fit a rb30 bottom end into a GTR

So, I forgot about the adapter plate.. the adapter plate is the only significant difference between putting a 30 in a gtst or a gtr.

For a basic build (400hp) I wouldn't bother with arp headstuds. Timing belts can be had a lot cheaper than pro-engines.

Crank collar would need to be done anyway unless the guy was going to buy a 33gtr crank.

I have been in a 4wd RB30 R32 and IMO the 3L goodness is worth the extra 1-1.5k. There's also a pair of -5's for sale which would go quite nicely on there :P

Seriously, if you only wanted the extra torque and not looking to put huge turbos on there, the build could be done in a weekend if you know what you're doing and have access to the right tools.*

*Providing you have all the parts ready to go. A workshop won't do it for you in a weekend though and would probably encourage a full forged build. Horses for courses, it all comes down to what you want to do with it and how much you want to spend. Just don't get talked into going overboard when it's not needed :)

Edited by bubba

His being a 93 model GTR i assume has a wide crank drive already

most engines this age are getting old and i wouldnt want to lose a 10k engine over a tensioner bearing or bolt etc

but in saying that even a pair of -5 produces close to 500awhp

then you have to lengthen the front pipe to accomadate the extra block height etc

lil stuff adds up :thumbsup:

His being a 93 model GTR i assume has a wide crank drive already

most engines this age are getting old and i wouldnt want to lose a 10k engine over a tensioner bearing or bolt etc

but in saying that even a pair of -5 produces close to 500awhp

then you have to lengthen the front pipe to accomadate the extra block height etc

lil stuff adds up :thumbsup:

Probably does already have the wide crank drive.

I was talking about a cheap build, not a 10k build. I wouldn't be skimping on tensioners if it was a 10k build.. because a few hundred dollars in the grand scheme of things, is nothing.

You don't necessarily have to change front pipe lengths etc, if there was enough clearance to the floorpan to begin with then it will more than likely be fine as 38mm at an angle over the length of the exhaust (from last hanger to firewall) will probably be sufficient. I didn't need to alter my exhaust at all :)

-5's don't HAVE to make 500awhp, the guy was looking for a figure of about 400hp which can be done without going to the 10k build extents. I suggested the -5's that are for sale because for 2.4k, it's a pretty bloody cheap bolt on turbo upgrade for the 26.

OR, to keep it cheap (meaning, not having to buy Jap stuff), 30 bottom end, highflowed turbos or some N1's if you can find them.

After having experienced a few twincam 30's now (and having one myself), I just feel that if you ARE going to rebuild, then a 3L bottom end is a no brainer!

but if your paying for a rebuild

machine work and labour is half the cost already

do it once do it right

if on the other hand you can do it urself

then i guess on the cheap is viable as u dont have to pay for labour when/if it blows up

thats how i see it anyway

but if your paying for a rebuild

machine work and labour is half the cost already

do it once do it right

if on the other hand you can do it urself

then i guess on the cheap is viable as u dont have to pay for labour when/if it blows up

thats how i see it anyway

Yeah but you don't have to go a 10k build just for the sake of it.. people have budgets and they have to work within those budgets, if that means not getting a $2k oil pump because you don't *need* it, then don't get it.

That's the way I see it, if it's not needed for the levels you want, then why waste the money when it could be better spent elsewhere?

Track levels are not street levels, as I have said a few times, the cost of a build is directly proportional to the power goals and the intended usage :P

Edited by bubba

10k is still a fairly basic rebuild (rb26)

last time i got quoted 5k for machine work, labour and R&R

still be using a N1 oil pump ~$500 these days

i do agree to build a car for whatever goal you set out to be

no point overkilling it

but if he wanted 400hp

wouldnt a set of -7 be better? more responsive so to speak

cheers for the input guys. i'll give c red a call about that rb26-30.

my car has done about 125000 kms for those who are wondering and i was just driving normally when it happened and BOOM there was no power when i was giving it throttle so i pulled over and when i listened to it idle it sounded like marbles in a tin can being shaken around. then it slowly died.

you guys have been really helpful :)

btw how much is a r34 motor and where can i find one?.

Edited by nism0man

or take this option

Brand New Modified Nissan R33 GTR N1 Engine - Nissan Skyline GTR

Professionally Assembled - 500PS Package

Our price: AUD 23000.00

http://justjap.com/store/home.php?cat=334

Edited by gazza750

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...