Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

a friend of the family used to have a pulsar ET turbo (FWD)

let me explain his dilemma... its wet turning across an intersection, mate turns steering wheel, car keeps going straight

$3000 later and it makes you wonder

if you lose it in a RWD car you can easily regain it. loste it in a FWD car and you better hope you have nothing within a 20m radius of where you are!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25752-fwd-vs-rwd/page/2/#findComment-547523
Share on other sites

Originally posted by WazR32GTSt

if you lose it in a RWD car you can easily regain it.

That's an exceptionally dangerous generalisation. I've seen the opposite, and it's the very reason I don't drive 10/10ths on the road in ANY car.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25752-fwd-vs-rwd/page/2/#findComment-547538
Share on other sites

Yeah same here. One day it was wet and I took a bend a little too hard in my Skyline and before I knew it, my car was facing the other way on the road. Now, normally I'm ok with handling the rear end sliding out, but this time it took me totally by surprise. Now, I never drive my car even slightly hard in the wet.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25752-fwd-vs-rwd/page/2/#findComment-547641
Share on other sites

Originally posted by WazR32GTSt

if you lose it in a RWD car you can easily regain it. loste it in a FWD car and you better hope you have nothing within a 20m radius of where you are!

i wonder how do u drive as u can EASILY regain the lose of yr line, u must be a pro racer or a drift expert.

a rwd WILL understeering and a fwd can oversteering.

but in fwd usually won't oversteering, so u only have to look after the understeering when u drive hard.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25752-fwd-vs-rwd/page/2/#findComment-547684
Share on other sites

If you are a slow sensible driver, FWD works fine. The handling characteristics are safe and predictable, and there will be more traction in the wet because most of the weight is on the driving wheels. The main disadvantage is chronic understeer, which is actually good. Even a poor driver will instinctively back off before the car goes totally out of control, so its safe for granny to drive. The main disadvantage is very high front tyre wear compared to anything else.

RWD is a better performance setup though. It will have more ultimate traction in the dry and better handling characteristics. For a young guy far better than FWD. But this assumes an IRS, rear disk brakes, and probably an LSD as well. It is going to be better for an enthusiast, but not so safe for a poor driver, especially in the wet with a lot of power.

4WD is by far the best overall package. Yes, it weighs about 80Kg more, but the drivetrain loss is very misleading. I can tell you for a fact that converting a FWD car to 4WD (Laser) resulted in an improvement in fuel economy and a massive reduction in tyre wear. I have read somewhere that driving all wheels consumes less power than trying to push or pull a pair of undriven wheels. It has something to do with the hysteresis losses in flexing the rubber in the tyres.

On a dyno, 4WD show lower power output than 2WD.

But if you put your 2WD on a 4 roller dyno and coupled the rollers somehow, so the driving wheels were forced to turn the loaded non driven wheels, net power output would be greatly reduced. And that is exactly what happens on the road.

You gain more from reduced tyre losses than you lose through a few more ball bearings and an extra diff. Few people realise this though.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25752-fwd-vs-rwd/page/2/#findComment-547725
Share on other sites

haha... don't think i have seen one convincing argument why to go for the RWD over the FWD and its probably true.

Generally RWD cars just have the capacity for more power. I think its mainly because of the usual transverse mount and requirement for a smaller gearbox mean you don't get totally hyper FWD cars, but maybe if its your first car that isn't necessarily a bad thing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25752-fwd-vs-rwd/page/2/#findComment-547761
Share on other sites

Well the best of luck.

His dad was probably driving before he was even born, and as you grow older your perspectives change quite a lot. (I am an old fart myself).

While "junior" is probably getting all excited about power to weight ratios, and standing quarter mile times, "granddad" just wants to get there safely, and without breaking down, or having to completely refill the fuel tank every three days.

After a while you are just happy to sit on, or just below the speed limit, and watch the crazy hoons tear past, followed three cars back by the uniformed copper in the unmarked police car. Hehehe.

You see the poor young guy pulled up a mile down the road, with the bonnet up, and the copper with his foot on the front bumper, busily writing on his clipboard. Been there, done that.

You become very philosophical in your old age.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25752-fwd-vs-rwd/page/2/#findComment-549813
Share on other sites

It would be hard to convince your dad (since he's buying) to get a RWD over a FWD....

It is true that FWD will tend to understeer when pushed hard around a corner, but do you know that frontal hit is much more safer than a sideway? The whole bonet area in modern cars will act an impact absorber, so the shockwave is not as great. As the matter of fact, car manufacturers design their cars to induce initial understeer to promote hitting a "target" with the crumple zone, even in RWD cars like Skyline (unless suspension has been modified).

On the other hand, RWD will tend to oversteer, which means you'll be facing either sideways or backwards towards what you're about to hit. If you spin 180 degrees and hit it backwards, it won't be too bad as the boot area also acts as a crumple zone

However.... the scary stuff...

If you hit whatever it is sideways.... occupants are more likely to get injured if their car is wrapped against a pole.

Not all FWD 2003 models are crappy... some are quite nice indeed. Get something in the hot hatches family, Golf R32 (coming soon), Focus, Clio, Astra... I wouldn't mind to get one if someone is buying me...

I've been driving on the road for 15 years, and most cars I saw in the news wrapped against a pole and badly injured (or killed) its occupants are RWD... I have no statistics to prove this but this is from my memory recollection watching TV news so far... I agree FWD is safer for city driving, and RWD is best left for sport/performance driving.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25752-fwd-vs-rwd/page/2/#findComment-550065
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Mate you saved be from dying in the Perth summer. AC wasn't changing direction and just going into diagnostics mode fixed it. You're a legend and I would shout you a beer if I could!
    • Unfortunately effort gone to waste, you will have substantial issues with how the manifold and wastegate have been integrated. You would be so much better off with a modified stock manifold like this: https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25detexgatedmanifold/   OR literally just getting a off the shelf Sinco or 6Boost manifold as myself and others have mentioned.  
    • Yuck. But it's kinda the same principle, moving timing around to make car run bad but sound good.... I went for a more spirited tuning drive to iron out a few things. Car no longer stalls, and it loved to dip RPM low when you clutch in. After tuning this (and the 4-5 tables that HPTuners/LS1 OEM ECU wants for idle air correction) it's now behaving somewhat normal. All expected because there's a new TB, new Intake manifold and that new TB which is 102mm vs 78... has an entirely different IAC passage which is smaller because ????? Unfortunately at this point I went to make further fine tuning changes to avoid it flaring up, you know... _tuning_ the HPTuners dongle died. Well to be more accurate - The USB cable died in a fashion that anyone who has ever charged a phone will recognize. After the app demanding I resync it 50 or so times (which all 'succeeded' but all failed) the device does not want to sync and I've logged a ticket with support to see if it's fixable. US Support said it was a 'storage issue' but after removing the SD card inside it and formatting it/fixing it the issue does persist. Unfortunately usually the fix is "Turn in your old dongle and pay $700 for the upgraded one" it's cheaper because I get some free licence credits I unfortunately don't need. However I'm 10 minutes down the road from HP Tuners AUS/VCM so at least I won't need to post it, and logged a new ticket for support over here. Definitely drives different. My SOTP dyno believes it's probably making 310-320kw instead of the 280 before.  It scrambles for traction a little now whereas it previously different. It drives like a bigger cam car up top even though the cam is smaller, likely due to the cam not being advanced 6 degrees. The timing is deliberately low and the fuel is very rich so who knows if this will improve on the dyno. It may, imperceptably. Also funny is removing the pineapples definitely makes the car squat more and axle tramp less. So this behavior of having more top end, squatting more, and scrabbling for traction more makes me think = more power. But I could have just been sitting on the threshold of that kind of behavior before. Time will tell if my butt dyno is calibrated right. I need the exhaust leaks fixed before dyno tune for obvious AFR related reasons - I repositioned the pipes but I'm not confident it's fully sealed even if it is better. At least the car does drive around while I cannot tweak/tune it for now. And I have aircon again. medium success!
    • Don't use that manifold. Please don't use that manifold. Sunk cost fallacy is not worth the later pain. None of these will be relevant to the change that will come from the different turbo and manifold. As in, the effect of the exhaust will be nil, regardless of what else is changed. And all the cam and fuel system stuff is not changing either way, so has no effect. The turbo and manifold (and to a small extent the wastegate)....big change.
×
×
  • Create New...