Jump to content
SAU Community

Open Face Vs Full Face Helmet

Rekin

By Rekin,
in Motorsport Discussion & Builds

 Share

Recommended Posts

Rekin Grand Master

Rekin

Posted
Posted

Hey all,

Going to start tracking my car and Im after a helmet.

I was wondering what is the most preferred helmet... Open face or Full face?

Full face seems quite restricted in air flow, as it covers your face and being in a car you dont have wind passing over the helmet..although it looks better and the stig has one! :worship:

Open face is much easier to put on (especially with my glasses) but its hard to find one which doesnt look suited for a scooter :)

What would be the best design for a trackday helmet :blink:

Thanks

Patrick

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Marlin Grand Master

Marlin

Posted
Posted

This is three for an open face.

I run a Sparco mainly because it's comfortable for my head shape, and as I wear glasses a full face is just way too much of a pain. Glasses mean even the Stilo open face with the built in microphone boom are a pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rekin Grand Master

Rekin

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I have a full face and voteing for open face..

interesting, could you explain why you voting for the open face?

cheers all for response.

Will most likely get an open face helmet. The only open-faced helmets at bike shops are $100, and there isnt anything above. Rest are all full-faced..

Tried one of those full face flip-up's which convert to openface, but they feel very top heavy when its opened hehe

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DJRIFT Veteran

DJRIFT

Posted
Posted

i have always had full face ones but i think if i had to buy another id get an open face.

the full face gets the safety first tick as if you hit a wall hard im sure you want to smile afterwards. also i gess in a roll over ect with flying glass ect it will save your face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fatz Grand Master

fatz

Posted
Posted

ful face is you use a seat belt

open if you use harness's

saw a guy who smashed his face up with and open face on the steering wheel (would not have happend if it was full face and he had harnesses)

when i stuck my car in the wall my head hit the wheel full face all the way if you ask me

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Duncan Grand Master

Duncan

Posted
Posted

Absolutely full face is safer, and some events will not accept open face for that reason. No way would I go open face (I know some rally types like it, easier to see and speak) but there is more than enough field of view for track work with a closed face helmet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Motorhead Contributor

Motorhead

Posted
Posted

Recently needed a new helmet for a track day, my old one – think cheap Chinese (Bike) helmet wore through and was in pretty average condition after only 4 years and a handful of uses. I initially went out looking for an open face, but was persuaded after trying a few on. Arai has a close face helmet with an extra wide eye port. Best of both worlds I think, closed face, but with great visibility & comfort. Was happy paying more for quality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PHaT MR30 Grand Master

PHaT MR30

Posted
Posted

I think it all depends on what you use it for, if your only going to do club days and wear a lap/sash belt get a Fullface.

If your looking at doing more full on stuff where your spending longer periods of time in the car, wearing a harness consider an open face.

I feel so much more comfortable in an open face i don't think I could possibly wear a full face again.

Don't buy the cheapest available, there is a reason why they are cheap! Most good helmets start about $6-700, but you may find sales where they can be had for more like $500.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hrd-hr30 Grand Master

hrd-hr30

Posted
Posted

open face/full face - your choice. I'll add my vote for full face helmets because you're wearing them for safety - a full face offers more protection. Just seriously consider this article before purchasing an expensive helmet that meets Snell standards. The results of their impact tests are a real eye-opener.

http://www.motorcyclistonline.com/gearbox/...view/index.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites
badhairdave Proficient

badhairdave

Posted
Posted
ful face is you use a seat belt

open if you use harness's

saw a guy who smashed his face up with and open face on the steering wheel (would not have happend if it was full face and he had harnesses)

when i stuck my car in the wall my head hit the wheel full face all the way if you ask me

I agree completely as another person who's run into a wall (though luckily didn't head butt the wheel). There is no way i'd wear an open face helmet at a speed event.

A secondary consideration is additional protection from flying glass and debris in an acco, as well as some (but not heaps of) additional protection in a fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Roy Grand Master

Roy

Posted
Posted

Forget safety. I would only ever use a full face helmet because of the risk of an accident. ,I have never been injured, thank god, but i have always been thankful for wearing a full face helmet as with a simple drop of the visor nobody can be sure who was driving and after returning to the pits after the accident you can claim it wasnt you driving

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S13Deviat Grand Master

S13Deviat

Posted
Posted

Full face all the way.... a great analgy for you...

"A full face helmet is just like a condom".... I'd rather have one on me for safety sake and not need it, than need it and not have it ....

So in short i would rather have the full face, just for the off chance you are in a pickel of a moment

:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 months later...
blackrex Mentor

blackrex

Posted
Posted

Opening and old thread here, I'd go a full face helmet as well, even in a closed top car.

I hit a seagull dead centre in the windscreen at over 200kp/h on the main straight at PI a few years ago, this shattered the windscreen and sprayed glass all over me. If I hadn't had the full face helmet on, I most likely would have had serious eye damage, as well as major facial cuts. The glass hit the visor hard enough to gouge the material, so I would hate to think what it would have done to my skin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • MBS206
      Skid pans in/around Sydney?

      By MBS206 · Posted

      Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • MBS206
      Skid pans in/around Sydney?

      By MBS206 · Posted

      Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • GTSBoy
      PRP RB26 cast block + head prototype running

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • V35_Paul
      Thinking of getting a Q50 300hp and just tuning it instead of getting the Q50 Red or 400R

      By V35_Paul · Posted

    • joshuaho96
      PRP RB26 cast block + head prototype running

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
×
×
  • Create New...