Jump to content
SAU Community

Piston To Bore Clearance, Forged Pistons


Recommended Posts

I am wonder what people run for piston to bore clearances. I am looking for people with a lot of experience and or a very long time running engine.

HKS 87mm step 2 (molybdenum coated) (or Tomei/Trust/Greddy, all have similar material/size spec)

+-1.6 bar max street =

+-1.6 bar max track/drag =

+-2.0 bar max street =

+-2.0 bar max track/drag =

+2.0 bar street =

+2.0 bar track/drag =

CP 87mm (or JE/Wiseco, all have similar material/size spec)

+-1.6 bar max street =

+-1.6 bar max track/drag =

+-2.0 bar max street =

+-2.0 bar max track/drag =

+2.0 bar street =

+2.0 bar track/drag =

I run most engine's we build with HKS/Tomei/Trust pistons at:

1.6 bar = 1.9" thou STREET

2.0 bar = 2.2" thou STREET

+2.0bar = 2.4" thou STREET

1.6 bar = 3.0" thou RACE/DRAG

2.0 bar = 3.2" thou RACE/DRAG

+2.0bar = 3.5" thou RACE/DRAG

and CP/JE/Wiseco's at:

1.6 bar = 2.7" thou STREET

2.0 bar = 3.0" thou STREET

+2.0bar = 3.3" thou STREET

1.6 bar = 3.8" thou RACE/DRAG

2.0 bar = 4.0" thou RACE/DRAG

+2.0bar = 4.5" thou RACE/DRAG

Edited by Sky-Engineering
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read the piston manufacturers instructions. I always use their figure plus half a thou on top. You can go 1 - 1.5 thou if there is nitrous involved but other than that, stay close to their instructions. Never make up your own clearances because they seem right. HKS run some fairly tight tolerances on some of their stuff but others are loose.

IT ALL COMES DOWN TO THE MATERIAL THE PISTON IS MADE OUT OF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And just to add to that, different manufacturers use different clearances measured at different areas on the piston. Some measure clearance from the centre, some from the crown, some from the bottom of the skirt etc. That is why it's important to read their instructions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine using something as per the specs from the actual maker... What is the world coming too :/

Yeah, what would the manufacturer know about piston clearances? :)

I run pistons at nominal size, that is, if they are made to suit an 86.5 bore, I run an 86.5 bore. For something with nitrous or really high boost I may run .0005" more. One area worth a look though is ring gaps, damage can be huge if they are too tight. I don't use Venolia pistons though as I just can't cope with the huge clearances they run and the noise when they're cold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's the most absurd thing I've ever heard. I would go cut bellhousing over that monstrosity of a flywheel all day, every day. It puts a lot more mass further from the last main bearing. I've had nothing but problems with Collins in the past and refuse to ever buy their products again. I would not trust anything they tell you. He's playing his salesman card.  I'm currently at 640whp on a mustang dyno (~770bhp) with the intentions of running E85 and a lot more power this upcoming spring. Cheers, 
    • Nah, it's not the reduced knock margin. It is a direct mechanical effect of having to initiate the combustion earlier, while the piston is still rising, which starts to exert combustion pressure on the rising piston earlier, making the rest of the engine work harder to finish driving the piston up to TDC where the combustion pressure stops being a negative and starts being a positive. Your modern engine that only needs ~10° to make MBT doesn't waste the other 10 or so degrees of crank rotation. That's almost all of it. The difference in knock margin might go either way. Remember that modern engines to which you are currently comparing the long tractor engine (the RB) are now running super high compression, direct injection, tricky cam control and maybe even cylinder pressure sensors. You're not comparing apples with other fruit. It's apples and sea weed, or some other evolutionarily primitive vegetation. And remember, squish only really comes into play at the very end of the stroke. It certainly does good things, but it is not the biggest contributor to what's going on. It is quite possibly much less important in 4 valve head than 2 valvers also, because there is so much less squish available to a 4 valve anyway.
    • Food for thought, a longer stroke motor would need less ignition timing vs. a shorter stroke motor requiring more ignition timing.
    • Thanks Duncan, HART is only 10 mins from me (I did my bike license there), it'd be awesome if it ran these types of things.  Sutton Road does look good and they take fewer cars than SMSP which is good.  Surely you have enough land to lay a few million tonnes of concrete and some sprinklers D? 
    • I thought an engine that needs more ignition timing to make power is going to result in less power due to reduced knock margin? More time for the combustion to propagate -> more time for it to heat up the rest of the mix to detonation.
×
×
  • Create New...