Jump to content
SAU Community

2009 Nissan Gt-r Updated Official 0-60mph Time


Recommended Posts

so the thing launches at 3000rpm now - vs what 4800rpm?

Question is, how is it now quicker?

Maybe they recalibrated the traction control? New rubber?

Either way, if the numbers are true, they've pulled a hare out of their clacker on this one.

plenty of reviewers have stated anything from 3.3-3.5s on the original one. Pretty much the ones that reckon it wont go below 3.7 just aren't pushing it hard enough :banana: not that 0.2s is really that huge a difference :/

so the thing launches at 3000rpm now - vs what 4800rpm?

Question is, how is it now quicker?

Maybe they recalibrated the traction control? New rubber?

Either way, if the numbers are true, they've pulled a hare out of their clacker on this one.

VDC is improved greatly to be far less intrusive in R mode. More power. Better rubber. Ideal conditions.

Yeah, some dude over in the US just did an 11.03 sec quarter mile with just a cobb tune and the new revised LC. Imagine that, a street car in Australia that does low 11 sec quarter miles each and every time, day in day out. You'll virtually be unbeatable :)

Who would've thought that Nissan would make a car this good for this price? I mean, i used to dream about owning a 911 turbo because of its performance numbers. Now, i don't need to anymore - I can get a GTR which is even faster for under half the price of the Porker. Good times indeed. Thank you Nissan.

I bet the guys who cancel their order in Australia because they thought that Nissan would remove the LC feature for Australian models are pretty pissed off right now - considering that all GTR allocations for Australia have been sold.

Edited by skyline_man

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
×
×
  • Create New...