Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Horsepower is directly related to torque calculated over time. This is why dyno's (dynometer) although show readings in HP or KW, actually measure the amount of torque the car takes to spin the rollers or hubs. (chassis dyno)

This is straight out of a history book:

The term horsepower was invented by the engineer James Watt. Watt lived from 1736 to 1819 and is most famous for his work on improving the performance of steam engines. We are also reminded of him every day when we talk about 60-watt light bulbs. The story goes that Watt was working with ponies lifting coal at a coal mine, and he wanted a way to talk about the power available from one of these animals. He found that, on average, a mine pony could do 22,000 foot-pounds of work in a minute. He then increased that number by 50 percent and pegged the measurement of horsepower at 33,000 foot-pounds of work in one minute. It is that arbitrary unit of measure that has made its way down through the centuries and now appears on your car, your lawn mower, your chain saw and even in some cases your vacuum cleaner!

POWER:

1 Horsepower = 0.7456999 kilowatts = 0.0007456999 megawatts = 745.6999 watts = 42.44498 BTU/minute = 0.7074163 BTU/second = 178.2659 calories/second = 33000 foot-pounds/minute = 550 foot-pounds/second = 76.04034 kilogram-metres/second = 1.0138712 PS (Pferdestaerke is Metric Horsepower)

There are other combinations of converting units of power, but would NEVER be used in the real world.

Example using the above:

"A Nissan R32 Skyline GTR with the twin turbo RB26DETT engine is rated @ 280PS, which equates to approximately 276BHP or 206kW."

This is why the ongoing debate of "HP versus torque - which is better?" is always such a silly thing to be talking about, since HP or KW is torque expressed over time. This why having a car that has torque being produced early and in the middle of the rpm range will always accelerate away from a car that has it's peak torque being developed higher in the rpm range despite both cars having the same HP...

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This is really serious stuff. Maybe we can turn it into an election issue, you know............ street marches, petitions, bumper stickers, politicians giving interviews on TV, all that stuff.

This could be the really BIG issue at the next Federal election horsepower or Kw, let the people decide.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Following from this in a related by not closely-related sense... Because I was buying a bunch of other GKTech stuff, I got some rear subframe collars. The history that leads up to this is: 25+ years ago the car arrived into the country with stock subframe bushes. At some point shortly thereafter I added Whiteline pineapple rings, set up neutral, and it improved the rear end behaviour. Well, it is my vague memory that I was happier with it with them in. Less axle tramp on launches, generally better, etc etc. ~2012 it got a new non-HICAS subframe with new stock bushes. No pineapple rings. I reckon that ever since then I've been dissatisfied with the axle tramp. Recently I've been f**king around a lot with all aspects of the suspension. One contemplation has been to relocate the rear lower control arm front mount points (and do the other things needed to make that work) to improve longitudinal rear grip by getting rid of some of the stupid anti-squat that Nissan ladled into the R32. But.... before doing that I thought I'd put some collars in. And.... The collars are good. The rear sounds a little bit different, but there has been no significant increase in NVH coming up into the body. In terms of rear behaviour - expansion joints on long sweeping elevated freeway ramps that would sometimes cause the rear to jiggle around a bit, no longer seem to do so. It appears that jamming chunks of metal into the gaps in the rubber so they can't move much is a really good thing. And the launch behaviour and general forward traction situation seems to be greatly improved too. It's impossible to be really sure, because the tyres are completely shagged - they are freakishly willing to let go right now. But as an A-B test with the same tyres it certainly seems to grip up a lot better. Highly recommended to anyone who still has stock bushes.
    • Bit off topic maybe but has anyone had a crack at one of those aftermarket electric compressors ? Bit of a search came up with one put out by Speedy Air Spares. Looks interesting and looks as if you'd have to run a big arse alternator. Found this out after the fact as my air con compressor packed it in and soon after my alternator ! !
    • Yes. Needs new ports. Usually just achieved by screwing an adapter onto them. Be aware that any AC compressor that hasn't been used in a long time will very likely have dried out seals and will not hold gas. Oh, and obviously you will require a new receiver-dryer also.
    • Can you covert an R32's AC from r12 to r134 if the compressor/hoses etc are still all good? Pretty sure on my car the AC was degassed when it was imported  to remove the naughty r12 and save the ozone layer, and the fancy climate control system just blew air around. Was happy to drive the car with windows down back then, but now I am old and need to be kept cool
    • Just to circle back here, I've sold my automatic trans to another Stagea owner in OH.
×
×
  • Create New...