Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 285
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i have not been in an rb30/26 car... quite frankly im not that keen to. a high powered rb30 just doesnt hold that same appeal to me as a high powered or even mild rb26.. its working with what the car came with from factory.. making the best of what youve got. engine transplants are just like plastic surgery... your car may go good.. but everyone knows that its not what it was born with.

i hold rb30 powered gtr's at the same level as VL drag cars.. its just not a gtr anymore.

and to say that japs are scared of big things.. and thats why they dont use them... maybe its because they just dont need to.

why dont we all just put twin turbo LS2s in our skylines.

i have not been in an rb30/26 car... quite frankly im not that keen to. a high powered rb30 just doesnt hold that same appeal to me as a high powered or even mild rb26.. its working with what the car came with from factory.. making the best of what youve got. engine transplants are just like plastic surgery... your car may go good.. but everyone knows that its not what it was born with.

i hold rb30 powered gtr's at the same level as VL drag cars.. its just not a gtr anymore.

and to say that japs are scared of big things.. and thats why they dont use them... maybe its because they just dont need to.

why dont we all just put twin turbo LS2s in our skylines.

your boring...

engine conversions are mad!!!

especially big powered ones in light bodies!!

i have not been in an rb30/26 car... quite frankly im not that keen to. a high powered rb30 just doesnt hold that same appeal to me as a high powered or even mild rb26.. its working with what the car came with from factory.. making the best of what youve got. engine transplants are just like plastic surgery... your car may go good.. but everyone knows that its not what it was born with.

i hold rb30 powered gtr's at the same level as VL drag cars.. its just not a gtr anymore.

and to say that japs are scared of big things.. and thats why they dont use them... maybe its because they just dont need to.

why dont we all just put twin turbo LS2s in our skylines.

Mate, I totally agree!

For those who want it, fine. It is definately a personal choice how you want to modify your own car.

For me personally, I do not want a mongrol engine in my pure-bred Jap sports car. An RB30 is just like a pig, it is a dirty animal, put it in a clean environment and it is much better, but it is still a dirty smelly pig!

How is that for a pot stir? 2.6L all the way.

Mate, I totally agree!

For those who want it, fine. It is definately a personal choice how you want to modify your own car.

For me personally, I do not want a mongrol engine in my pure-bred Jap sports car. An RB30 is just like a pig, it is a dirty animal, put it in a clean environment and it is much better, but it is still a dirty smelly pig!

How is that for a pot stir? 2.6L all the way.

LOL, i like your style..

lets see you rev a rb30 over 12,000rpm !!!!!!

All these naysayers, have you been in a car powererd by a twincam 30?

I didn't question ability of either engine. The idea of owning one does not interest me so why would I want to be in a car powered by one?

If you can do the same thing, as in make good power and run good times, with either capacity (i.e. either block) then what is the big deal? It is a personal choice which way to do it. There is just a bit more pride and class doing it with the original capacity.

Mike

I didn't question ability of either engine. The idea of owning one does not interest me so why would I want to be in a car powered by one?

If you can do the same thing, as in make good power and run good times, with either capacity (i.e. either block) then what is the big deal? It is a personal choice which way to do it. There is just a bit more pride and class doing it with the original capacity.

Mike

I beg to differ. I feel there is more pride and class in building something different and why would you balk at more torque, earlier power and better drivability?

Better yet, hands up all the cheque-book racers!

Who needs to rev their rb to 12000rpm?

Build a 30/26 rev it to 9000rpm and make 553.5 kw at 4 wheels on pump fuel.

And hang the fu{k on. YEA MATE.......

Now THAT'S what I'm talking about! :)

I beg to differ. I feel there is more pride and class in building something different and why would you balk at more torque, earlier power and better drivability?

Your opinion, that is what these forums are for.

More power and torque earlier, fair enough. But the same times on a drag strip and/or circuit can be achieved either way, so, again as I said, it is a personal choice.

If your builiding the car for street use you simply cannot go past the 30... Simple as that.

And for all you pure breds out there - get with it, the RB30 has been mated with all RB's with great results. Like it has been said before if you can have more power & more torque earlier why not?

Also for all who are saying lets see it rev to 12,000 rpm - that is ridiculous as we are talking about a STREET car, do you rev your car to 12,000 rpm on the street - I would hazard a guess you wouldnt get near or even need 10,000 rpm.

Look at superjet760 - as if you would say no to that!!!

My 2 cents...

hmmmmm, i do like the idea of keeping the RB26 in my car, my R33 is pretty standard looking (except the LMGT4 rims), no gauges, not lowered etc (except the engine mods) good for resale, but the RB30 sounds sweet, i sponsor robbie 'RIPS' wards car, maybe i should fly up and have a spin in an RB30? :)

just remember boys revs are what kill engines.

So if you can make the same power with less revs and less engine wear then why not? A 3l

BTW give me a billet 3l crank and a R.I.P.S billet main cap bottom end and il go rev for rev with you all the way to 12000rpm

if thats what you like doing. but i cant see the need :)

Edited by superjet760
Your opinion, that is what these forums are for.

More power and torque earlier, fair enough. But the same times on a drag strip and/or circuit can be achieved either way, so, again as I said, it is a personal choice.

Yes it is my opinion, aswell as many others.

More power and torque earlier means more average power, which makes for a faster car.

Yes it is my opinion, aswell as many others.

More power and torque earlier means more average power, which makes for a faster car.

Dude, look at the times from drags and circuit. You can do the same with both! More average power, over a certain rpm means dick all if you spend your time between 4-8.5k.

Do you want me to get Chuck Norris so he can explain it speaking braille to you?

Dude, look at the times from drags and circuit. You can do the same with both! More average power, over a certain rpm means dick all if you spend your time between 4-8.5k.

Do you want me to get Chuck Norris so he can explain it speaking braille to you?

Uhuh. Nice one.

Dude, look at the times from drags and circuit. You can do the same with both! More average power, over a certain rpm means dick all if you spend your time between 4-8.5k.

You just made a very nonsensical comment there man... "More average power, over a certain rpm means dick all if you spend your time between 4-8.5k. "... if you make more average power between 4000-8500rpm (thats a certain rpm) and spend all your time there, then you will have more acceleration/response between 4-8.5krpm, very very simple.

I don't know why you guys are going on about the RB30 being shit/old/whatever, if you use the RB26 head then you have all the advantage the RB26 has an a dirty old iron block thats 3litres instead of a dirty old iron block thats only 2.6litres. They are both dirty and old, its just that one is bigger than the other. It seems there is a lot of confusion of the old days when the old 2.6litre RB26 beat the older 5litre Oz V8s due to technology... it didn't win because it was smaller, it won because the stuff it had it used better. The ultimate is applying the technology to bigger displacement, you get the best of both worlds.

Edited by Lithium
I don't know why you guys are going on about the RB30 being shit/old/whatever, if you use the RB26 head then you have all the advantage the RB26 has an a dirty old iron block thats 3litres instead of a dirty old iron block thats only 2.6litres. They are both dirty and old, its just that one is bigger than the other. It seems there is a lot of confusion of the old days when the old 2.6litre RB26 beat the older 5litre Oz V8s due to technology... it didn't win because it was smaller, it won because the stuff it had it used better. The ultimate is applying the technology to bigger displacement, you get the best of both worlds.

Look they are both nuggets that empty my wallet, keep me busy, make me drink a lot, force me to spend less time with my family, make me loose hair, made my nuts twist in their sack etc...etc...

Some like pepsi...others like coke...

some like racing cars...others like stacking pallets...

who cares...pick an engine and love it, flog it to death, have some fun and scare the sh1t out of your mates with it.

I love the RB engine from RB20 to RB30... :sick:

My engine will out torque nearly all RB30's ive encountered and matched the ultimate torque engine RB29 from racepace in all but the very low rev range and was all over it in the midrange where it really counts.

Even the RB25 i just built for NYTSKY matched torque figures with a 400KW 2JZ...its not what you build but how you build it. Just because you use a bigger bottom end does not save it from being a bucket of sh1t.

Wait till i get into the RB30's...ill have a few surprises im sure.

Edited by DiRTgarage

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks! Will get it looked at before winter 🥶 other than that she's a mint ride love it aye 
    • FWIW a lot of the local owners that do a big build tend to have cars that are perpetually broken. 
    • I just got this system but haven’t installed yet I got a Moroso sealed box (defect reasons) which will be set up same as their pic The quality is high grade, the correspondence I had with the owner (former head designer for Rockford Fosgate) was unbelievable, guiding me with what I needed. Even told me not to buy some things as it could be sorted in a different way at his loss. Just a bit of a bite with the exchange rate and don’t purchase gear in 1 hit that goes over $1,000 au, lol I forgot!  
    • Thanks mate for that reply. Very helpful.    it’s a 2022 400R so would most likely lose those features as you say.     I did a quick compare of a rv37 nav and heading for sale in Japan to q50 model. I’ll pop pics below. Seems  Japan spec head into top, nav unit second below it   below pic Q50 aud delivered     differences seem to be Aus delivered has a different plug top left hand side of head unit- not sure what and where it goes.   and nav unit Japanese tv37 had an extra plug put    Again I’m really not sure what each of these differences mean!       the actual plugs on a v37 and q50 screens look identical on both screens… pics below for comparing. (One screen was is a us delivered one) but should be same gps signals etc as Australia.    If it were as simple as swapping a nav unit from q50 aud delivered im interested -just want to figure out what the missing plug is for before spending big $ on a second hand part for it to not work, and I guess with the head unit, if the band expander does the job (I got a 20mHz so should get the range I’m after) so should narrow my issue down to nav unit only.  I’d love to know what the extra cable on rv37 does and if I eliminate that part what it’ll do to the setup,    and also, if I can figure out what that head unit plug difference is, what does that cable do and where does it got can it be altered or re-plugged?! Excuse my ignorance what is ACP/AA, what does that stand for? (Apple car play? Android air play)? so If I swapped head units to save using a band expander, I’d likely lose those better features to have an oem Unit operational. Better to use a band expander and retain AirPlay options and newer version of head unit     provably best to band expand it, and focus on the nav unit. th isn’t  a big deal/ would be cool to have it working  from what I can tel we use a PAL Signal and Japan uses a NTSC signal  I don’t know if there’s a co better or if the screen only reads NTSC, or if it’s the tv module that needs replacing… no big deal don’t need it but more of a curiosity thing on that!   Thanks for the info re tyre sensors, helpful and great to know.  I was reading the online manual off Japan website and it seemed to make it sound more confusing than it is  I guess a rim replacement would require the sensors to be moved to a new rim to carry that option over?!     Thanks for the info regarding diagnostic mode. I appreciate your help mate. Trying to brainstorm here to find a solution to get as much gadgets as I can working! I plan to get my local Nissan tech to have a look too who used to be at an Infiniti dealer back in the day to see if any thing they have or idea can find a soliton. But hoping anyone here has gone down the same route to make life easier!!   i guess identifying the cable/plug differences and what they do would be a great way of finding out if the units are transferable    thanks again 
    • No idea about the remote start part. If the V37 nav is anything like other Nissan JDM vehicles, you can't get the factory Japanese nav working in australia, a card from a different car almost certainly won't work, those cards are usually matched to the serial number of the DCU.  You could be possibly swap out the components from a AuDM Q50 to get it working, but if this is a new model (2021+) 400R, then you will lose the newer features like ACP/AA.  That said, if you have ACP/AA, just use google maps.. I assume a band expander would be required to get the local radio stations, but don't forget the Japanese FM band is narrower than ours, so you still might not be able to receive all Australian stations. I can't see any reason the tyre pressure sensors won't work here, there is the sensor unit inside the rim and the receiver nearby in the wheel well.  I have never had to change the batteries on my 2015 Q50, so I assume they last quite a while.  A straight battery change shouldn't need them to be re-registered as they are the same unit, that should only be required if you replace a sensor with a new one.   Word of warning, if you ever go into the 'secret' diagnostics mode on the main screen, DO NOT EVER do a 'reset' in this menu, it will erase all of your model specific data in the DCU and you will need a trip to a dealer to re-program it all, which would be particularly painful being an import.  This applies to the AuDM Q50 too.
×
×
  • Create New...