Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all got a quick 1 for u about boost control kit for power fc it has 3 vac inputs com,nc,no.

in the apexi powerfc faq it has

COM line should goto wastegate actuator

NO line should goto intercooler piping

but nothing about NC is this where ur map sensor go's or dose map sensor go to intake vac out let..

also why dose NO line goto intercooler piping and not into intake vac out let as thats where most boost controler ran from i throught

i am using external gate mate

so dose external gate go to nc

then whats com go to mate

this what it says for external gate nothing about NC

For external wastegate setup it should be plumbed between the manifold and your external wastegate pressure line.

COM port to the top of the external waste gate

NC port goes to IC pipe - I will explain how I did it

I connected a vac line directly from the blow off valve vac port (on the cross pipe) to the side of the ex gate. T pieced that vac line close to the IC pipe and ran one to the blow off valve (like it is stock) and the other to the NC port on the solenoid

Hope that helps

well NO stands for normally open and NC for.... you guessed it normally closed. so you'll only be using one or the other depending on the type of solenoid/set-up you have. not both. so if you are plumbing up the NO line then of course the NC port is connected to nothing.

the top of my ex gate is vent atnosphere and the side is to boost controler so from the side port on gate to com and nc to ic pipe

i have a greddy intake so my bov is vac to intake vac port

so nc must go to IC pipe dose it matter what side of IC it is or can it go to intake vac port

where dose map sensor go do it go to 1 of the intake vac ports

people dont have to answer and they might not

do some research yourself or make it easier for people to understand what you are trying to achieve

try drawing a diagram and posting it up - you might get a quicker response

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Great interview on damper settings and coil selection by HPA https://www.facebook.com/HPAcademy/videos/30284693841175196/?fs=e&s=TIeQ9V&fs=e
    • Yeah, it was a pretty deep dig.
    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...