Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Look, some have been told (by the dealer) there WILL be track warranty (i have) some have been told otherwise. That's the issue, we don't know what's going on. It looks like we'll be asked to sign more "agreements" at time of delivery. That's crap.

Personally i dont expect (or even want) "track warranty" and i certainly am not about to have the car inspected before and after every track day. I've spent many tens of thousands on track days over the last two to three years (motor builds/maintenence, brake kits, suspension kits, many many sets of RE55's and Dunlops, you name it) - a lot of us do pay to play and know what it costs to 'track' a car.

Do any other manufacturers stipulate pre and post track day inspections to keep warranty?

I have done plenty of Track Days, Skid Pan days etc. I even told the sales rep of this when I signed my order, however not once was a mention made of ...Oh by the way...no warranty on the track. I am sick of having the goal posts moved.

I do not mind a no warranty for vehicle abuse, however track use is not vehicle abuse....especially when the car is marketed the way it is. I understand if I am buying a commodore and it breaks on the track...because that is not what it was built for....however a GTR was built for the track...it was designed to beat the 911 Turbo on the track....so don't now tell me that this car was deigned for one thing...but now please do not use it for that.

Oh well....anyone want to buy a GTR ...white etc in about 3 - 4 weeks.

I understand if I am buying a commodore and it breaks on the track...because that is not what it was built for....however a GTR was built for the track...it was designed to beat the 911 Turbo on the track....so don't now tell me that this car was deigned for one thing...but now please do not use it for that.

I dont know where you get some of your info from Gibbo but GTR was NOT designed for the race track. It happens to be darned good at going around a track but its designed primarily as a street car. It comes with subwoofers, TVs, average comfy seats, road style brakes, and an auto mode to make it drive like a 'normal car'. Track cars come with semi-comp tyres, factory roll cages, light weight etc. Different kettle of fish to R35 (think GT3, Superleggera et al)

You will NEVER have warranty on a track with the GTR....or at least if you do Australia will be the first GTR market in the world to offer it :(

Personally i dont expect (or even want) "track warranty" and i certainly am not about to have the car inspected before and after every track day.

Exactly the reason we decided to use an import as the Willall trackday GTR. We cover our own warranty and servicing requirements as most of you would already know. Sure not everyone is in the position to do this, but we didnt want to be held to ranson by a car company that had already made it public that the vehicle would be extremely expensive to maintain at a dealer level if you wanted to keep this very intangible thing known as a warranty. That...and I dont want some apprentice thrashing my car - hence we look after our own.

Our Aussie GTR may never see the track and only be subject to normal servicing :(

Exactly the reason we decided to use an import as the Willall trackday GTR. We cover our own warranty and servicing requirements as most of you would already know. Sure not everyone is in the position to do this, but we didnt want to be held to ranson by a car company that had already made it public that the vehicle would be extremely expensive to maintain at a dealer level if you wanted to keep this very intangible thing known as a warranty. That...and I dont want some apprentice thrashing my car - hence we look after our own.

Our Aussie GTR may never see the track and only be subject to normal servicing :(

Most people i know who do regular track days don't RELY on warranty to address things that need attention (from a track day perspective). Actually i dont know anyone who has. They might use warranty for a broken head unit or some dodgy trim. Or they might get a cracked rotor replaced (the first time they ask).. IF they are lucky.

The point of this thread is to find out what the official Nissan policy is.

Especially in regards to this "inspection" business.

I think Nissan will see a few people walking away from their contracts, or at least refusing to sign these new agreements.

Edited by LSX-438
The point of this thread is to find out what the official Nissan policy is.

Especially in regards to this "inspection" business.

You will find the answer simple, take the car on track and you will have No warranty, doesnt matter what services you do or dont have done :(

So whether you fork out for a dealer money maker (inspection) or not wont make any difference to the status of your warranty. Dont let it bother you :(

Edited by Martin Donnon
And have all the joys of a 10 year old well worn car with the bonus being it will be worth $50K when it comes time to sell it :P

The great news is that they're available everyday for 50k, so buy for 50k, spend 10k on motor, another 5k on induction, 3k on a clutch, 2500 more on ECU, 3k on suspension, then replace parts as they wear out. Skyline GTR fun and laptimes to match without having to wonder if any Nissan reps are taking down licence plates in the pits to go home and report to the boss so they can void warranties.

Although, if you enjoy being held to ransom, paying crazy prices for parts, and still ending up with higher laptimes than a well sorted previous model GTR - then good for you :sweat:

BTW - I look forward to buying a JDM GTR in the future for race only

I personally think that if any perspective buyer of these cars that buys it on a "oh wow ive got a warranty" frame of mind has been sucked into this HUGE marketing program that nissan australia has created....nissan use's the warranty as a deterant for people to stay away from imported models....but we all know that the car is not going to break under normal operating conditions on the public roads....Well big deal....In my opinion the warranty really worth squat.....Im sure high end manufacturers have the same system in place ie ferrari,lambourghini ect .....how do you think those owners feel with car that cost more than twice the amount!i feel the cost of the GTR really isnt that much to let the manufacture hold a strong hold on what you do wth the vehicle.....I look at things like this .....the cost of the 32 GTR when it was released in comparison to the cost of a house back then.....and the 35 GTR and the cost of a house these days....the gap is quite larger now.....you track it and break it ....big deal wear it....just enjoy the car and drive it as hard as your pockets will allow you too

Unless you have actually driven an R35, or spent some of your hard earned on one, you really shouldnt post dumb shit like that.

Its a lot of fun, and the costs are reasonable. Its a $160,000 performance car not a clapped out 20 year old grey import from Salt Road City.

the vast majority of people would see track days where each lap effectively costs in the vacinity of $200 as being an absolute f**king rip-off, regardless of how perfect each 200ms gearshift is.

maybe you should get a grip on reality before posting dumb shit like that :)

I personally think that if any perspective buyer of these cars that buys it on a "oh wow ive got a warranty" frame of mind has been sucked into this HUGE marketing program that nissan australia has created....nissan use's the warranty as a deterant for people to stay away from imported models....but we all know that the car is not going to break under normal operating conditions on the public roads....Well big deal....In my opinion the warranty really worth squat.....Im sure high end manufacturers have the same system in place ie ferrari,lambourghini ect .....how do you think those owners feel with car that cost more than twice the amount!i feel the cost of the GTR really isnt that much to let the manufacture hold a strong hold on what you do wth the vehicle.....I look at things like this .....the cost of the 32 GTR when it was released in comparison to the cost of a house back then.....and the 35 GTR and the cost of a house these days....the gap is quite larger now.....you track it and break it ....big deal wear it....just enjoy the car and drive it as hard as your pockets will allow you too

I mostly agree. However I dont think the average person expects Nissan to sponsor their on-track fun HOWEVER some Nissan reps ARE saying the will have warranty for the track, others are saying this post track day inspection is merely a mechanism to keep regular (road only) warranty. Bah. This is a breakthrough vehicle in many respects which sets new benchmarks and costs half the price of the competition, it's going to bring new people to the segement and brand - as such they are all going to have various expectations. People are just confused. It doesnt make them wrong or stupid. Having said all that why would Nissan Australia care when the cars are basically selling themselves and their stock availability has been halved. To be frank if i were a dealer i wouldnt care, at least not now, all the cars are sold.

The interesting part for Nissan is that if they decide to basically end all warranty if you do anything small to the car or take it to a track then people simply won't bother taking their cars to Nissan for services etc. And the fact is all the dealerships have paid truck loads to set-up for servicing these cars so really it is in their best interests to ensure customers do come back to them. As people have alluded too - the servicing side of this could be the real cash cow for Nissan so they wouldn't want to stuff that up.

The U.S also have a post track inspection thing which basically entails them plugging the car into a PC to read the temps and determine if things fluids etc need changing. Their experiences seem to be good on this particular service.

http://www.nagtroc.org/forums/index.php?sh...cotts+GTR+track

So right now we are all just speculating on what is going to happen in the real world. The other fact is really these cars have been around in Japan and the US for 18months and really we haven't heard of a single warranty issue with these things other than related to the transmission coupled with the old LC and yet I have read plenty on them being tracked and seen several of them around as Targa cars.

For anyone that wants to seriously track these things chances are you'll do things to the car to void the warranty regardless, but if you are just someone who wants to track the car once or twice to see what it can really do then follow the rules and you should be right. Mine will be seeing the track definitely (but not regularly - I have the R34 for that) as well as having a couple of small bolt on parts (I have one from Martin sitting in my office already!) and I won't be letting the threat of warranty stop me from using it. If something does happen we'll tackle it when the time comes. But if anyone thinks that doing even a basically track day doesn't cost more than the price of admission then they are deluded!

the vast majority of people would see track days where each lap effectively costs in the vacinity of $200 as being an absolute f**king rip-off, regardless of how perfect each 200ms gearshift is. maybe you should get a grip on reality before posting dumb shit like that :D

Well seeing as you probably havent driven anything racier than a keyboard, and obviously never been on a track let me explain.....

Race tyres R888 or similar at $2000 a set, decent brake pads at $1200 a set, brake fluid, brake rotors, engine servicing, cost of the day, licence costs, wear and tear on the vehicle.....it doesnt matter if its an R32, R33, or R34 or a Commodore, this is how much track days cost if you want to go quickly. Sure anyone can tootle around in a stock car gettting in everyones way and not wear anything out, but for anyone serious about speed you have to spend money. Sorry to break it to you that racing cars costs money, I know its a shock :)

I mostly agree. However I dont think the average person expects Nissan to sponsor their on-track fun HOWEVER some Nissan reps ARE saying the will have warranty for the track, others are saying this post track day inspection is merely a mechanism to keep regular (road only) warranty. Bah. This is a breakthrough vehicle in many respects which sets new benchmarks and costs half the price of the competition, it's going to bring new people to the segement and brand - as such they are all going to have various expectations. People are just confused. It doesnt make them wrong or stupid. Having said all that why would Nissan Australia care when the cars are basically selling themselves and their stock availability has been halved. To be frank if i were a dealer i wouldnt care, at least not now, all the cars are sold.

I dont think its as much as a break through as the 32 GTR....They really done a great job with that car....remember back then there was no such car at all....I dont remember such a big stink from nissan when the 32 came out.....the earlier models have done the work to help this vehicle evolve,Im sure theres not such big problems in japan....its the doing of the dealers here....damn them to hell

The way I see it, and please forgive me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't the prudent method of dealing with Nissan oz go something along these lines? ;

Don't inform them you'll be tracking the car (and remove # plates)

Hook up with one of the identities that now have the applicable R35 Consult in hand to wipe codes and track use data (a big one, I'm only assuming the consult is capable of erasing memory or portions of memory)

Have Nissan Oz do normal warranty and service repairs to "keep them in your pocket" as such, but supply your own consumables such as gearbox oil (Martin's at half price), and rotors etc.....

I dont know where you get some of your info from Gibbo but GTR was NOT designed for the race track. It happens to be darned good at going around a track but its designed primarily as a street car. It comes with subwoofers, TVs, average comfy seats, road style brakes, and an auto mode to make it drive like a 'normal car'. Track cars come with semi-comp tyres, factory roll cages, light weight etc. Different kettle of fish to R35 (think GT3, Superleggera et al)

You will NEVER have warranty on a track with the GTR....or at least if you do Australia will be the first GTR market in the world to offer it :rolleyes:

Martin,

Where do I get my information...well obviously I should have asked you because from your posts to date you are a self proclaimed expert on all things track and GTR. Well done we should all aspire to your dizzying heights of knowledge and wisdom.

Maybe I based my post on the vast publicity and emphasis that Nissan put on their Nurburging lap times in both the wet and dry, the fact that the image when waiting for the GTR site to load is a race track. The fact that they claim it is "The Supercar for anywhere, anytime" ...oh anywhere except the track.

They also claim under the tyres: "Are specifically designed for high speed driving around the race track"

Their claims of how it performs and corners on the track at upto 300km/h.

Feel free to have a read of all their claims and multiple references to track use and performance on their own website.

http://www.nissangtr-au.com/en/web_GTR/GT-...d=1&subid=1

You are right...jeez where did I get my information from.

You own a R35 then great, You track it, even better...if you actually race it as well, then fantastic....but really your opinions matter little on what you think is a stupid question asked by other posters. We are discussing the extra paperwork that Nissan has sprung on purchasers and new requirements for track cars.

Just for the record, Nissan has provided track advanaced driving days for 350z owners in the past as part of their purchase package, Mazda did the same thing for the RX-8 both manufacturers covered cars for warranties on the track days and subsequent days they ran.

I will repeat the main point from my last post....I agree that warranties should be void for Vehicle abuse, however for track use (DO NOT READ RACE USE)...when clearly this is what the strength of this car is and what it is publiscised for by both Nissan and subsequently the media, then I believe that their about face and the requirement to sign a waiver is completely unreasonable.

Agree with my comment or not...personally I don't care...however I am sure that other people who actually are buying or intend to buy a GTR here in Australia should be made aware of all the little extras that Nissan are raising, because they sure as hell did not make any of this known when orders were being place and if as you say it was never intended as a track car, well then they should have had off of this in the first waiver they got us to sign a couple of months back.

But hey what do I know.....

Edited by Gibbo_R35
I personally think that if any perspective buyer of these cars that buys it on a "oh wow ive got a warranty" frame of mind has been sucked into this HUGE marketing program that nissan australia has created....nissan use's the warranty as a deterant for people to stay away from imported models....but we all know that the car is not going to break under normal operating conditions on the public roads....Well big deal....In my opinion the warranty really worth squat.....Im sure high end manufacturers have the same system in place ie ferrari,lambourghini ect .....how do you think those owners feel with car that cost more than twice the amount!i feel the cost of the GTR really isnt that much to let the manufacture hold a strong hold on what you do wth the vehicle.....I look at things like this .....the cost of the 32 GTR when it was released in comparison to the cost of a house back then.....and the 35 GTR and the cost of a house these days....the gap is quite larger now.....you track it and break it ....big deal wear it....just enjoy the car and drive it as hard as your pockets will allow you too

spot on troy. nissan have done an excellent job of scaring people off grey imports with their warranty talk. but in the end they impose so many conditions and the warranty is not exactly amazing anyway. plus they keep changing the rules and adding nice hidden charges. I know plenty of people now with grey R35s and they are all happy with their choice. some have now been enjoying their car (and the savings) for a year now! hell some of them may have had enough of it by now and be ready to sell it before the first ADM car is delivered.

I dont think its as much as a break through as the 32 GTR....They really done a great job with that car....remember back then there was no such car at all....

you are not the only one. speaking recently to one of the japanese nurburgring R35 test drivers he commented that while the R35 was an amazing car he felt that the R32 was more impressive for what it achieved in 1989 in comparison to other cars at that time.

The way I see it, and please forgive me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't the prudent method of dealing with Nissan oz go something along these lines? ;

Don't inform them you'll be tracking the car (and remove # plates)

Hook up with one of the identities that now have the applicable R35 Consult in hand to wipe codes and track use data (a big one, I'm only assuming the consult is capable of erasing memory or portions of memory)

Have Nissan Oz do normal warranty and service repairs to "keep them in your pocket" as such, but supply your own consumables such as gearbox oil (Martin's at half price), and rotors etc.....

This is good in theory but the ConsultIII you can buy cannot wipe the black box data.

The ownership of one that can is tightly restricted to NHPC dealerships. Yeah a couple may have gotten out but not realistic to hope for access to one.

People have reverse engineered the black box enough to get the log data out now but in terms of resetting the data it's probably a longer road ahead.

martin makes some valid points. an R35 is a big step away from a highly modified R32/33/34 GTR. their performance really is amazing and it's no surprise that they cost a lot to maintain and that that cost skyrockets if you want to drive it hard on the track. an R35 may have "only" 500hp but I can tell you for sure it will smoke a 32/33/34 with 500hp even though it weighs more. it's not just about the numbers. if it were the car would be slow as peak power vs weight is not that impressive. BUT it's how it makes that power, it's how the AWD functions, it's how that gearbox works and how the whole package works that makes it so damn fast. and it's at it's most impressive on the street on some nice twisty roads. sure it's fast on the track too, but it's outright lap times are only about on par with a well driven, decently modified 32/33/34 track car. but the bonus is you can drive it home watching your DVD in your leather seat in quiet comfort. just be ready to pay the bill!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks, I removed the fuse and the relay from the car and made my own circuit with them to test them with a test bulb.  I will look for the wiring diagram and go from there.
    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
×
×
  • Create New...