Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I didnt polish the exhaust manifolds much, too hard to reach some places and you cant really see it under the turbos and everything anyway....

I removed the head studs and used new high tensile bolts (plenty of antisieze too:P) Inside diameter of the pipes is the same as the outlets on the head. No port matching was needed:)

hmtwin.jpg

I did a big write up on polishing on www.calaisturbo.com just look for the editorials.

Originally posted by mambastu

If you'd taken the trouble to read all the posts you'd see that Stimpy says he's running 10psi in the post before mine.....sounds like thats full boost ;)

i did read, there is no such thing as 'full boost'

that term is just thrown around.

maybe, Max Psi or something, or ... how MUCH psi are you running.

But if your runing say, 15psi, does that mean you are at full boost?

:) i think not.

Originally posted by stimps

ermmmm..well im an industrial electrician and i get around 20 bux an hour....and i put in around a years work of my free time (and some of my works time too hehehe) and yeah if you put a figure on it...yeah id say about a years wages.......SHIIIIT.

I simply went the twin turbo way because it meant bigger turbo power for basically bugger all money. Had a spare turbo, did some welding..wallah.

So approx how much do you get a year... do you work 6 hour days or 10 hour days?

But it's good to see, give the person (who cant do it themselves) and idea of just how much it would cost.

Originally posted by R31Nismoid

i did read, there is no such thing as 'full boost'

that term is just thrown around.

maybe, Max Psi or something, or ... how MUCH psi are you running.

But if your runing say, 15psi, does that mean you are at full boost?

:)  i think not.

Eh ? Do you actually read what you type ?

Max PSI, Max Boost, Max bar....its all the same ;)

Stimps, all your pictures have disappeared bud :)

Originally posted by mambastu

Eh ?  Do you actually read what you type ?

Max PSI, Max Boost, Max bar....its all the same  ;)

;)

you read :bahaha:

Define the term full boost... lol.

Put it this way... i wask you what RPM you him 'full boost'

what is full boost? :rofl: :bahaha: :bahaha:

Thats splitting hairs a bit isnt it?

Full boost in my book is the max boost that is being run, so it may be 1 bar if you are running 1 bar, or 1.5 if you are running 1.5bar boost.

If you dont know what max boost someone is running, then yes, the terms full boost or max boost by themselves would be very arbitary.

Hi guys, from what I can tell from the previous posts, Stimps could have bought all the bits, got the satisfaction from fitting them himself, worked the saved hours in his job and put $10K in the bank. Ohh and when he sold the car he would get more for it because it would be full of "brand name" parts.

Add it up for yourself, it's frightening.

I prefer the middle route, where I do as much as I can, but when the fabrication hours look too high, I buy the parts and fit them.

Interesting thread this one

Apparantly a stock GTS has 187 kw of power, vs a GTR making 206kw of power stock. The GTS weighs less than a GTR and without doing the calc, it was told to me that the GTS-t has a better power to weight ratio.

So the GTS-t is faster, provided both are factory stock.

Provided the GTR really has 206KW... which i think we all know it doesn't... closer to 220kw. I think i speak for everyone here when i say i have never seen a bog stock GTST drag off a bog-stockGTR and win... I have seen a light-modified GTSt drag off a bog stock GTR.... and loose. And power to weight isn't everything either... there are a multitude of other factors.

Originally posted by Sydneykid

Provided the GTR really has 206KW... which i think we all know it doesn't... closer to 220kw. I think i speak for everyone here when i say i have never seen a bog stock GTST drag off a bog-stockGTR and win... I have seen a light-modified GTSt drag off a bog stock  GTR.... and loose. And power to weight isn't everything either... there are a multitude of other factors.

such as area under the curve. If you dynoed both stock cars, I think the GTR would show more usable power area under the torque curve which in turns makes the car faster. Even tho both cars may have the same peak power output. The GTR has broader power delivery due to more turbo, and the cam profile is slightly more agressive. Correct me if im wrong but I think this is mostly the case.

Sydneykid : the only brand name parts I have installed are a malpassi fuel regulator, and Haltech E6k. I bought the plenum, and modified it slightly. Everything else is more or less other stock parts modified or home made (pipework etc) If you wanted to include them, I guess you could add a Link Lambdameter and E boost boost controller to the list too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok guys thank you very much. GCG highflow it is then 🙂 
    • forgot to mention that when it does this it does not kill the engine, but I have not kept the pedal down long enough to let it, as I see no reason to beat up on it as its got to be something simple, small and dumb causing this.  And as soon as I let off pedal, the engine returns to its normal super smooth operation and rpms re-stabilize quickly, once below 4k. 
    • neither stumble or cut really seem to be an appropriate term....hard to explain its like a rev limiter but at 4k, but it violently shakes engine and entire vehicle as the rpms will not rise over 4k, even with slow acceleration. as soon as it hits 4k, it sounds like entire spark is lost entirely. plugs were 1.1 which I used as such, but later put in new plugs gapped down to .8 changed back after issue arose when I replaced the coils, still does it with either plug gap...damn and it was all running so good.
    • Oh how times have changed! I actually lean it out relative to my water/methanol injector duty cycle. The methanol adds a lot of fueling and you can then lean it out even more due to reduced knock. 
    • Yeah my thoughts are the same, a well thought out WMI setup, would be slightly ahead of just straight E85 and you're also chemically intercooling the charged air, dropping it even further. This is why you need to add so much more fuel as soon as you spray. I remember someone taking me through their set up before (Dennis, has a R33, lives around Cabramatta - no idea if he's still around on this forum). He would target AFR 10:1 on 98, then as WMI ramped on, AFR would lean back up to 11:1. Amazingly, he did this all through his PowerFC, a relay to cut power to his EBC solenoid if there was not enough line pressure on his WMI kit. And of course, if there wasn't any boost made above gate pressure, you wouldn't be accessing the load cells with heaps of timing for WMI. One downside to that rudimentary setup, once the WMI came on, the EBC would unleash the dragon, and of course all the timing. Tyres would fry lol.
×
×
  • Create New...