Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yea well if he has it up for 15k he will probley get 13 - 13.5k.

and turbo skylines are worth less then non turbos....

because by the time people are off there Ps they can afford something better then a 10k r33

The only NA R33 Skyline I would pay anywhere near that much for is Eug's, or perhaps one with a sound system, kit, custom re-spray, custom interior and nice rims.

Anyone who says turbos are worth less than NA's are kidding themselves. I've been scouting the market for the last 4 months and the average turbo is still at least several thousand more than the average NA.

hannibaal king im not gona have a go at you... but honestly i know 6 year olds with more common sense than you.

If someone where to put up 10 advertisments for r33s on carsales for 100k each would you believe thats what they are worth??

some of these 12k r33 n/as have been on carsales for up too 3 years..... dosent mean thats what they are worth..

So what is a good price for a na do u think

It varies quite a bit, I've been watching the R34 market very closely and as far as I can tell it goes like this;

Low end: stock automatic sedan: $10,000-$13,000.

Middle: Stock coupe automatic: $13,000-$14,000.

High end: Stock coupe manual: $15,000-$16,000.

R33 market I'd say would be in the range of $6,000 for your shitters to $10,000 for your late model really clean examples.

This is for pretty much stock cars with only minor mods.

g-t-r if you were sking me on prices?

i believe kezr33 has summed it up excellantly, except the prices start much lower in the r33, i looked at a manual gts coupe r33 s1 with full gtr bodkit for 3grand only prob was body was quite rough and hadnt been in rego for a few years.

having test driven a r34 25gt-four, it felt sluggish compared to my r34 25gt. i'd personally only go the AWD if it was turbo, but not an option for us p-platers!

I would love a GT-FOUR R34.

N/As are sluggish regardless. I want a GT-FOUR so I can dumb an N1 block in there once I'm off my P's.

g-t-r if you were sking me on prices?

i believe kezr33 has summed it up excellantly, except the prices start much lower in the r33, i looked at a manual gts coupe r33 s1 with full gtr bodkit for 3grand only prob was body was quite rough and hadnt been in rego for a few years.

i dont think $3000

well that says it all there natho

body was quite rough and hadnt been in rego for a few years.

where was it for sale on??

Yeah would be good if they had a section in the for sale whole cars where you could select

Turbo skylines

Na skylines

And other cars

hey

yeh thats what i mean.

or even just on the n/a part of the forum

just a for sale thread just for non turbo cars

that would be awsome!

I got a R34 GT-four. At the moment it feels pretty slow but takes a beating. Can do 7k launches and no problems. Ive done just about every suspension mod to it aswell as 34 gtr brembo's. Will be putting a 26/34 in it later this year early next.

No way i could sell it under 30k tho.

tell you what you need then - fatter tires and and service (and highflow filter)

the NAs are quick off the line when you launch them right (between 3-4k) quicker than a turbo even.

but a turbo converted NA....thats another story all together :):D:D

  • 4 weeks later...

yeh mate

i have a R33 GTS4 S2- when i first got it i didnt like the ATTESA system simply because i couldnt do any burnouts :blush: now that i have grown up abit, i realise all the cruises ive been on when i chomped it round hills could have been dangerous if it wasnt because of my ATTESA system. i rely on it and i personally think having a 100kg safty net is better than doing a few burnouts.

awd is probably safer option

but the thing is learn to drive a rwd and awd is a piece of cake

should get a gts and do a few track days or even hit up the skidpan

on the road just drive safe until u get used to ur car

its as simple as that

and rwd is more fun!!! :)

btw i wouldnt pay more than 10k for a 33 gts

i bought mine last year for that with 86k on the clock (96 s2)

and anyway when u get off ur p's wouldnt u just sell up and buy a turbo?

i too thought of chuckin the rb26 into my gts

but at the end of the day its alot of work and money

something u really need to thing about

but hey if u got the money go nuts :thumbsup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...