Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Title basically states it all, looking at getting a R33 Greddy Style Intake Manifold for my N/A R34, But Ive noticed that the IACV (im sure there are other things) and the manifold in general are different to the R33, so it would seem?

I know it'll bolt onto the motor and all, but wondering if all the other gear will bolt onto the manifold properly? Someone im sure has looked into this deeper than i can (dont have an r33 sitting here to compare to :verymad:) So anyone who can shed light on the situation would be gretly appreciated

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/261360-aftermarket-plenum-on-rb25de-neo/
Share on other sites

Upon further inspection it would seem the Neo used an idle control motor on the side of the TB, Where r33 uses an aac valve? correct me if im wrong?

But the question still remains, although if im right, im thinking the standard TB wont fit on a forward facing plenum, leaving the motor with no idle control? I need to look into it some more as im probably wrong.

EDIT: so the neo has an AAC valve also, ive just confused myself, back to square one!

Edited by Silver_GT

I personally wouldnt do it, the price for a greddy plenum isnt worth the gains you would make. If anything, with the shorter runners on the greddy plenum you would lose down low torque, which the rb25de neo has bugger all to start with. That with the piss weak cams the neo has from factory and you dont really have a winner.

But if you must, get the plenum, use a q45 throttle body (bolts straight on and its near on 90mm) and use a r33 aac valve, everything else should work ok. You may need to space the fuel rail since the neo is top feed and the non=neo is side feed (which the greddy plenum is designed for).

If you wanted to spend $1500 on a foward facing plenum (thats what they are worth these days brand new) + $150 for a Q45 + $300ish for other parts, i would source a stock gtr plenum with individual throttles and get it adapted to your head. You'll probably come out with a simular bill but individual throttles > 90mm throttle body

Cheers mate, i was thinking something like using an r33 aac aye, still dunno if im gonna bother, was gonna get a china copy, it'd be purely for looks, but im guessing that the variable butterfly thing in the standard plenum isnt there for no reason? it probly help with low down torque or something? who knows.

Also i hate how the factory plenum goes over the top of the motor, kinda silly if you ask me, but im no engineer and i might just save the forward-facing plenum for if and when it gets a turbo, althought if i end up doing it a write up will be done for all to see :thumbsup:

The intake plenum on the R34 GT from what I can see is designed to help power delivery with it being naturally aspirated.

The variable valve in the plenum is a hinderence under boost. I get 1-2PSI increase after that valve opens completely at around 4500revs.

The intake plenum on the R34 GT from what I can see is designed to help power delivery with it being naturally aspirated.

The variable valve in the plenum is a hinderence under boost. I get 1-2PSI increase after that valve opens completely at around 4500revs.

mate pull the plug on the solenoid for that valve and it'll stay open all the time (pretty sure its default is open ay) its not hard to find, back of the motor, left side on top of the rocker cover

I thought it was more to do with running a constant 12v signal to keep it open? If it's just that simple then I'll do it, after having a chat to my tuner to make sure it's not going to mess up the AFR's.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
    • My heads are cathedral port! It's likely possible, but I don't want to add any extra moving parts (I know they don't move) between the heads, manifolds, etc. It will also affect how injectors/fuel rails etc sit and I don't really know if it would change how the FAST manifold goes/sits/fits. I have the LS6 steam pipes already as I have a very late LS1 block so it should be fine. I couldn't find anyone who had ever actually used one for this purpose, it seems 100% of people grind the water pump. The thermal spacers are 12mm and are half way to the cost of the newer water pump anyhow... so if it comes to that I suppose I'd rather buy a new pump. The bearing in the pump I do have is a little.. clunky, but it hasn't done that much time and I never noticed it when the car was together in the past few years, so..
    • The bushing has failed, not all that uncommon for a car of this age.  Any mechanic should be able to push in a new bushing for you, or you can probably buy the entire lower control arm, complete with bushes.
    • Could you not use "thermal" spacers to give the clearance, like the ones I used between the blower and head? That raised the manifold height by around 10-15mm Albeit the ones I used were for cathedral ports, but I assume they have similar for rectangular ports????
    • Thanks Paul I reached out to Autotainment but they no longer work on JDM cars as the guy who used to do the work moved on and is no longer doing that kind of work. I am talking with Level Up Audio though.
×
×
  • Create New...