Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone,

Not sure if this has been covered before but I am interested to see what people think of these two turbos and how they rate for value for money.

To my understanding a R34 highflow can make up to 260 rwkw with all the supporting mods on a RB25 with good response.

And a 2835 pro s can make safe power up to 270 rwkw with all supporting mods with good response aswell.

Now the punchline, R34 highflows go for around $1000 second hand (obviously double brand new) and the 2835 for over 3200 on Slide.

So thats almost similiar power for 1/3 of the price second hand!

Does anyone have of there own experiences to shed some light on this situation? I would love to hear how either of these turbos drive and what you think is the better buy.

Thanks,

Mike

a 2835 is good for more than that... many people have around 280rwkw...

i have 270rwkw on pulp and that's with an exhaust cam gear robbing my top end for a meatier bottom

the 2835 has great response (i'm @ 18psi by 3500)

on e85 i'm making 311rwkw @ 18psi.

personally if i had to buy it on today's prices i'd go a garrett 3071

what about that hypergear hiflow? It's not BB but it uses garett internals and new only costs $900 ? something to consider if on a tight budget ... that extra money can buy a lot of nice supporting mods :)

I guess it depends on the sort of rear housing that you do have. Some of RB25det Neos was released with .63 rear. The high flow can get even more power if that is the case.

If not then better off getting a GT2835Pro S.

Edited by hypergear

Good thread Michael, i will be watching this one as i will be looking an an upgraded turbo quite soon. But as there are so many options its tough to decide.....

But as lots of people say on here, do it once, do it right. So thinking of getting a turbo that is not MAXXED out, just for piece of mind.

But why a 3071? Sure a great turbo, but i plan to track my Rb25 and want to keep it fairly reliable so the 300rwkw a 3071 would easily give me would go to waste on a standard motor.

the HKS 2835ProS is a 56mm compressor with custom HKS turbine cover and 71mm 56 trim compressor, a GT3071 is (usually nowadays) a 60mm turbine in a garrett turbine housing and a 71mm 56 trim compressor. both 450hp compressors (more or less)

sounds pretty similar eh. the HKS turbine covers are a nice bit of kit but they cost a lot more money.

the hi-flows usually use a very similar 450hp compressor but the turbine is the probably the biggest limiting factor due to the factory turbine housing.

for 300rwkw then GT3076 is the most likely reliable way of getting there for a reasonable price.

But is it really worth it getting a 3071 or a 2835 when you can have a second hand highflow for 1/3 of the price and only 20kw less?

Is there that much of a difference in feel between these turbos hence the much higher price tag?

i think you are comparing three glasses of mainstream beer and wondering which one is better.

they are all good choices (assuming 2nd hand hi-flow is in good nick).

they all taste about the same.

they all get the job done.

the biggest issue is that the hi-flow may make a little less power up top (or it may not) but should be pretty line ball down low and mid BUT it should bolt straight on. factory oil, water lines, intake and dump pipe all bolt back on exactly.

the GT3071 and HKS units will have various levels of fiddling around to get it fitted and running potentially adding to the expense.

so if you are happy with 240-250rwkw and save >$1000 then it is hard to argue for spending more money when you will probably spend less than 5% of your time on WOT.

there are heaps of threads on these turbos so it is going to come down to a personal choice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have you put an aftermarket oil pressure gauge on and verified your oil pressure?   Noise being on the block, on exhaust side, how high up the block does it seem to be? It could be the VCT system getting cranky, especially if it's mainly at idle, and when warm, as that'll be your lowest point for oil pressure. Could be showing that oil passages / VCT solenoid are blocking.
    • Well, hydraulic lifters will get noisy if they are dirty/fouled in some way, and exactly how that manifests will depend on exactly what schmutz is where. There is a procedure on here somewhere for dismantling and soaking/cleaning them. Replacing them with new is about 50% of the work and about 5% of the money!
    • Thanks for the reply @GTSBoy this is is a hydraulic lifter engine. Yea right i did not realise the lifters were supposed to be compressible while installed. I could push them down but i had to lean almost my while body weight on them.  I have never heard of a lifter/ lifters ticking only at hot idle and getting worse the hotter it gets. I have owned a few jdm cars with noisy lifters. This noise is slightly more subtle, it is more of a sharp gentle metalic tic than the solid and more loud tapping I've heard on lifters. I have used a metal rod, alloy tube, hose and stethoscope and could not find the source of the tick. But it appears to be loudest on the actual engine block behind the exhaust cam gear and next to the oil filter. I had mate (40 year old mechanic) go over it with me and he couldn't find it either..  Could it be a cam seal issue of some sort?  Cheers  
    • This seems problematic and unlikely at the same time. Vanilla RB2Xs have hydraulic lifters. They do have "zero" clearance, but only when running with oil pressure inside them. When not running, you should be able to compress them and obtain heaps of clearance. RB26s and Neos have solid lifters. They should have ~0.3mm and ~0.5mm on the inlet and exhaust respectively. If they have zero clearance then bad things are happening. With nothing else being wrong, it would mean that the valves would be held slightly (ever so slightly) open when they are supposed to be closed and it should have all sorts of problems when running, caused by leakage in/out through the valves. Or, zero clearance can indicate severe valve seat recession. None of it is good. Have you used a piece of hose as a stethoscope to try to localise the noise?  
×
×
  • Create New...