Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm trying now to host it so you can see it better, It wouldn't let me post a bigger pic, I don't really know where your going with this but If I've made a mistake with one of the figures by a few kw thats all it is, is a mistake I tried to calculate it as best I could

Hi Buster, I am not going to scratch around for minor errors in data , just trying to get an understanding, data is my thing remember. From what I can see there is a pretty goodly amount of breathing from 5500 rpm to 7500 rpm. Is there camshafts, porting, inlet and exhaust manifolds etc holding the airflow up?

Originally posted by raist60

GHEY?! Why come in here, single out sydneykid, ask for his opinion then go ****ing nutz when he doesnt agree with you?

Some people like torquey track suited power

Some people like peakey drag suited power

Its a compromise like everything else in this fun game we play. It doesnt matter what someone else thinks of your dyno graph / quart mile times / turbo / haircut / makeup as long as you enjoy your car.

true, there is no good and bad turbo otherwise one company would be 'the be all' and the rest would be bunkrupt, its all to do with preference. But I think what is being said that Trust turbos are not a TRUCK turbo, they are performance turbos which have proven themself. And in Busters case he has a proved it.

Nothing to do with these averages and genius maths figures, i mean damn as long as it does what he wants it to do, and produces good results, its fine right? there might even be be better but everything comes at a cost.

It has tomei 264, 8mm lift cams, It also has a greddy plenum as far as I know its got some description of head work as it was listed in the specs when I bought the car but I have no idea what is done

Other then the plenum (that you don't think much of from reading your previous posts) its pretty well the same mod wise as HPI R34 I thought

i dont want to compare each others prices here.

u know its a material world, people would rather spend the extra dough and product with a name which is also proven. The Beauty of buying say a trust turbo or any name brand is its off the shelf(bolt-on), make it as easy as possible and at the end of the day you know what to expect.

it might not interest people who enjoy life researching every aspect, ins and outs, pro's and con's. but at the end of the day everyone has a different market.

You can get someone to do it all for you etc, and run the risk of them ripping you off, or go in with a set price full instructions and try yourself.

Goes for buying a computer, it would be alot cheaper building it yourself installing the software, than going to Dick Smith/Harvey Norman and buying one off the shelf, but then again everyone may not have the knowledge and experience you do.

referring to previous posts man...i just dont think there is anything wrong with the TD-06, to each there own...and you know that these turbos are much more affordable, especially in the maitanence dep.

and everything comes at a cost...if thats loosing that extra 0.9999~% then there must be something that makes up for it right?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...