Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm strongly sonsidering putting an RB25 Det into my Datsun Syyline. What I want to know is what 1/4 mile times do you do in a stock or semi stock ( maybe turbo upgrade) skyline with RB25DET.

Also what is the kerb weight of your car, mine being 1260 kg I'm trying to get an idea of power to weight ratio. Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/261466-rb25det-how-quick-and-what-weight/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hay mate .. i done 13.9 with my r33 .. full zorst , pod , cooler and a clutch .....

donno if thats good or not but i was happy ...

now im thinknig of getting a hi-flow turbo , safc and i got a bosch fuel pump so should do a lil better ..

The quickest time I've seen with a completely stock R33 is 13.4, and I've seen high 12's with mods but stock turbo. Weight of an R33 is around 1470kgs, so with lighter weight you could expect better results, assuming you can get traction etc.

Where did you see it do a 13.4? R34 GTR's only do a 13.7 pass or so it says...

Almost stock R32 GTR's have done high 12's, so who's driving the R34 :thumbsup:

It's all about 60' times, if you can get your car to hook up properly with a sub 2.0 60', then your in with a shot of a decent ET. The MPH on a stock Skyline is pretty low.

Almost stock R32 GTR's have done high 12's, so who's driving the R34 :thumbsup:

It's all about 60' times, if you can get your car to hook up properly with a sub 2.0 60', then your in with a shot of a decent ET. The MPH on a stock Skyline is pretty low.

So true

So true

Post #10

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Be...-B-t260897.html

Also states on Imports 101 that they only do a 13.7, I know these are only rough figures and its from the internet so probably not dead right but eh...

Edited by Dani Boi

Yeh the GTR should be a low 13, I did a 13.765 with catback and a pod filter in the gts-t

Old stock R33 fuel pumps will start to fail,

they wont make fuel pressure,

your car will run lean,

and you will get more power

and u will run a mid 13

and ur engine will 'explodey poos

I dunno what engine is in ur datto at the moment, but the RB25 is probably going to be heavier?

You should be right for a low 13 second pass if you did the swap (stock engine/turbo with exhaust)

Edited by SKY RYAN
I'm strongly sonsidering putting an RB25 Det into my Datsun Syyline. What I want to know is what 1/4 mile times do you do in a stock or semi stock ( maybe turbo upgrade) skyline with RB25DET.

Also what is the kerb weight of your car, mine being 1260 kg I'm trying to get an idea of power to weight ratio. Cheers

I'd be trying to get weights for your current eng/trans and also rb25det, trans, rad, fans, loom ect ect ect.

Just a guess, but the rb setup might weigh a tad or 10 more, giving you around the same curb weight or more than the r33.

Still it'd be a fun-different thing when finished.

The quickest time I've seen with a completely stock R33 is 13.4, and I've seen high 12's with mods but stock turbo. Weight of an R33 is around 1470kgs, so with lighter weight you could expect better results, assuming you can get traction etc.

I think the R33 are 1360kg.

From factory is was quoted 0-400 = 14.4.

No offence but how would a completely stock R33 would run 13.4?

actually,my nephew done the 13.3 when skyryan went down the drags a few weeks ago. he had the white r33 gtst with black mags. would have only had 200 rwhp - 220 rwhp. depends on suspension and 60" times. i had 290hp and could'nt crack a 13. skylines a 1490kg manual and 1520 auto.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Everyone is too used to learning from places like HPA "how to tune" and what to expect at what point, rather than being able to see "The computer says I'm in cell with Row = 8, column =4, and I can see my fuel is lean, so lets add more" Everyone wants "real units", which helps for someone picking it up for the first time and seeing how bad the tune is if they're not used to touching it.   However, I think for most of us who want to play with it, you're 100% right, we're only needing to learn about it for OUR CAR. Which makes it great, and we don't need to care what the real values are, we just need to know which cell it is, that's causing the lean or rich point, or that we want more ignition timing or less. But again, everyone wants everything super you beaut and nearly self tuning, with VE maps, and a billion compensations...   Though then there's me over here when I'm doing reverse engineering work just reading data in hex format that most people couldn't work anything out from. Yet I can see what's going on.
    • Um. No. Since Matt introduced the TIM it has become a lot easier to deal with the consequences of changing K for AFM and injector swaps. Then, tuning is a f**king doddle. No-one needs to know or care how many grams of air are flowing or any other bullshit. Need more fuel in a cell? Add more fuel. Need more timing in a cell. Add more timing. Need to adjust any of the other tables for warm up and so on? No harder than anything else. Sure - it's not an ECU system for starting from scratch on an arbitrary engine. But then.....it was never supposed to be, not recommended for, and almost never used that way. So.... On your engine, in particular, Nistune/Nissan OEM is about as sophisticated and difficult as banging 2 rocks together. Those ECUs are primitive and simple. There is nothing difficult there. I learnt Nistune from scratch, created new maps with extended axes, interpolated/extrapolated the original maps onto them and tuned my RB20 (basically the same ECU as your 26 ECU) all by myself, more than 20 years ago. And that was long before even TIM.
×
×
  • Create New...