Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Fellas,

My R33 GTST will be tuned soon, I got an RB30 bottom end put on it with a GT3540 0.82

My mechanic is aiming somewhere around 370rwkw mark, however, I do remember somewhere that the Z32 AFM maxes out at like 320 rwkw?

Is this correct?

If so, and it does max out, does this mean I will have to purchase a new ECU and sell my PFC? Or is there a more powerful AFM on the market?

Cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/261493-z32-afm-alternative-help-plz/
Share on other sites

This one maxes out at 500PS (368kW) - http://www.nengun.com/tomei/air-flow-meter-z32

Is that at the engine or at the rear wheels?

Also, is a VH45 AFM bigger and better than the z32? What does that max out at?

I believe the Z32 nengun is selling is the same as the one I got, it's just that Tomei sell them, they are still a genuine nissan part.

Thanks

Alternatively if you split the inlet to 2 pipes, fit an AFM on both pipes, the air flow through each flow meter will be half, so effectively each one would only need to be rated to half the power output (370/2 = 185kw) Effectively you could get away with 2 RB20/25 AFM which are relatively cheap in comparision.

Since the PFC is now only seeing half the airflow you will have to half the injector sizing to keep your AFR the same.

VH45 AFM would be the easier option

Edited by daisu
Alternatively if you split the inlet to 2 pipes, fit an AFM on both pipes, the air flow through each flow meter will be half, so effectively each one would only need to be rated to half the power output (370/2 = 185kw) Effectively you could get away with 2 RB20/25 AFM which are relatively cheap in comparision.

Values in rwkW:

RB26 single - 149 / twin - 299 / 65mm diameter

RB20/25 single - 226 / twin - 453 / 80mm

Z32 single - 255 / twin - 453 / 80mm

Q45 single - 302 / twin - 605 / 90mm

Values in rwkW:

RB26 single - 149 / twin - 299 / 65mm diameter

RB20/25 single - 226 / twin - 453 / 80mm

Z32 single - 255 / twin - 453 / 80mm

Q45 single - 302 / twin - 605 / 90mm

Well I knwo for a fact that's incorrect, when I had my GT2835 Pro S setup, I was making close to 280rwkw and the Z32 was no where near maxing out....

Are your sources credible, where are you obtaining this information from???

Mine was doing 5v at 302rwkw and prior 4.8v at 270rwkw. 444 injectors maxed at 250-260rwkw and needed fuel pressure to get to 300rwkw.

320rwkw with 5.1v. :D

That nengun link - Tomie is just a Z32, 500ps/hp is 'little' over 300rwkw.

I've also seen a Q45 max out earlier than the Z32; not sure what was up with that.

Same dyno the std rb20/25 afm was maxed a little over 180rwkw.

I'm moving away from afm. Looking in to the ViPec 'possibly' there still appears to be a few little niggly's with them though.

Even if the afm is max'd you can still bodgily tune it. The problem is there needs to be a little head room so on those cool nights it doesn't lean out or det.

Edited by TheRogue
Even if the afm is max'd you can still bodgily tune it. The problem is there needs to be a little head room so on those cool nights it doesn't lean out or det.

I am currently running my standard afm at 110%, tuner does not like it though.

Another option that i have seen is to put the guts of the z32 into a 4" pipe, therefore you will have more volume at the a certain flow.

Edited by W0rp3D
I know of 2 25's making 330 plus at 4.9 volts with z32's, I've also tried a q45 that maxed at much less power!

forgot to mention they were both running e85, most likely getting a bigger bang for each gulp! it's so tuner friendly it wouldnt matter if the afm maxed out.

I am currently running my standard afm at 110%, tuner does not like it though.

Another option that i have seen is to put the guts of the z32 into a 4" pipe, therefore you will have more volume at the a certain flow.

I did that and don't really like it. I would at the very least put it in 3.5" pipe instead of 4". It's tough to get to idle correctly, and it's real twitchy at part throttle stuff. We tacked a 2.5" length of intercooler pipe inside the 4" intake pipe around the hot wire and it seemed to help some, but it's still more trouble than it's worth. If you don't want to go MAP, I would look at Ford Lightening MAF's. They also make upgraded MAF's for Lightenings that are supposed to have digital processors and something like 4 or 8 hot wires with a big X in the middle to cut down on turbulence that are good to over 800rwhp that idle like a dream. I'm trying to find them now. Anywho, they are 0-5v hot wire sensors and retail for somewhere around $300 USD IIRC.

Values in rwkW:

RB26 single - 149 / twin - 299 / 65mm diameter

RB20/25 single - 226 / twin - 453 / 80mm

Z32 single - 255 / twin - 453 / 80mm

Q45 single - 302 / twin - 605 / 90mm

This is not right. There are quite a few Z32's with 320RKW + that still use a Single MAF

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sounds good.  I don't 100% understand what your getting at here. When you say, "I keep seeing YouTube videos where people have new paint and primer land on the old clearcoat that isn't even dulled down" do you mean this - there is a panel with factory paint, without any prep work, they paint the entire panel with primer, then colour then clear?  If that's what you mean, sure it will "stick" for a year, 2 years, maybe 3 years? Who knows. But at some stage it will flake off and when it does it's going to come off in huge chunks and look horrific.  Of course read your technical data sheet for your paint, but generally speaking, you can apply primer to a scuffed/prepped clear coat. Generally speaking, I wouldn't do this. I would scuff/prep the clear and then lay colour then clear. Adding the primer to these steps just adds cost and time. It will stick to the clear coat provided it has been appropriately scuffed/prepped first.  When you say, "but the new paint is landing on the old clearcoat" I am imagining someone not masking up the car and just letting overspray go wherever it wants. Surely this isn't what you mean?  So I'll assume the following scenario - there is a small scratch. The person manages to somehow fill the scratch and now has a perfectly flat surface. They then spray colour and clear over this small masked off section of the car. Is this what you mean? If this is the case, yes the new paint will eventually flake off in X number of years time.  The easy solution is to scuff/prep all of the paint that hasn't been masked off in the repair area then lay the paint.  So you want to prep the surface, lay primer, then lay filler, then lay primer, then colour, then clear?  Life seems so much simpler if you prep, fill, primer, colour then clear.  There are very few reasons to go to bare metal. Chasing rust is a good example of why you'd go to bare metal.  A simple dent, there is no way in hell I'm going to bare metal for that repair. I've got enough on my plate without creating extra work for myself lol. 
    • Hi, Got the membership renewal email but haven't acted yet.  I need to change my address first. So if somebody can email me so I can change it that would be good.    
    • Bit of a similar question, apprently with epoxy primer you can just sand the panel to 240 grit then apply it and put body filler on top. So does that basically mean you almost never have to go to bare metal for simple dents?
    • Good to hear. Hopefully you're happy enough not to notice when driving and just enjoy yourself.
    • I mean, most of us just love cars. Doesnt necessarily have to be a skyline.
×
×
  • Create New...