Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

TR43 G2 is running a .63 rear which is what the OP6 Rears are. But with a Vband rear. If you have a OP6 rear already then we can just high flow that. Less headaces when putting every thing back. Response wise I would say its touch bit laggier then before high flow.

TR43 G2 is running a .58 rear which is what the OP6 Rears are. But with a Vband rear. If you have a OP6 rear already then we can just high flow that. Less headaces when putting every thing back. Response wise I would say its touch bit laggier then before high flow.

TR43 G1 trims seem to be making around 240rwkw on 20ish psi on RB20's

so i'm assuming that since a G2 is meant to be 30hp larger your should see around 255-260rwkw on similar boost?

how would this compare with the gt2076r 0.63 internal gate custom tubro you posted a few pages ago?!?

TR43 G2 is running a .58 rear which is what the OP6 Rears are. But with a Vband rear. If you have a OP6 rear already then we can just high flow that. Less headaces when putting every thing back. Response wise I would say its touch bit laggier then before high flow.
TR43 G1 trims seem to be making around 240rwkw on 20ish psi on RB20's

so i'm assuming that since a G2 is meant to be 30hp larger your should see around 255-260rwkw on similar boost?

how would this compare with the gt2076r 0.63 internal gate custom tubro you posted a few pages ago?!?

ok now, so now that is stated.

my theory is IF you are chasing 250 RWKW in a R34 with a OP6 housing the best choice is to HIGHFLOW it.

IF you do NOT have a OP6 your better off going a TR43G2.

when i googled Hypergear i cam across a supra forum and i believe you were making a TR43G3. If so will that bring around 270Rwkw?

regards

Chris

TR43G3 is later on called a TR43i. Yes we've maxed that on a CA at 300rwkws with 24psi of boost. For standard build RB25det engine with 19psi of boost internal gate. it should get some where around 250~270rwkws.

We also managed to high flow GT15 turbo off a single soarer with ATR28G3 spec. The GT15's got lot bigger turbine housings. So in case you got a Soarer with a blown turbo we can also make it work.

machine.JPG

housings.JPG

chra.JPG

turbo.JPG

TR43G3 is later on called a TR43i. Yes we've maxed that on a CA at 300rwkws with 24psi of boost. For standard build RB25det engine with 19psi of boost internal gate. it should get some where around 250~270rwkws.

We also managed to high flow GT15 turbo off a single soarer with ATR28G3 spec. The GT15's got lot bigger turbine housings. So in case you got a Soarer with a blown turbo we can also make it work.

interesting as we do a lot of jzx100's here. Got 2 in car park now :dry:

TR43G3 is later on called a TR43i. Yes we've maxed that on a CA at 300rwkws with 24psi of boost. For standard build RB25det engine with 19psi of boost internal gate. it should get some where around 250~270rwkws.

so what turbo would you suggest to run on a stock rb20 trying to make 260rwkw on 20-24psi of boost?!?

has to be low mount to bolt onto the stock manifold and internal gate with the best response possible...

im thinking the TR43G2 but maybe its not big enough and should go a TR43G3 (aka TR43i???)

Edited by Cerbera

Guy on here used to have one he said 18psi at 3800 (that what he set his PSI too) so for something that could make 300kw thats pritty good, and that was with no cams just injectors afm and ecu and a light tune was 245kw.

So with cams better ecu and right tune sould see some good power.

Oh and it was a GTS-4 so RWD should read higher power.

Edited by raZ1911

Hoo yea. thats that Black R32 guy. Its abit of sad funny as I rang him for a copy of dyno sheet and he was asking me if any one found his car any where.

So is 250-270rwkw your highest rated hi flow for an rb25, i currently have a hi flow with a vg30 rear and core with an rb25 hi flowed front and bigger wheel (specs are HERE ) and i have a blown standard turbo, what are the chances of making something that will get around 300rwkw with an auto?

Assume you have a strong enough Auto box, you need some thing at least in .63 rear housing to do that. We can make a .63 Vband reared ATR28G4 which will get you about 300rwkws at 20~24PSI depends on mods. The OP6 Rears won't do it. But the VL's RB30 .63 rear housing can do it.

Assume you have a strong enough Auto box, you need some thing at least in .63 rear housing to do that. We can make a .63 Vband reared ATR28G4 which will get you about 300rwkws at 20~24PSI depends on mods. The OP6 Rears won't do it. But the VL's RB30 .63 rear housing can do it.

What what the price be on one of those and will the oil and water lines be a direct bolt on or will they have to be custom as well?

The price is $1060 including 14psi internal wastegate and Braided oil feeding line. Your Stock water lines fits. The rear end of the turbo is a 2.75 inch Vband, We supply the O ring for dump pipe making, and most of your local exhaust shops can make the dump made for roughly $200.

The price is $1060 including 14psi internal wastegate and Braided oil feeding line. Your Stock water lines fits. The rear end of the turbo is a 2.75 inch Vband, We supply the O ring for dump pipe making, and most of your local exhaust shops can make the dump made for roughly $200.

Would the hks adjustable wastegate i already have fit?

If its made to suit a T3 turbo It should. It depends on how long your actuator's extender is.

I have it on the hi flow thats on my car atm, dont know how long the rod is ive never screwed it all the way out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Everything I found online said never use it because it'll dramatically reduce belt lifespan.  No, but I have seen excessive v-belt tension cause the audible bearing noise from excessive radial load in things like alternators. So don't overdo it. Ideally you set it to manufacturer spec using a proper belt tension guage. I tried the "clicker" type gauges but those cheap things are trash. They read way too low even when you're careful.
    • This is kind of where I've ended up for the most part. It's easier for me, easier for shops that don't have to deal with my weird criteria/picky standards, etc.
    • Will do. Suprised if it's not the starter motor considering it's 30 years old. Will get a volt meter though. Battery is close to new.   Cheers for your help, always appreciated.
    • This almost never happens these days. No. Clean your battery terminals and make sure they are tight. Use sandpaper on a dowel if you have to, to get oxidation off the inside of the terminals, particularly on the -ve. Check the earth cable from battery post to chassis ground and engine ground. Make sure the contact surfaces are clean - including the threads on the bolts that anchor them - because that's where a lot of the contact occurs. Wire wheel on a drill is a good thing for this. Make sure the crimps on those cables are all sound. Assuming none of that causes an improvement: Check the battery voltage after it has been resting for a while. If it's at the lower end of the range, put it on charge for a while, then see if it will crank better.
    • I just checked my belt, it wasn't super loose but I could bend it past 90 degrees a small amount so I tightened it up and for the first time ever my car didn't crank first time, had to crank it again lol. Don't know if that was because I tightened the belt or if it's my starter motor going out (been having slow starts for some time). Coulda also been when I was recording I didn't crank the key properly and it didn't save the recording lol.   Is that a thing if you overtighten a belt it struggles to start?
×
×
  • Create New...