Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Actually, what kind of power figure would I get on a 0.63 housing? Would an external gate be a better option maybe, since loads of people swear by them?

With RB25det you should get about 260~270rwkws on about 18psi with external gate. The .63 turbines is very good for street response but not very good for big power and torque.

Shipping to WA is $35.

Stao, any result from the 2530 spec turbo yet?

Im aiming for 250rwkw but want response like a HKS GTRS. I have a both the stock 2IU turbo and a stock VL RB30 turbo to work with... maybe mix and match?

Yes I currently have them avaliable in .82, and .84 Twin scroll. The .82 comes with the 6 bolt dump pattern or a 3inch Vband.

This is dynosheet is with ATR43G4 (600hp) profile in .82 turbine and .70 comp

Car's got:

850cc high flowed injectors from Created

Ebay cooler kit

Tomei 260 Duration by 8.5mm lift Cams

3inch exhaust with metal cat.

Tail 38mm external gate vented to atmosphere (drilled on top of stock manifold)

Z32 AFM

Z32 ECU with nistune chip and modified loom

301rwkwsrb25det.jpg

Stao, any result from the 2530 spec turbo yet?

Im aiming for 250rwkw but want response like a HKS GTRS. I have a both the stock 2IU turbo and a stock VL RB30 turbo to work with... maybe mix and match?

Any indication on info like this please? am very interested in your service stao, still need help to make up my mind.

That turbo's currently on a RB20det R32 and Here's his reply. hopefully I'll get a dynosheet soon.

This is a print of his reply in my pm.

post-27032-1266669092_thumb.jpg

Stoa, Have you used a turbine housing like the one you made for me before? I just had my Front pipe and Cat replaced with 3" items and the turbo is now hitting over 15psi with no boost controller. I have loosened the preload on the actuator arm and noticed with how the Vband connecter is on the turbo the wastegate flat have very little room to move. I can take pics if you want to have a look.

Yes I currently have them avaliable in .82, and .84 Twin scroll. The .82 comes with the 6 bolt dump pattern or a 3inch Vband.

This is dynosheet is with ATR43G4 (600hp) profile in .82 turbine and .70 comp

Car's got:

850cc high flowed injectors from Created

Ebay cooler kit

Tomei 260 Duration by 8.5mm lift Cams

3inch exhaust with metal cat.

Tail 38mm external gate vented to atmosphere (drilled on top of stock manifold)

Z32 AFM

Z32 ECU with nistune chip and modified loom

301rwkwsrb25det.jpg

Is this turbo housing 6 bolt oem dump pattern or 3 inch vband?

That dyno is fantastic, its up around 300rwkw for a long time not just at peak rpm!

I have heard the 6 bolt oem style is restrictive, do you find the 3 inch vband is better?

Cran:

The actuator's only got about 8mms of movement so the clearance is enough.

Before the ATR43 were released all TR43 and TR43is were running this type of turbine housings which I haven't had any issues, but most of them were running higher then 15psi.

I advise you to get the car dyno tuned to have the correct afr and timing set.

Hary:

That turbo is running off a 6 bolt dump. The car had abit of miss on high rpms which you see, I think if its not popping it should have a slightly rising curve to about 310~15ish KWs.

Cran:

The actuator's only got about 8mms of movement so the clearance is enough.

Before the ATR43 were released all TR43 and TR43is were running this type of turbine housings which I haven't had any issues, but most of them were running higher then 15psi.

I advise you to get the car dyno tuned to have the correct afr and timing set.

Hary:

That turbo is running off a 6 bolt dump. The car had abit of miss on high rpms which you see, I think if its not popping it should have a slightly rising curve to about 310~15ish KWs.

Thanks,

Have you got any comparisons between 6 bolt oem style and 3 inch vband ?

Cran:

The actuator's only got about 8mms of movement so the clearance is enough.

Before the ATR43 were released all TR43 and TR43is were running this type of turbine housings which I haven't had any issues, but most of them were running higher then 15psi.

Sorry but this just seams strange to me whats the point of a 10psi actuator if the turbo can't manage to do anything under 15psi?

Stock turbo wastegate flap has a hell of a lot of movement compared to this one.

The space specified is enough to the amount of movement by the actuator. Also this is a 1KG actuator so to me its doing what its suppose to do.

any way, with the 6bolt pattern, the overall area is greater then the size of the exducer of the turbine wheel. There would be a slight restriction, but I don't think its would affect any thing more then 5KWs.

Sorry but this just seams strange to me whats the point of a 10psi actuator if the turbo can't manage to do anything under 15psi?

Stock turbo wastegate flap has a hell of a lot of movement compared to this one.

if it is a 1kg actuator the minimum boost will be 14psi not 10psi

Hi Tao

Just reading this and he says his Oil line is too short.. I won't have this problem with my r33 rb25det yeh and everything should fit and line up perfectly??

Thanks

Cesar

That turbo's currently on a RB20det R32 and Here's his reply. hopefully I'll get a dynosheet soon.

This is a print of his reply in my pm.

post-27032-1266669092_thumb.jpg

Edited by Black_CSR

They are sold with a T28 drain flange. It is shorter then the stock T3 flange, so you need to extend it with few inches of power steering horse.

Stao, what company makes your plain bearing CHRA? I know you can make a turbo with a garrett ballbearing CHRA but what are the plain bearing types? where are they made and by who?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh, that's grim. Something bad has been happening there.
    • Put an endoscope down the hole and saw this. Not quite all around the bore but a good 60% at least. Chin to the chest and towards further disappointments I guess.
    • 2 does "sort of" applies, maybe......but looking at what parts would be needed for the swap to get engineered, registered, and insured, and basically that's everything under the car, the modifications the make it legal would be problematic and horrendously expensive, all for a street car that just cruises around and hits a few twisty roads on the weekends Also, from looking at the NSW rules and Regs, with all modifications that is required just to make the car safe and not twist itself to pieces, and then actually get registered for street use, may still be impossible nowadays As for 1, when you add in a fresh engine, fresh transmission, rear cradle and diff, tailshaft, suspension, brakes, cooling, and all the other fabrication required, your probably looking at up to $100k to do it right, all for a 20 year old MX5 that is over engineered and you would never be able to actually use the power it has on the street, much like your beastie, which I love, but you actually track that thing and can use all of its powers in anger, in a safe environment  Hell, the old Bogan Cruise Ship had more power than I could use on the street, and in hindsight, I went a bit silly on that thing, it didn't really need the 500hp it had for what I actually used the car for, it was fun, but basically unusable on the street if you value your licence  As for cams, yeah, I'll probably book it in for them to get installed and tuned soonish, like next month after MX5 Mania are back at work....... and yes, I've already sent a email to bin the turbo quote and quote instead to install cams and a new Fluidampr balancer that will suit the 2.5 better than the OEM 2.0 balancer that is swapped over for the 2.5 install, as the balancer needs to get pulled to time the cams it's a while your in there sort of thing I did think a bit about flex fuel for a laugh, but being na, and no where really around locally anymore to get E85, I've binned that idea, so no sweet sweet corn smells are set for the car I wish E85 was more of a standard fuel, it's better for the environment, better for tuning, plus that sweet sweet smell we all love As for fitting in the family, that's not needed, as everyone in the family already owns a car that can seat 5 humans comfortably enough, the MX5 is "my toy" As for buying a car that is already built, nah, I would rather pick and choose my parts, I enjoy the process, and in the big picture, the additional cost is well worth the enjoyment, and the occasional frustration, I get out of doing it, albeit with other people spinning the spanners, and me, just paying the invoice 🤣
    • Excuse me, but 2) does apply 1) Would also apply if you consider how much is spent in the alternatives. Also there's the option of 3), buy one pre-built that you can put your family in (it's me, it's my car)   That said, I went on a ~500km drive the other day. I didn't use anything more adventurous than 3rd/4th gear at about ~3000RPM and 50% throttle and I was going as fast as anyone has any sense doing on a public road, with enough grip to the point where I didn't want to go any faster. I was obviously under the limit of the current car etc etc. MX5 with 2.5 N/A to achieve the same speed would be more fun for any road scenario. Maybe consider cams. I wouldn't boost it. The use case is just not there and it won't actually make the car more enjoyable unless you really do plan on wringing gears from 1st to 3rd (at least) at 100% WOT on a public road to 150+kmh.
    • Great if: 1. You had all of the money for everything else that is required  2. Lived in a country where you could actually do this and drive it legally on the road Sadly, neither applies to me As for the turbo, I am having second thoughts, mainly for engineering/registration legality reasons and insurance  Not saying I've finished doing stupid things that I probably should do to the MX5, but boost, and V8 engine swaps isn't on the cards Strange, but true 
×
×
  • Create New...