Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

How does the dump fit with a different core on the turbo? or are the cores the same length?

Every thing fits the way it was, they are still your OEM housings. The T2x bearing housing is few mms short. But it doesn't affect installation.

Can possibly high flow it with a BDR351 Comp wheel working with GT45 turbine wheel. Should pump out 1200HP. What sort of housing is it in?

not sure on the rear housing size havent checked yet i would only want it to flow 1000hp anyway would the rear wheel even need changing for that?

not sure on the rear housing size havent checked yet i would only want it to flow 1000hp anyway would the rear wheel even need changing for that?

Depending on the engine size, for 1000HP you will need a 1.2 A/R turbine housing, and 87mm 85T turbine wheel. The T04Z runns of a 74mm 76T turbine wheel which is rated to 700HP, so it needs to go up in size.

Either way its not a cheap exercise so unless your T04Z is blown, its probably worth selling it and buy the T51R which we can supply at a very reasonable price.

Every thing fits the way it was, they are still your OEM housings. The T2x bearing housing is few mms short. But it doesn't affect installation.

My concern with that is if both cores ar 2-3mm shorter than the gap between the turbos opens up 4-6mm, thats enough to mean that double layered gaskets will be needed or it will leak like a sieve.

Very good result for stock Rb20det, how come its so wavy on the top? ignition problems?

It's a hub dyno so they don't have the power dampened by the rollers which usually smooths out the curve... Plus RB20's always have a bit of a wavy top end

No ignition problems at all (had a lot more boost it in and didn't miss at all)

This was with a G2 in .63, My engine blew up on dyno during the next run. Even thou that made the power and response, I still prefer .82 for high performance RB25det. unless if that was a 3576 profile.

.63 works out ok on RB20dets.

You find Rb25det with .82 rear makes power lot easier with less boost and lot less heat.

What would lag be like though? Could it make 250kw at 120kph / 4500rpm ish like that does?

only cos for me i wouldnt be at the top of 4th much on track if at all (drift), or road so thats why i was thinking the .63 could be better for that reason?

Edited by raZ1911

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Is there a diameter difference in the stock to Nismo? If so, the weight alone won't be indicative when comparing flywheels of the same diameter, since the radius of the flywheel acts on the moment of inertia with a square factor, where as mass is linear. Roughly going from a 4.5kg flywheel with radius 20cm, to a 9kg flywheel with radius 14cm would see them act the same. This calc is just here to act as a brief numbers comparison and reflects no actual RB flywheel diameters etc. it also assumes even weight distribution (thickness) throughout.
    • It seems this could be due to a restructure/team direction change... Or... You're working with a different category of vehicle... Or you've decided you'd rather be able to play with your own cars again...   I'm hoping the latter...
    • had 4 weeks off over xmas and well did some stuff to the shed and BRZ, well short of is I don't work full time in supercars anymore as of yesterday.........
    • Did you get any down time over Christmas, or have you had any since to play with this? Or have you given up and are trying to get yourself a second hand V8SC instead?
    • A random thought I had just before I hit "Submit on this post". If brake fluid, in a container in my garage that has never been opened goes bad after 18 months, why can I leave it in my car for 24 months in an "unsealed container"... Secondly, some other digging, and brake fluid manufacturers seem to be saying 5 year shelf life... Me thinks there line on 18 months for an unsealed bottle is pretty much horse shit marketing spin. Kind of like how if you drive a car and don't run a turbo timer your turbo and motor will die horribly...   Where I started on this though... Someone (me) started down a bit of a rabbit hole, I don't quite have the proper equipment to do Equilibrium Reflux boiling per the proper test standards. I did a little digging on YouTube, and this was the first video I found on someone attempting to "just boil it". This video isn't overly scientific, as we don't have a known reference for his test either. Inaccuracy in his equipment could have him reaching the 460 to 470f boiling point range in reality. In the video, using a laser temp gun, he claims his Dot3 that's been open in his florida garage for over a year gets to about 420 to 430 fahrenheit (215 to 221c) Doing some googling, I located an MSDS for that specific oil, and from new, it claims a dry boiling point of 460 to 470f. Unfortunately they don't list a wet boiling point for us to see how far it degraded toward its "wet" point. While watching it I was thinking "I wonder what the flash point is..." turns out its only 480f for that specific brake fluid....   As for testing the oil's resistance, I might not be able to accurately do that unfortunately. Resistance level will be quite a LOT higher than my system can read I suspect based on some research. However, I might be able to do it by measuring the current when I apply a specific voltage. I won't have an actual water % value, but I'll have some values I can compare between the multitude of fluids. I'll run some vague calculations later and see if I should be able to read any reliable amount of current. These calcs will be based on some values I've found for other oils, and see how close I'll need my terminals together. From memory I can get down to 1pA accuracy on the DMM. I don't think my IOT Power Tester has any better resolution.    
×
×
  • Create New...