Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thats a crazy result.. I like the way the torque stacks and fades off. I'd probably want that exact result for myself if I had an R33.

Is the CHRA in that SS2 core any different to the normal SS2?

22psi on e85 and shinnnnnnnnnning Dou dou dou dou

I will upload all the papers when I get a computer tonight. Doing it with my phone and it sucks.

Here is the dyno reading:

kaipower.jpg

Boost:

kaiboost.jpg

Super responsive. Makes That about the same response as the SS1PU. Makes 17psi by 3500RPMs and about 100kws by 3000.

I will upload the videos shortly.

Video footage from today.

Surprisingly after multiple runs, the turbine housing or manifold did not turn red or overly heated. I guess this is the highest no. that a highflowed r33 turbocharger in factory housings has ever archived. This evaluation is pretty successful.

It how ever do cost $200 more then factory high flow option, for the extra work required on modifying standard turbine housing, as well as the high pressure actuator and SS2 billet compressor wheel.

I believe it is good for some where around the 280rwkws when used on stock manifold, internally gated on pump 98 fuel with good supporting mods and tune.

Yes the ATR43SS1 result of it on a Rb20det is on our site. SS1 billet version is updated version with better response. How ever I don't have a result of it based on a Rb25det.

Op6 should net around 370rwkws mark in this combination. I think I can get it close to 400rwkws with a different set of compressor profile. How ever it will be much laggier.

By the way, the SS2.5 is a CHRA made only for RB high flows, specially the 21U R33 housings. Won't be great used in normal housings.

I can also build the SS2.5 using the latest G3 comp wheel. Which will not add any costs to the standard profile while producing identical amount of power.

Standard high flow can get you a very responsive 250rwkws, while the SS2.5 or G3.5 can make more power will be laggy in the op6 rear housing.

I can do a special deal on the evaluation price of the G3.5. PM for further details.

Stao, that highflow is redonkulous.

What would that in an OP6 housing cost?

Every time I settle on a plan you go and do something that throws a spanner in the works....

I will do a special deal at $1160 including oil line. it might not be as responsive in the OP6 rear, how ever that should be reaching close to 370rwkws mark once setup on a proper manifold and gate.

Also releasing one more profile for the 21U turbine housing is the G3.5 This turbocharger is also a specific high flow built chra. it should produce bit more then the SS2.5. Hopefully be seeing towards 350rwkws mark. Its been pretty responsive using the 21U turbine housing.

comp.JPG

turbine.JPG

Few other news is that I've managed to source some R33 copy turbine housings. That will help saving lot of costs building them here. I will pass on the savings and work out a cheaper alternative to high flows very soon.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I’d love to find some where that can recover the dashes to look brand new and original. Mine has a very slight bubble, nothing compared to some I’ve seen though 
    • $170K. I asked one of the guys there as a joke if that price was just for the passenger seat as it was where the price sheet was... he tried really hard to crack a smile 😄 He also mentioned that every single part of the car was inspected and either restored or replaced with a new or as new part, or made from scratch. The interior was incredible, every inch like a new car.
    • Time for a modernisation, throw out the AFM, stock O2s, ECU into the e-waste bin. Rip out the cable throttle, IACV, pedal, etc. into the scrap metal bin. DBW, e-throttle, modern ECU, CANbus wideband, and the thing will drive better than when it left the factory.
    • I agree, don't go trusting those trims. As I said, first step is to put the logger away, and do the basics in diagnosis.   I spend plenty of time with data loggers. I also spend plenty of time teaching "technicians" why they need to stop using their data loggers, and learn real diagnostics.   The amount of data logs I play with would probably blow most people away. I don't just use it to diagnose. I log raw CAN data too, as a nice chunk of my job is reverse engineering what automotive manufacturers are doing.
    • I'm aware, but unless you're actually seeing the voltage the ECU is seeing and you're able to verify the sensors are actually working I find it hard to just trust STFT/LTFT. I will say, logging the ECU comes naturally to me because it's one of the lowest effort methods of diagnosis and I do similar things in my day job all the time. Staring at 20+ charts looking for something that isn't quite right isn't for everyone. NDS1 allows you to log almost everything so that's normally what I do and then sort out the data later. 
×
×
  • Create New...