Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

321rwhp @20psi. 4psi more boost has got me 30hp less than my previous tune.

No symptoms this time. Tuner double checked my cam timing, said I got it spot on. He even tried playing with the exhaust cam gear, but best results were where I had it. Set base ignition timing before it went on the dyno. IAT's are fine, not getting hot. It had no problems taking boost, it wasn't misfiring, it had plenty of fuel. It just doesn't make power. And I'm stumped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow man that's no good. Don't worry though man, if the engine's healthy (certainly sounds like it is) then it's just a matter of time until you find the cause.

Keep methodically checking through the possible causes and you'll nail it eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully not but, are you sure the turbo is ok?

What do the graphs look like?

Mabye the turbo is a dud?

You might need to swap turbo out for a "spare"

See what another turbo does
That way you can rule that out?

Edited by jay-rod
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really think there should be much issues on the design of the turbocharger since every one's made 320hp+ on fair basic mods on stock cams. I'll be happy to check and update it to the most recent profile if Halando is happy to send it.

T04Z I've engineered the comp wheels in couple of different sizes and blade shaps. I like to see what they can do on the GT35 based turbine wheel first. The T04Z turbine might be too laggy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its going to be laggy as on my Rb25det. I guess it doesn't really matter used with launch control. Not sure if my fuel system is good enough for the maximum capability of that turbo, but will post result after I get it build and trailed.

Also was that VL on stock drive shaft? I abit concert it might bent or snap at that sort of power level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeh, has a one piece tailshaft and 31 spline axles..has done 70 odd passes though, although the gearsets(in the diff) are the weak point

having said that, the standard axles and driveshaft will last a fair while on slicks with a manual and forever with a auto

I only ever ran stock 28 spline axles and stock 2 piece driveshaft in my r31,never broke a axle, but busted the original

centre bearing in the driveshaft , reconned it and it was fine..auto though, they are soft on a drivetrain..

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really wish I could get my hands on Martin's car.... I would love to pull the motor and just reassemble everything bit by bit.. Its GOT to have a f**king problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

321rwhp @20psi. 4psi more boost has got me 30hp less than my previous tune.

No symptoms this time. Tuner double checked my cam timing, said I got it spot on. He even tried playing with the exhaust cam gear, but best results were where I had it. Set base ignition timing before it went on the dyno. IAT's are fine, not getting hot. It had no problems taking boost, it wasn't misfiring, it had plenty of fuel. It just doesn't make power. And I'm stumped.

That sucks. This is on BP98? Did the tuner have any comments on anything that he may have found suspicious?

When making less power than expected without misfires or any other obvious issues it is possible you could have one of these things happening (which the tuner will see). I don't clearly remember the history of your car so not sure if I am making redundant comments - sorry!

- Overly knock limited... this can be caused by all sorts of things, easiest to check or identify on your car would be to identify if the CAS triggering seems to be working properly

- Reaching MBT sooner than you'd expect (not due to knock - just not gaining torque as the timing advances) can happen if something is stopping cylinder pressures from climbing they should, can be a valve actuation issue

- Fuel demand lower than you'd expect, or falling over. I'd tend to put this down to a restriction, as it basically means your overall volumetric efficiency is down due to something - if you need less fuel than another car making the power you expect you should, and with the same target AFRs, then it means less air is passing through the system. You aren't going to make the power without the air flow required to do so

Just a couple of quick thoughts, may or may not be worth anything - but this situation of you having issues has been going too long and it'd be good to see you with a happy result so anything at this point can't be a waste, right? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

very interested to se how the ss2 vnt turbo goes for the 330rwkw mark may be better choice then a t67 in my drift car if the response is there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both billet SS2 and SLSS2 are more responsive with higher output then a normal T67. Check page 388.

The VNT model is targeting towards SS1 .64's response while making SS2's power. I will post further details as it gets installed and tuned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sucks. This tune on BP98? Did the tuner have any comments on anything that he may have found suspicious? When making less power than expected without misfires or any other obvious issues it is possible you could have one of these things happening (which the tuner will see). I don't clearly remember the history of your car so not sure if I am making redundant comments - sorry! - Overly knock limited... this can be caused by all sorts of things, easiest to check or identify on your car would be to identify if the CAS triggering seems to be working properly - Reaching MBT sooner than you'd expect (not due to knock - just not gaining torque as the timing advances) can happen if something is stopping cylinder pressures from climbing they should, can be a valve actuation issue - Fuel demand lower than you'd expect, or falling over. I'd tend to put this down to a restriction, as it basically means your overall volumetric efficiency is down due to something - if you need less fuel than another car making the power you expect you should, and with the same target AFRs, then it means less air is passing through the system. You aren't going to make the power without the air flow required to do so Just a couple of quick thoughts, may or may not be worth anything - but this situation of you having issues has been going too long and it'd be good to see you with a happy result so anything at this point can't be a waste, right? :)

Thanks mate, definitely appreciate any input as I'm completely stumped. Nothing crushes motivation more than being so sure you have finally found the problem, only to go even further backwards.

Unfortunately, my tuner said the car didn't miss a beat and was really easy to tune. It behaved perfectly, didn't show any signs of anything being wrong. If I hadn't told him that it was 30hp down from its last tune and almost 100hp down from where I expected it to be then he would have thought it went really well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's not PC to say in here but you have tried pretty much everything except for changing the turbo...

Yeh, I'd be willing to give it a go if it wasn't such an expensive exercise. The whole underpowered thing seems to have always been around on mine. Even on the stock turbo, I was only making 220rwhp @14psi. Then both G2's that I used only made 295rwhp. I had put that down to the stock ECU pulling timing and fuel, but now I don't know...

30hp would be in the expected range with a different dyno though wouldnt it?

It definitely feels slower now. It feels like my previous low boost setting. Quieter too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So next year I am looking at upgrading from my VE SS bomadore ute to something more refined.  I wanted to stick with a V8 but not anything German or Australian, either a coupe or a sedan. So if I wanted anything newish that limited my options to either the Lexus RCF which I quite like. But with the price they demand and a kid on the way a 2 door coupe is probably not going to be the best idea. The next best thing would be the ISF but the newest models are 2014 and commanding over 60k and even the older 2008 models in ok condition starting around 35k is kind of bullshit. So I figured if I could not have the noise I could perhaps make do with easy power. Enter the infinity Q50 or Skyline equivalent. The price difference between the 300 and 400hp models seems a bit crazy. Right now there is 300hp Q50 one on carsales from a dealer with 61km for 27k drive away. If I wanted to get a 400hp Red or 400R car the prices seem to start at 43k From my limited research it seems that the only differences are that the 400r/Red Red runs more boost and a more aggressive tune. There are are turbine speed sensors on the turbos. Has 2 pumps for the water to air intercooler. Runs an engine oil cooler. I'm guessing that the exterior trims might look a little more sporty as well. I had a lazy look for upgrades to bridge the gap on z1motorsports They have kits that upgrade the water to air heat exchanger as well as the coolant pump which should give a non Red/400r better intercooling temps than the stock Red/400r. I added an engine oil cooler with a thermostat as well to try and make things as close as possible. Obviously the ECU is going to need a tickle. Having not done much in the way of research they also sell a ECU flashing tool with pre loaded tunes that are supposed to boost the non Red/400R by 100hp which adds 1k USD to the cost. The total cost of the parts @ the current time including shipping and taxes worked out to be $4350 AUD. Personally I would rather get the car tuned on a dyno which would probably add more cost Assuming the worst that you got a workshop to install the new parts I would guess no more than 5 hours would be required in the worst case @ 5 x $150 per hour = $750 So the total cost could be around $5100 So for easy number 5k + 27K = 32k I guess that would leave some change left over to swap out the open diff and fit a LSD Any thoughts?      
    • Right, not sure why I thought it to be a lean spike. It might be fixable with modern card-style hot film MAFs which have some design features to avoid counting reversion flow but I've never tried it myself.
    • I did not realise this, I'll contribute more and earn my stripes and retry later. 
    • I'm only going to hassle you for posting links to images. It's against my policy to click links that could be some nasty payload. Sadly, you need to make 9 more posts before you can just stick the images directly in a post, unless @PranK sees this and bends the rule for you.
    • Hello,new to the group, I bought a R32 from auction recently, wondering if anyone knows the cars history, seems to have the usual go fast bits on it, plan is to do an engine swap- add 2 extra cylinders and 1 extra turbo. https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/i4rjmlzubjbwjtguh6f4s/IMG20241011140744.jpg?rlkey=q0lumm251377vknbqktfwrycq&st=7scvwx4e&dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ro24qmwzlczzlfsr4y05x/Screenshot_2024-10-10-10-49-23-90_9a2f5bb2149dae94cd1e190effc09b33.jpg?rlkey=oyguh26ttshlf04ccp48odf4v&st=xloae97b&dl=0   New to forums and posting pics, if links don't work, take it easy on me, 42yrs old and I tune carburettors!!  
×
×
  • Create New...