Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That one is a bitch to change

Good luck

Thanks prob get some mates over so I don't have to do it all alone and to talk shit

Sorry to hear mate, Buy some gaskets and change anything suspect while your on the job :)

This will be the go if I'm changing that may as well fix the lot

G2.5 is a smaller turbo then a G3, they generally maxing out towards 260rwkws mark. So its about at its limit.

He's right, the graph shown is for a G3, but the intake leak might still be present and causing the 5ish psi boost drop. Fixing it might get him another 10-15kw from threshold to redline, definitely worth investigating.

http://www.hypergearturbos.com/atr43.html

The link says G3 but that is the graph from the G2.5 on the page. Either way I will suss out any leaks and give it another run soon.

That G2.5, I thought was a high flow. Preload the actuator about 10mms, if it starts to pin then its usually a restriction some where. This one don't have much of boost drop.

also stao,

your new website isn't meta tag searchable/ google submitted as i cant seem to find the new one on google which is meant to have more details on your range then the old website

That G2.5, I thought was a high flow. Preload the actuator about 10mms, if it starts to pin then its usually a restriction some where. This one don't have much of boost drop.

Hiflow of a stock 25 turbo? It has a 3 inch inlet so i don't think so

lol... does it fry tyres when you smash the pedal?

Yes it does, because the car is so big and front wheel drive, it wheel spins on the spot with stock tires. lol

Hiflow of a stock 25 turbo? It has a 3 inch inlet so i don't think so

Preload the actuator to about 10mms. If you a have a boost gauge, check the pressure drop before and after the cooler, also try a run with no exhaust on.

Yes it does, because the car is so big and front wheel drive, it wheel spins on the spot with stock tires. lol

Time for some M/T tyres? :P lol

This is for a good comparison of the new ATR28SS1 V ATR28G1 based on the Kia's G4GC engine:

SS1 at 8psi, G1 at 12psi:

ower:

Thin red: SS1 @ 8psi,

Green: G1 @ 12psi

Thick Red: NA none turbo @ 0psi

ss1vsg1power8psi.jpg

Boost:

Green is G1,

Yellow is SS1

g1vss1boost8psi.jpg

SS1 at 14psi, G1 at 12psi:

ellow: SS1 @ 14psi

Green: G1 @ 12psi

Red: NA @ 0psi

g1vss1power14psi.jpg

Boost:

Yellow: SS1

Green: G1

g1vss1boost14psi.jpg

This is an excellent turbo for around the 200rwkws on a SR20det.

I don't think that would be a problem. I can upgrade it to the latest profile, which is targeted at boost dropping issue with internal gate. PM if interested to go ahead.

Those are a set of CT20 Toyota Supra turbochargers that I've recently done. Those are rated to about 400HP each. Running ATR28G3 CHRAs. photos shown compressor and turbine wheel comparison, profiled compressor and turbine housings, and completed turbocharger assembly.

chra.JPG

turbine.JPG

housing.JPG

turbos.JPG

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pfft. As if I'd ever point a high pressure washer at my car.
    • The nature of my commute has changed. Way back then it was traffic lights all the way, for ~28km. It sucked. When they finally stitched the expressway together I could do a good 15+km of it at a steady 80-100 with no stopping. That alone has gotten me down to flat 10s. Prior to that it was mid-high 10s. I can't remember the delta that I saw when I got the idle down. It was only ~150 rpm, because the idle speed was never terrible, but for the delta in consumption to be noticeable it would have had to have been at least 0.2-0.3 L/100km - which is not to be sneezed at when it comes for absolute free. It's only about 50L per year, but that's ~$100. A few extra pizzas is always welcome. Note that I have a record of every tank of fuel that has ever gone through my car except for a handful put in by someone else, like my mechanic. I can show you the difference between stock RB20 and tuned RB20, stock RB5Neo and tuned, winter and summer fuel blends, winter and summer fuel blends when the ambient temperature is not appropriate for the blend, working O2 sensor, blown O2 sensor, boosting f**k out of it and frightened to boost it because it is pinging, and so on. OK, I probably can't do all that now with 100% clarity - but at the time when any of those things were in event, you could see it in the records. There's 25+ years of simple tank after tank records, so you have to look for landmarks to work out approximately how old any single record is. What's really important is the meta data and that lives in my head.
    • If you're claiming the issues are not skyline specific, then either the USA is living in the 90s / early 2000s, OR you have the issue of "survivor bias". Which is you're mainly hearing and listening to those with terrible experiences, and haven't found the guys who have cars with good decent builds and no problems. It happens in AU too, that plenty of people keep having issues, and they keep going to the workshops that are known to be shit "because I read on the internet". Even worse, are those who keep posting on the internet as though they know for a fact what something is, when they've never touched/looked at said item in their life, and again are making assumptions, based on something they read, or because it's a certain way in other cars. It's even funnier when those same people debate the facts with the people who've lived and breathed this stuff for over 15 years. Example, I've had someone tell me you can't do something with a Skyline, because they read it on the internet, except I can tell they're wrong, as I did that exact thing back in 2008 with my Skyline.
    • The funniest part I saw, was someone would bitch and moan on FB about something, Andy would be the one to respond, asking for more info, if he could contact them, what the engine setup is, what their config file was, and 95% of the responses were people just going "der! It doesn't work" and Andy going "What doesn't work?" And then going "The firmware!" And they'd go around in circles as no one could ever give information, and Haltech couldn't fault things on the bench, (especially when people wouldn't give any specifics).   Many moons ago, when Andy was back at e420c stage, he reached out to me, and asked me to test different plug and play looms for him (already had an e420c in the car on his V1 PNP loom). And he kept asking me, as I was competent enough to be able to give him some specific feedback on what was/wasn't working, how to replicate the faults etc, and work through things with him. Most people are terrible at answering the questions they're asked, or being able to provide quality feedback other than "it doesn't work".
    • I say it often, none of this stuff is really Skyline-specific per se. But in general there's not a lot of people who actually know what they're doing. A lot of people charging like they do. Agile software development probably isn't the greatest idea for an engine controller.
×
×
  • Create New...