Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

+1 for the above - He really will.

Is that new thing suitable for, I dunno, some guy wanting to run a low mount smallish turbo at 28psi on a RB28 auto sedan? ;)

LOL you sir would likely be happier with a straight SS2.

However, the new highflow profile amazes me, and a PU version of that (.82 T3 rear housing) might just rock socks on your motor!

Got some feedbacks from the ATR43SS4 built as a Ford XR6 BA internally gated bolton turbocharger. Its doing 408rwkws on 18psi P98. I think the turbine end is maxing out, it really needs a large external gate for more power.

atr45billet547hp.jpg

LOL knowing the Ford Barra thats probably revving to 6,000... Meaning its on full boost preeeeeetty close to 3,000.

Thought I might just let everyone know.. LOL

Just a heads up to anyone who wants to go bigger then SS2 and go low mount, think again :P

my SS2 JUST fits, But it does fit, Engine is in the car now, cant wait to see how it goes

20131121_161235_zpsffbd6781.jpg

20131121_161244_zpsc9df5de5.jpg

It's not far off from what I can tell. We did some trial fitting and working out exhaust/wastegate configuration on the old engine.

Its probably slightly different but not a whole lot off. But I'd say the stock side mount manifold wouldnt be quite as tight

I cant remember what Stao's Brae manifold is off the top of my head?

Just a heads up to anyone who wants to go bigger then SS2 and go low mount, think again :P

my SS2 JUST fits, But it does fit, Engine is in the car now, cant wait to see how it goes

...

Nice. Does that manifold mount turbo in exactly stock location?

It's not far off from what I can tell. We did some trial fitting and working out exhaust/wastegate configuration on the old engine.

Its probably slightly different but not a whole lot off. But I'd say the stock side mount manifold wouldnt be quite as tight

I cant remember what Stao's Brae manifold is off the top of my head?

It's pretty much the same deal with the stock manifold, my SS2 fits but only just (on an R34). The actuator to chassis clearance is 1 or 2 mm so it's tight. Also due to the overall length of the turbo the intake and OEM intercooler piping will need some customisation. For a direct bolt-on a highflow is the easier option.

Just a heads up to anyone who wants to go bigger then SS2 and go low mount, think again :P

my SS2 JUST fits, But it does fit, Engine is in the car now, cant wait to see how it goes

Wow! Looks pretty cool, but pretty intense - I always kindof liked the idea of a low mount setup but after seeing a couple I'd say it'd be a pain if you had to change turbos haha. Out of interest, depending on what brand you go you can get a MASSIVE amount of power out of that size frame - even the 900hp FP3794HTA turbo uses the same housings as you have there, so I am sure inside and outside of the HG range there is plenty to move up to if you end up needing more power than the SS2 can give you.

Be good to see results :)

Im trying to keep it as legal and non sus as possible while still chasing decent power.

I know the 6boost hardly looks stock but at least theres not a turbo hanging up top lol. Power steering line is fouling on the joiner off the comp housing. Can kinda see it in the first photo. Thats about the only issue

Got some feedbacks from the ATR43SS4 built as a Ford XR6 BA internally gated bolton turbocharger. Its doing 408rwkws on 18psi P98. I think the turbine end is maxing out, it really needs a large external gate for more power.

atr45billet547hp.jpg

Stao..how about you make one with a Gt37 style turbine. like i said in my messages

a while back ...the rb30 boys would be able to use that aswell...Ill even test it on a mid 10 sec car..lol

cheers

darren

Haha, i missed the end.

ATR43G2.5

Keen to see how it goes I have g2.5 and currently underwhelmed with my result and unsure if it's turbo or something else that is lacking.

What was your result and why are you underwhelmed?

250rwkw. Hits hard about 3500/4000 which is good but after that the power just flattens out has no extra go at all pretty much gets the 250kw at 4500 and doesn't climb from there

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi again all, I’ve tried doing some searching on the topic but couldn’t find the answer I’m looking for.   I deleted my clutch booster because it had an air leak and was squealing like a hog, and now my clutch has very poor pedal feel and the friction zone is way too small, so I believe I need a bigger diameter clutch master cylinder to compensate for not using the booster. I found a Wilwood option that’s 3/4” for a good price and will fit my 3AN clutch line, but all the firewall adapters I see online such as RB factory or Chase Bays are listed as RWD only (GTST/GTS). Link below. https://rbfactory.shop/products/nissan-to-wilwood-girling-clutch-master-cylinder-adapter My question is if these adapters will also fit a GTR, and if anyone has experience using a 3/4” CMC without the booster, my clutch is a Nismo coppermix twin plate.   Thanks, always appreciate the advice!
    • Catching up on a post, I've replaced the external shark fin with a small 4g antenna (no further drilling, just a 1mm embiggening of the existing hole, and run that to where the dual battery models have the battery in the left rear guard.  No idea what the factory antenna did, but removing it had no impact on anything I use, according to the US manual the GPS antenna is in the dash and it still works fine Also ended up stealing battery power from one of the amps and ACC power from a unit nearby to add an ACC relay to power it. The mounted the booster, wifi, power socket and antenna splitter in the rear left guard out of the way, all out of site with the boot trims in
    • What drama? The only drama you're going to have is the near constant work to maintain all those sphericals. I only have sphericals in my front caster rods and front upper CAs (because both of these are near compulsory in an R32). I have had the front arms out of my car 34 times already this month, and if the new replacements arrive today, I will have them out and apart again tomorrow. Chasing clicking and clunking that comes from sphericals being a.....poor choice for a road car. Moisture and dirt are not their friends. I have been contemplating a change to my rear subframe that would require me to use sphericals in my lower CAs. And.....I don't want to have them that close to the road.
    • Did you need anything else you've already done? If you had it before... and liked the changes after, then supposedly it'd be more of the same. The idea about most suspension arms is to tune geometry that the OEM arms max out at/can't handle because they weren't designed to have the car setup in such a way that 'looks good'.
    • I have replaced everything on my r34 including suspension to Miester R, all rear subframe bushes to poly, all arms to metal adjustable and same in front.   only thing I haven't touched is the front lower control arm. Should I? what improvement can i expect ? I mean the one on the link below?   Car drives perfectly, it is just me thinking everything is either puly bush or hard bearing type so should also do lower control arm front but do I really need it ? https://www.japspeed.co.uk/product/suspension/adjustable-arms/nissan-200sx-s13-s14-s15-skyline-r32-r33-r34-adjustable-suspension-front-lower-control-arms/?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiAo5u6BhDJARIsAAVoDWs5V_PauQPf0kx3zFCaA4tOC9Q7JSIsfJWma_jAPN2f1sJA686djOwaAidgEALw_wcB
×
×
  • Create New...