Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Being the go to backyard performance mechanic of all my friends and their friends, friends, friends, brothers, cousins, friend, I do a lot of those ling long JJR dumps, and I haven't had an issue.

You guys must be faaaaarking unlucky to get shit ones. No kidding.

^ the newer batches appear to be garbage, I bought a ling long JJR dump back in 2007 and it fit like a glove, no bashing no grinding no swearing. These days, they appear to have dropped the ball a little and it's absolute garbage. I've bought & fitted two for mates and both times both need some bashing & grinding to line up the bolt holes.

Anyways, back on track...2x things, what size is the top fitting for the oil feed? The Kando factory RB25DET kit oil feed is heaps bigger than this:

DSC_1213.jpg

Also one for Stao & everyone else... is there any reason for the rear is so long? I believe there's no need for it and it just ends up causing issues with fitment.

DSC_1212.jpg

Also one for Stao & everyone else... is there any reason for the rear is so long? I believe there's no need for it and it just ends up causing issues with fitment.

\

Theres no reason for it to be any length, should of just got it with the flange and then constructed the rest to suit your setup.

Mainly its out of the same jig as mine and it worked ok on my car. Can be modified with no problems.

Water is in m18x1.5

Oil is in m10x1.25

Do NOT use oil restrictor on the normal versions of the ss turbos.

Merry xmas every one.

  • Like 1

Hi Stao, what boost controller would you recommend for ATR43-SS2 internally gated with the 20psi actuator? I'd like to get the boost up to a steady 20psi.

I am currently running a TurboTech V2 MBC and when the car was tuned (257rwkw @ ~17psi) my tuner commented that they had some trouble tuning with it, something to do with the adjustment. They suggested a simple TurboSmart boost tee instead if I wanted to keep with a manual boost controller. However, I'm wondering if I should go electronic instead - are there affordable yet good ones out ther?

Thanks

Pre-load the actuator rod first and see if that makes any changes before switching boost controllers. I'm currently using a Prefect B EBC and seems to be fine at current stage.

As fyi I have used a turbotech v1 on my SS1PU and was able to hold 20psi easy. I now use a hybrid ebc to great success, just the simple single stage version and it's great.

Pre-load the actuator rod first and see if that makes any changes before switching boost controllers. I'm currently using a Prefect B EBC and seems to be fine at current stage.

From memory the pre-load was set before installation but will double check. Thanks Stao.

As fyi I have used a turbotech v1 on my SS1PU and was able to hold 20psi easy. I now use a hybrid ebc to great success, just the simple single stage version and it's great.

Cool thanks. I wonder if my V2 is just a temperamental unit ... I'm tempted to swap it over to a V1 or a Turbosmart boost tee, or even a simple EBC like the Gizzmo one. However I will check the pre-load setting first.

No it's not a real t3 gt3071r with the full size 60mm turbine wheel will crack 300rwkw on a sr

On nissansilvia there's a guy making

347rwkw on a gtx3071r twinscroll on just under 30psi e85 20psi by 3600rpm on VCt sr

Another

Make and model: s15 sr20det unopened engine in s13

Size of engine: 2.0L

Modifications to the car: supporting mods nismo 740's, z32 afm, greddy valve springs, copy sump, jjr exhaust manifold modded to suit 44mm tial, 3 inch exhaust, trust 400x300x100 tube and fin intercooler, 40mm china radiator, trust oil cooler, splitfires, old blitz dsbc, bosch 044 and surge tank, s15 pfc.

Type of turbo: 3071

Trim of turbo: 56T 71mm compressor .5ar housing, 84T 60mm GT30 turbine .63 housing

Rear Exhaust housing: .63 non gated

When does vehicle begin boost: dunno

When does vehicle reach full boost and what PSI: 20psi@3600

Does the vehicle have Cams? if so; yep

What brand: Unigroup spec camtechs,

What lift/duration etc: 255 11.5 in 260 12.0 ex

Max power achieve at what boost: 285rwkw@21psi on ultimate

I believe what he meant is the 28ss1 turbo made same power as a real gt3071 with 100 RPMs better response. So fitting it to above SR would result same power with better response.

Yeah I know but his setup ain't performing 100% though <br />Even the full gt3071r result on his car is abit low on power and abit laggy <br />Which I suspect to be to do with his VCt disabled and cam timing not dialked in correct

I reckon it's in the cam timing as my car does fine without the VCT, tbh I wouldn't change it. The delivery is aggressive and the motor breathes very well down low. BUT I don't think stao will want that, I believe he will want the VCT working to demonstrate the best response possible from his product. So I agree with by_rpm in that he needs to fix his VCT and dial the cams to correct position before proceeding.

V28 I reckon it's something in your setup as the v2 should work great. Look at your vacuum line setup and your preload. If in Sydney and need a trained eye at a low price drop me a PM.

The T2 3071 just isn't a great turbo. I remember having a quick chat to Jez about it when I saw one at his place. He said tuning that vs my t3 turbo was completely different. Mine loves timing, but the smaller version was hating it. I think the most Jez got out of the t2 was 260ish from memory.

Yeah but he said he had the full gt3071r turbine ended 60mm but fitted with a t2 housing they usually come t3 and the cropped t2 gt3071r only has a 56.5mm turbine

Look at this

http://www.hardtuned.net/forums/index.phpshowtopic=520672&view=&hl=&fromsearch=1

Low mounted std manifold t2 gtx3071r but ext gate

So it's definately not the t2 housing holding it back 320rwkw

Edited by hy_rpm

GTX3071 is different, that is equivalent to a 3076 turbo. Which will make more power.

Here is some photo of the 3071 that came out of mine:

front.jpg

rear.jpg

^^

Definitely the proper GT3071.

I've done few extra drawings for a couple of different compressor and turbine wheels. Will be getting them made after the new year holidays.

Yeah definately looks to have a larger turbine as it comes very close to the int gate <br />I know the gtx3071r has a larger compressor just saying that it wasn't the turbine side of it holding the power back or t2 housing and they still share the same turbine still but

Cool thanks. I wonder if my V2 is just a temperamental unit ... I'm tempted to swap it over to a V1 or a Turbosmart boost tee, or even a simple EBC like the Gizzmo one. However I will check the pre-load setting first.

As FYI: I fitted another HDi SBC-R like mine last night, to an S15. Result was flawless. Wen't from 7psi creeping to 11psi (no boost control prior) to now holding 15psi from threshold to redline.

Once again I am happy with this ebc.

  • 2 weeks later...

New turbo is in my future I think so I've got a few Q's...

I'm aiming for around the 260-270rwkw mark but want the install to be as seamless and look as factory as possible.

1. Should I get a high-flow of my factory turbo or SS1PU? I want response but while maximizing top-end power without losing efficiency in higher revs. Only thing I have to compare to is my mates R34 which was running 260rwkw with a 2871. I liked the power delivery of that turbo. Which high-flow service? Standard? 'Wild'? etc?

2. From what I've read the SS1PU uses a thicker exhaust flange which causes fitment issues between dump pipe and A/C or firewall?

3. Are aftermarket intake pipes needed for any of the above? Would prefer to stick with the stock rubber hoses.

4. Are actuators supplied with any of the above or do I have to source my own/use factory item?

Any other turbo suggestions are welcome too..

I can read dyno charts all day but would prefer some qualitative feedback in layman's terms.

Cheers!

Edited by colourclassic

^^

Standard high flow will be fine.

Another some thing interesting to look at is my modified exhaust manifold with external gate. Yes did run into few issues with the actual gate running into the fire wall which is all yet sorted.:

incarfront.jpg

incarside.jpg

Positioned the gate away from things could be burnt as possible. We should be able to compare results based on using both internal and external gates.

Plus I remembered that about year and half ago I've done few dyno runs with exhaust housing mounted external gates, which we can use results from to calculate a percentage difference between manifold and turbine housing mounted external gate setups.

^^^

Trailed the new OP6 R34 high flow profile today.

With factory manifold + external gate assembly above, it maxed at 376rwkws on 24psi. That is very decent amount of power considering a $850 high flow service, $350 gate and couple of hours of marking around. I guess no real need of a high mount kit any more.

I've also done a back to back test of having the same turbocharger running on both internal and external. Above external gate setup have made an extra 21rwkws with more torque based on the same boost.

Uploading videos now, Will post up results when I get a working scanner tomorrow.

And Happy new year every one. :merli:

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • All of that is absolutely true. At any time in the history of these turbos the lottery has always been that it could die at stock boost treated exactly as the factory intended, or it could die when pushed to 10, or 12, or 14, or 16 psi, after a short time, or a longer time, or it could last seemingly forever. You have the combination of all the possible statistical (probably) normal distributions of manufacturing tolerances and quality outcomes, on top of the statistical distributions of failure modes (which might be normal, but are probably biased, like Poisson distributions). You get the lucky turbo and you can beat on it for years. You get the really unlucky turbo and it will crap itself as it rolls out of the factory gate. And every possibility in between. But you can definitely still kill the lucky turbo. It's just that most people didn't try, once they knew they really shouldn't try.
    • Maybe I have Stockholm syndrome but working on an M2 isn't that hard. Getting parts cheaply and quickly is hard, but getting parts same day isn't necessarily hard if you're willing to pay way too much for it at local dealers. There's a lot going on, you need to have a build of ISTA on a laptop and the right cable, if you don't have the mindset of "do it exactly right or not at all" you will probably start seeing cascading failures. Skylines are a little more tolerant in that regard. The car doesn't potentially trash itself if you bought the wrong oil filter like a BMW would. Or trash the entire cylinder head and potentially spin a bearing because someone took the anti-drainback valve out of the plastic oil filter cap. An M2 will also do just fine on track, zero oil starvation concerns, factory brakes are great if you change the pads for a high temp compound + flush with track-ready fluid.
    • The "ideal/formula" that used to be touted was death of the turbo is going to be caused by a combination of 3 things. Heat Speed of turbo (boost level you're pushing) Time   Basically, you can get away with high heat and high boost for short periods. But start doing long hard pulls, or circuit driving etc, and now you've increased time as well which will shred things. From memory when Adrian was drag racing he was running 17psi, on a stock turbo, and running insane speeds. But he also had other additives helping in the setup too. Some people have success at 14psi for a while, while others due to pushing the cars hard for long periods opt down to lower temps. But also, generate a lot of heat (let's say bad tune), for a long time, and you'll be okay, until you try to spin that little guy up slightly. It's the one advantage of dumping a lot of fuel in, you'll be reducing EGT a bit and helping with the heat portion of the above 3 areas.   And these days, stock turbos are that old that there's the possibility of just outright failures due to material age. I'm not shocked that even when used in factory spec that a stock turbo fails when 30 years old. It's a worn out "precision" "balanced" performance item, that's likely no longer precise, or well balanced
    • this... hence I said what I said previously, SMSP nights you see mainly Hondas, Evos, A90s, F80x and the odd VW. The 5 or 6 times I went, I only saw 1x R32 GT-R, and other than that I was the only one in a shit box Skyline.
    • Yeah, but it's not "boost" that they can take more of. Well, I guess it actually is. They are the same turbine, driving different compressors. I think the failure is more of a turbine temperature and (probably mostly) speed thing. I think the RB25s end up needing the turbine to reach higher speeds in order to drive the compressor to achieve the same boost level. So they will fail at lower boost on a 25 because they've actually reached the same failure speed that they do on a 20 at a higher boost pressure. If that makes sense?
×
×
  • Create New...