Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

sr can be very different depending on cams. On this particular car yes. But either way they all made more power and way better response then the td05H 18g copy that was originally on there.

Car was tuned on a roller dyno with proper configurations.

it still runs off stock 2.5inches induction. I have a feeling it might be restrictive.

While we are on Sr results, I can't remember if I shared this in here or not.

Rps13

S14 motor, with VCT active. Gtx3071 0.82, 6boost, 44mm tial, un1cams.

Boosts are 16/18psi Stock motor, incl head gasket, and it's on p98.

post-76224-13982972611519_thumb.jpg

^ Nice, GTScoTT may sex wee! Would be a little meaningful with rpm though, silly rolling road dynos :(

Will see how the atr28ss2 does on my brothers s13 on pump 98
If that goes well I might be intrested in upgrading

I'm curious - I notice the 18G and your current turbo made almost exactly the power, and you mentioned previously you had full boost by 4000rpm with the 18G.... how does the .86 compare with the 18G in terms of response?

^ Nice, GTScoTT may sex wee! Would be a little meaningful with rpm though, silly rolling road dynos :(

I'm curious - I notice the 18G and your current turbo made almost exactly the power, and you mentioned previously you had full boost by 4000rpm with the 18G.... how does the .86 compare with the 18G in terms of response?

Yup, Scott and I have been chatting away about setups... :)

We only revved it to about 7300rpm if that helps.

It's not too laggy, but it does catch me out now and then on the track getting out of corners. It's mainly a track car.

It's feels as with the 18g it was a big surge of power after 4000rpm

And not much before than

Where as with the ss1.5 it just comes in more linear and smoother power delivery from 3000rpm up but there is no big surge of power

The way the power comes on with the ss1.5 it will be easier to put down but the 18g snaps you back in the seat more once on power

That'll probably be partly just the boost curve of the 18G going up higher in the midrange as much as anything, though the big a/r you have now probably also plays into it a bit. Would have been interesting to have seen how the 16G6 would have gone, we're making similar power to you with one but it's also in the TD06 sized housing - have suspected for a long time (as Stao referred to with his turbo too) the T28 bolton housing and associated bits are probably a bit of a restriction at this level.

Another update this is my latest ATR43SS2 turbocharger.Compare to the current one. Compressor inducer has been increased by 2mms, while the turbine inducer and exducer has been increased by 3mms. This particular one is expected to be maxed out at around 390rwkws on E85.

comp.JPG

Hey Stao, Whats the advantages of the new SS2 ball bearing version over the older journal bearing one? I bought mine mid last year and it is going onto my RB2530 so wondering if its worth getting you to upgrade it while its off.

The newer version has a larger 63mm turbine and a larger compressor inducer. It will make more power.

With the ball bearing part, well it does not make a real lot of differences. Just prettier to look at when I flick it with my fingers.

I though (have done no research) that a ball bearing turbo would be more responsive than a journal turbo. Especially transient response.

Guess I won't worry about it then :)

I was talking to lithium

But the the 2.5 inch comp housing can't be too restrictive as the 180sx before me on the dyno had the 2.5inch bolt on comp housing with the hks2540 and the pulled 280 odd kW and backed it off to 274kw on just 22psi cause the injectors were maxxed and same as a s15 with a greddy t518z made 281kw

The atr28ss2 should make Simlar power to the gtx3071r on pump 98 but with less lag

The same lag I got now with the ss1.5 but 280 odd kw on pump 98

Well, i can run a 2.5inches pipe to it and find out i guess.

Either way. Assume if you had enough fuel and has larger size cams, the ss15 should set around the 280rwkws mark on your car.

Building one more prototype working with the .64 rear.

This thread is already hard enough to follow, but now with the sr20 results in thr mix it's super hard.

Perhaps there should be a separate sr20 results thread.

  • Like 1

Yeah tuner did say there was proberly 5-10kw in it if I replaced the fuel pump to a walbro 460lph

But I can't justify spending $500 plus for the retune and fuel pump to gain 5-10kw

if I was to get a retune I want to gain atleast 20-30kw

But I need to upgrade injectors and fuel pump and turbo if I was to stay e85

But if I stayed with p100 100octane fuel I might get away with just a larger pump and the turbo upgrade which will proberly be my next stage in a few months

The 2.5 inches skyline induction pipe in comparison to a proper 3 inch metal induction pipe was huge in difference. The S14.5 that I currently have also has a 4 inch metal induction pipe.

I have seen some 2.5 to 3 inch expander pipe. Those might comes handy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What could be causing my clutch problem besides a bad master or slave then? Both those parts are new 
    • Just came across this, but in QLD I start leave again in 2 weeks, if it is still available I might drive up and check it out Unless, @MBS206 do you live near here????, if so I could hit you up with a finders fee https://www.gumtree.com.au/s-ad/hope-island/auto-body-parts/nc-mx5-factory-hard-top/1328976391
    • My hold point for future mods is that I want a OEM detachable hard top first, but, finding one is a pain, MX5 Mania are looking for one for me, but, as hens teeth are more common, finding one in Australia is proving problematic  I can get a OEM one from overseas, hell, you can still get new ones in 'Merica, but, shipping is a absolute killer and I cannot justify the cost, or the risk of it being damaged during transport As for the aftermarket hardtops, whilst they do the job of being a hard top, and are fine for a track car, they don't seal well (read: leak like a sieve in the rain), and you need a plastic/poly rear window, plus they are a bolt in option only and not made to be easily removed I liked how the hard top on my NB could be fitted, and removed, by myself, in less than 5 minutes I know it sounds bad, but I'm waiting for someone to write off a car with one so I can swoop in on their pain, it will go to a good home though, so my guilt of this is tempered
    • I’ve got one on mine and it’s fine, 
    • No, you don't want to plug the vacuum line, as that will turn that side of the booster into an air spring and probably make it feel worse. I'm not saying that the GTR master itself doesn't need a booster. I haven't paid attention to the GTR one to know what size it is cf the non-GTR ones. But when you think about it - they have to do the same job, which is to move a little slave piston a few mm to do what it is supposed to do, and that final action is the same on all the cars. So, it is very unlikely that the GTR MC is any different than the others, because it has the same pedal stroke and the same output requirement. The booster just makes it feel easier. I'd suggest you probably have an actual hydraulic problem. It's totally common on these old shitboxes.
×
×
  • Create New...