Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think to sell to vl owners, you really need to sell it with a standard R33/r34 comp housing so it looks standard nissan , as i can tell you thats

what vl owners want as a hi-flow.....especially in states with the EPA.

Have you checked the actuator clearance to chassis rail yet?

As soon as you use a .70 T04s comp cover you might as well go straight to a 3540/G4 .82 turbo as even they spool from the

basement on a sohc rb30 with a auto and 2800/3000 converter

those two setups there are the standard vl thing.

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

This VLT had a the .60 based GT3076 machined in .63 stock housing with a spacer. The turbo exploded of course, and his rear housing was cracked all over. I ended up building a jig for his rear housing + dump pipe and made every thing new in the exact same position. Be interested to see what it makes after, will update once result sent in.

Trent just tuned a XR6 FG with our ATR45 turbo. Car made 400rwkws+ on 20psi E85, and 384rwkws on P98 fuel. Internally gated bolton.

6806_749033445140589_1883089160005563732

1919633_749033395140594_7335455583209472

I'm not 100% certain but that doesn't look like a 0.70 AR T04S compressor housing to me , the back plate doesn't look big enough in diameter and all the T04S back plates I've seen from Garrett were cast iron not aluminium for bush bearing cores - and the larger BB T4Rs ie P/60-1 and T04Z .

I suspect it is the relatively unknown 0.70 AR version of the T04B family which uses the standard T04B back plate .

The 0.70 AR B housing being a larger ratio would flow a bit more than the 0.60 AR version and not be as bulky as T04E or T04S compressor housings .

A .

Yes most of the the stuff are quite custom. The housing were made in castings, its then been machined to suit a range of wheels, back plates and bearing housings.The cold side doesn't affect performance as much as the hot side would. That G3 is using an an generic .70 casting, performance in between this, .50 and .60 T4 as well as T2x .60 are very similar with this particular wheel.

And Just bought a virgin 98 model GTR of a old guy. I will be doing a bit of RB26 turbo developments in the next few month. It is currently full stock, and very slow. I think my KIA is quicker at this stage :D

And any one is interested to buy my KIA and S14? I need some garage space. Thanks

Its been a good six month in to building and evaluating turbochargers for SR20det motors and I'm coming back to do further work on Rb engines. Except this time it is for Rb26DETT. I have purchased a fully stock 98 model GTR33 with 55,000KM from a 65 years old man as my new test rig. As for this evaluation I would prefer some thing some thing easy bolt on that produces reasonably good power and response, I will also look into possibilities of a single turbo that might fit factory twin exhaust manifolds.

Since the car is fully standard with a cat back exhaust only, I will be posting information on the parts that I might be getting for the modifications that I do, and effects of it in terms of power, response and drive ability. Hopefully my GTR venture will be smooth and successful.

gtrfront900.jpg

Stock standard engine bay:
enginebay900.jpg


Some interesting found. Its funny how the GTR has a twin entry air box, with one end capped off:
airpoxcap900.jpg

From the past few days of driving. Also been call a skyline, the drive ability is totally different to the GTST. It just doesn't feels to be the same car, and definitely fast for OEM spec.

I will be installing an Adaptronic Eselect ECU with larger aftermarket front pipes before initial dyno tune for some base results.

I have spent a reasonable amount of time reading up few member's GTR build ups. But please share experiences and post useful advises if you are experienced in modifying GTRs. Thank you.

  • Like 1

Twin atr28ss2 will be easy 400-450kw or more

My brother road tuned his s13 with s15 VCt motor a few weeks ago with the atr28ss2

Dyno day yesterday at Unigroup so decided to see what it made

226kw @20psi by 3600rpm only Reving to 5000rpm as he had pinging issues so they didn't rev past 5000rpm looks promising response is very good but he decided to just switch over to e85 jungle juice as it will need a retune and to sort out the issue

Should be done it 2-3weeks but I'll get the current dyno sheet up tomorrow

Garretts base line is the R34 BB ceramic turbos and their first aftermarket one (GT2859R) uses a smaller 62T version of the usual 76T NS111 turbine . They also had smallish turbine housings similar to OE .

Not for the budget minded but BB centres seem to be the go in GTR turbos and I wouldn't go any other way given the effort to R&R RB26 twin turbos .

Obviously there is scope to improve on the cast compressors GTRs turbos have and any aero smarts with less inertia will help .

I wouldn't expect miracles with these cars given their 2568ccs and around 1500 Kgs to shift . GTRs would have to be the hardest of all Skylines to get good all round performance out of because they are the heaviest and have SFA more capacity and less than the usual valve train smarts to help out .

Probably the most important things standard ones have is small light internals turbos in reasonably small housings .

It's no great secret that a turbo engine relying on smallish turbo/s doesn't take very well to larger ones because the std ones were making a not real high tech low CR engine usable at round town speeds and revs .

Minimum friction and lightest internals is the way ahead in GTR turbos IMO .

A .

bravo sir.

i find my single spins up at 2k and hits full boost by 4. no idea what the timing are on a standard gtr. but i presume its around the same.

i personally dont want more power, but would love better response, and mid range.

but like i said. i dont hava gtr, just a gtr turbo. on a 1275 engine with 4 cylinders. :woot:

Little bit lolz. A ATR43G3 turbocharger I've built while ago ended up on an stock Rb20det. Then made 296rwkws at about 22psi of boost on pump 98 fuel. Never thought they could be making so much power in stock form

rb20deg297rwkw.jpg

car.jpg

Updated result from yesterday: 275 rwkw @ 20psi and 285 without air box lid and filter. R34 with SS2 on 98.

Changes since last run are a better actuator arm (thanks heaps Stao!!) and a Venom 5" 100cpsi cat. Very happy with it now.

Will post the dyno sheet when I'm back on the computer.

Updated result from yesterday: 275 rwkw @ 20psi and 285 without air box lid and filter. R34 with SS2 on 98.

Changes since last run are a better actuator arm (thanks heaps Stao!!) and a Venom 5" 100cpsi cat. Very happy with it now.

Will post the dyno sheet when I'm back on the computer.

How much power did an air filter cost?

Surely you will use a filter?

How much power did an air filter cost?

Surely you will use a filter?

Air box lid and filter cost 10 rwkw when comparing otherwise identical runs back to back.

And yes I'm running the full stock airbox, snorkel and a K&N panel filter on the street.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
×
×
  • Create New...