Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ATR43 SS-2 Rb25det Stagea. Externally gated from stock exhaust manifold E85 fuel. Final result of 356rwkws @ 22psi on Dyna dynamic dyno:

boost.jpg

coolercompare.jpg


Further testing and evaluation on the SS2.5 Alpha turbocharger, now using an 600x300x68mm tube n fine front mount cooler. I've attached two photos, note the tubing size inside the aftermarket cooler and factory cooler.



Aftermarket cooler:


insidenewcooler.jpg



Stock cooler:


insidestockcooler.jpg



Using the new intercooler, boost tapering issue was resolved to some extend and the same turbocharger managed to pickup more power. Cooling ability however is not as good as standard, under comparison my intake temp rise by 10 degrees. I will be fitting an thicker 600x300x100mm cooler for further evaluations coming week.


Turbocharger wise, it is matching factory N1's responds but a lot more power. Pretty good to drive at this stage.



ATR43SS2.5 Alpha, externally gated on pump 98 fuel. Peek 330awkws:


atr43ss25alpha330rwkw.jpg




atr43ss25alphaboost.jpg



Vs stock cooler using the same turbo:


coolervs.jpg



In conclusion based on test result, the factory GTR intercooler is only good for up to 320rwkws on pump fuel, for upgrade, I would be recommending a good cooler that has a core size of 600x300x100mm.



Tuned by Trent Hewitson, Intercooler piping and related fabrication done by Havoc Fabrications.


  • Like 1

All three GTR coolers are different, the 33 is best for cooling efficiency but worst for outright flow

My 105mm ARC cooler ( the best in the business) is about 4-6deg hotter then the factory 34 cooler but will happierly flow 1000hp

As I mentioned to Tao yesterday, Daz has made 500kw on a stock cooler and is heading for more. Not sure yet if he plans to upgrade his cooler this time around.

As I mentioned to Tao yesterday, Daz has made 500kw on a stock cooler and is heading for more. Not sure yet if he plans to upgrade his cooler this time around.

Yeah Ive heard of 450kw before

As I mentioned to Tao yesterday, Daz has made 500kw on a stock cooler and is heading for more. Not sure yet if he plans to upgrade his cooler this time around.

It isn't stock, it's 90 mm thick.

All three GTR coolers are different, the 33 is best for cooling efficiency but worst for outright flow

Weird that they're all different. How does the 32 cooler go?

And for people whom are switching to the ID 1000 injectors. The resister pack made for OEM injectors has to be removed. Big thanks for M35scotty on solving this issue yesterday. I believe he has some technical details to share.

Weird that they're all different. How does the 32 cooler go?

The 32 is the best for flow but worst for efficiency, it is extrude honed and doesn't have the little fine fins inside the runners

You can tell the difference between 32 and 33 by the front of the runners, the 33 has a grove that runs along the runner which the 32 doesn't

And for people whom are switching to the ID 1000 injectors. The resister pack made for OEM injectors has to be removed. Big thanks for M35scotty on solving this issue yesterday. I believe he has some technical details to share.

That is something very simple and well known, simple cut the resistor off and solder the seven wires together then a bit of heat shrink and electrical tape and bingo high imp injectors working

  • Like 1

One of his injectors had stopped working, after testing it I realised he hadn't cut the resistor pack off, one resistor had blown taking the power from that injector.

The resistor pack was much hotter than usual. Obviously it runs fine on the Haltech without modification, but overloads the resistors. Goes to show the Haltech runs some great output drivers.

Um, aren't the injectors on a GTR a negative trigger, so all the ecu has to do is earth them

That's the reason you remove the resistor, cause it's no longer needed and the high imp injectors will fry it

The 32 is the best for flow but worst for efficiency, it is extrude honed and doesn't have the little fine fins inside the runners

You can tell the difference between 32 and 33 by the front of the runners, the 33 has a grove that runs along the runner which the 32 doesn't

Sweet it should be better for e85 to a certain extent then as it doesn't need the efficiency that it would for 98

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
    • I'm almost at a point where I feel like changing the alternator. Need to check the stuff you mentioned first though.
×
×
  • Create New...