Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hopefully this time the highflow lives up to it's expectations as I don't really want to pay more money to be disapointed again. Stao I will send you an email so this can be arranged in the new year :)

I can guarantee you won't be disappointed. Can't be bothered scrolling back to find out, but please make sure you have a tuneable ECU also.

  • Like 1

For 260rwkws, sell your OP6 and buy and send in a blown R33 turbo. Once that is high flowed, it will be making around 260rwkws with factory responds.

Got the GTR pulling 404akws today using a high flowed blown kando T67 (from Peter). And did back to back test with few different coolers, will upload results shortly.

  • Like 1

Wouldn't the r34 turbo be better for highflowing or does the lager rear create a lot of lag? My car has the below mods so the only piece to the puzzle missing is the turbo.

Apexi Pod
Nistune
Npc Heavy Duty Organic Clutch
Apexi AVCR boost controller
Full 3.5inch zorst
Nismo Fuel Pump
Z32 AFM
Siemens 550cc injectors
Yellow Jacket Coil Packs
HDI Front Mount

So as you can see my car is capable of making some decent power just need the right turbo to do so.

Edited by DoseVader

Wouldn't the r34 turbo be better for highflowing or does the lager rear create a lot of lag? My car has the below mods so the only piece to the puzzle missing is the turbo.

it is wonderful that you came to this realisation yourself.

incidentally plenty of info from a search.

you are in fact all set for a sweet setup after highflowing your R34 'OP6' turbo

enjoy

it is wonderful that you came to this realisation yourself.

incidentally plenty of info from a search.

you are in fact all set for a sweet setup after highflowing your R34 'OP6' turbo

enjoy

Can't be any more laggy then my current highflow setup, full boost at 5,000rpm thats living barry

Then you'd find the r34 hypergear highflow a blessing

I still need to sort my Pfc boost control setting out properly to get the boost right in the upper mid range, but it pulls nicely from 3500 rpm onwards, got 276 rwkw, power delivery is very linear and easy to drive

Good part about the highflow is it essentially bolts on, so installation is easier if you're doing it yourself.

Anyone feel free to correct me if I'm wrong but I thought the ss1PU is designed to be able to pull the same max power as the OP6 highflow with even better response?

Yes SS1PU is made to do the same sort of power as the OP6 high flow but with stock alike response, thats a very good option as well.

As mentioned earlier I've upgraded the intercooler on the R33 GTR from 600x300x68mm to 600x300x100mm. Using the same ATR43SS25 Alpha turbocharger, it managed to hold more boost on less boost controller duty, 10 degrees less in air temp, picked up more mid to top range, and the penalty in response is 100RPM.

By now, I have a good platform for turbocharger related evaluation and testing.

atr43ss25alpha337rwkw.jpg

atr43ss25alphaboost.jpg

Also for few customers reports boost tappering issues on their RBs. Check your pressure drop across your intercooler. Some of you might be surprised of how much boost it actually restricts.

Below is a dyno log on a ATR45 using a return flow cooler, with customer defending for his 20 Cents junk.

Green is before cooler, and Red/pink is after cooler.

coolerrestriction.jpg

I found this issue with people using Blitz front mount and return flows also. If this is a scenario on your setup, get a tube n fin, 600x300x100mm cooler, we can supply that for under $200, and that has been tested and works.

+1, get the high flow - meets all your requirements and lighter on the pocket. I got the SS2 because I wanted a dyno queen LOL

Tell the truth Johnny you just wanted GAAAAAAAATTTEEEE! :D

Intercooler restriction. that car made identical amount of power using OP6 high flow, SS2 and now a G4 (3582 equivalent). They all can only be boosted to 16psi with actuator disconnected. Similar behavior to when I was using stock GTR33 cooler, this one is alot worse.

This is result from the Peter's dead T67 earlier, It is now rebuilt and high flowed running our ATR43G4 CHRA assembly, pulled 404awkws E85, fuel pump leaned out. Its now tested and ready for pickup. This assembly is good enough to pull around 430awkws with a new pump. I don't think I will be chasing for more power at this stage, But will be working to get better response.

compcoverin.jpg

turbine.jpg

compressor.jpg

turborear.jpg

atr43g4power.jpg

atr4g4boost.jpg

Video added:

Told ya so Mark lol ;)

Hehe, that you did Mick. Been plenty of decent results with Blitz coolers before though (at around 250-260rwkW Mark), which was why I was wondering if the pressure drop is more noticeable at higher boost.

Anyways, thanks for posting those results Stao.

ATR43SS2.5 Alpha final run on E85, GTR-R33. made 367awkws on 20psi.

atr43ss25alpha367rwkwe85.jpg

I've included dyno videos of the same turbocharger running both P98 and E85 fuel:

Tell the truth Johnny you just wanted GAAAAAAAATTTEEEE! :D

Fine, I'm not going to lie. I wanted gate LOL

Fek all those Honda homo vtecs, I has gate... Don't be mad :D

Hehe, that you did Mick. Been plenty of decent results with Blitz coolers before though (at around 250-260rwkW Mark), which was why I was wondering if the pressure drop is more noticeable at higher boost.

Anyways, thanks for posting those results Stao.

Exactly what I thought when I bought my blitz return flow, time for a new cooler it seems..

What cooler was it Tao?

Edited by owen1r

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...