Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Stao, would it be possible to high flow a op6 turbo with a smaller garrett gt35 68/62 84t turbine wheel and a ss billet compressor for better response than your standard op6 high flow?

I would like 260rwkw with boost before 3800rpm

on 98fuel with supporting mods thanks.

I can use the current turbine end using a SS2 comp wheel. that makes 20psi by 3800RPM.

so yeah, I'm after some more power... however what will be more responsive?

SS2 (current one, externally gated by scotty_nm35 last year)

OR

ATR45SAT ?

I do plan to get HAVOC fab to make me one of those stock manifolds with each pulse merged into a single gate.

^ dirty rb30 lol you know you want too.. :) i reckon his new ss2 sounds like it could be the better option but keen to see what tao thinks

nawwss man.. I like my stock 300000km+ Edward Lee's special edition with 149000 km the dash motor :)

Well I want to push the limits of this motor and see what happens, if it pops.. oh wells RB30 it is lol

  • Like 1

Is there any graph comparing the t67 you do with the new ss2 have a t67 looking for some more midrange looking for

300 on 98 on less the 20 psi

And

Would op6 high flow be too small for a standardish dirty thirty with 25 head?

Mid-high range is good enough for me from the op6 high flow on rb25 and I can even live with how it performs on the lower rpms, but more bottom end torque is always a good thing

Below is correct:

So response wise
Ss1pu>old ss2>op6 high flow?

Is there any graph comparing the t67 you do with the new ss2 have a t67 looking for some more midrange looking for
300 on 98 on less the 20 psi

Search page 1. There are few readings.

The Current ATR45SAT makes way more power that also had about 250RPM better in response.

The new SS2 will do similar with about 200RPM better response to ATR45SAT.

Both of them will do 300rwkws on P98 fuel internally / externally gated at 20psi.

any idea on when we can expect results for the new ss2, and when its available?

my turbo is dead and looking to replace it, wondering whether i should wait for this newer one or just get the current one

The new SS2 is shares the same turbine size as an ATR45SAT model. The very old SS2 and G3 made around 2009 ~ 2012 might work in terms of high flowing, but not the mid 2012~2015 July models, how ever I can offer a discount for people whom wish to upgrade.

This is a high flowed 2011 model ATR43G3 into an ATR45SAT, running an 38mm gate off turbine housing. Car made 492rwhp on 20psi E85 fuel:

enginebay.jpg

Don't have a very clear copy yet. I will upload when I have it. Pretty fat curve for now:

492rwhp.jpg

  • Like 1

Isn't the atr45sat built in a op6 rear(or your own .64 rears) , not .82 ?, so are ss2's in .64 rears now aswell?

Does the ss2 comp wheel fit in a r33/34 nissan comp cover?

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

The Nissan OP6 Rear housing doesn't have enough materials on it for that exhaust wheel. Its going to break a large chunk out of the side, I will then need to make up a patch and weld it back in place. eg:

1.JPG

The amount time spend on it didn't worth the housing plus the latest exhaust wheel is larger then above.

Nissan comp housing is too small for the new wheel, it worn the cold side collar during few high boost evaluations earlier. The T04 .50 comp housing worked best.

  • Like 1

One more announcement to make I wish to make, is my workshop is now opening to public. We will be carrying out all sort of engineering service to every one whom needs any sort of turbocharger related work for very reasonable prices, and for 9 years of turbo related engineering experiences, you will not find better workmanship. So If you wish to build you own dream turbo your own way, here is where you start.

Here are some prices for some basic services. I will keep the list updated.

Individual component balancing for compressor and turbine wheel or Assembly balancing: $100

compwheelbalance.jpg

turbinewheel.jpg

assemblybalance.jpg

VSR simulation and corrections, this is ideal for checkup for used and brand new CHRAs.

vsr.jpg

Turbocharger Compressor profile and machining to suit specific compressor wheel and back plate $150:

housingprofile.jpg

comphosuingfinish.jpg

sittinghousing.jpg

Turbine housing profile and machining $150:

onleathe.jpg

turbinehousingprofile.jpg

Turbocharger Wastgate porting and machining $50

wastegate.jpg

This is a engineering service re-shaping turbocharger back plates to suit different radius and height of given compressor wheel and housings. The cost for this service is $50

onmill.jpg

backplate.jpg

compwheel.jpg

This is a compressor wheel re-bore and re-size service. Our tolerance to perform this operation is under half a thou (1/80 of a mm). This service is perticular useful when people wish to mix and match compressor wheels in between different turbocharger manufactures. Ie. GTX Comp to TD06 Turbine.

The cost to re-bore is $50 and cost to re-size is $50 Per phase (Can be taken from top or top and bottom depending on the length of the turbine shaft and bearing housing used.

gauge.jpg

bore.jpg

skim.jpg

  • Like 6

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
×
×
  • Create New...