Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Lol very true, between boost bleeding off, square wheels and my brake pedal causing earthquakes in my car. I'm having lots of fun chasing problems.

Dont worry mate, my car is a nightmare too. Even Jez has nightmares about my car :thumbsup:

I just dont talk about it too much

Yeh but I'm already onto that and it hasn't costed me any money yet, that's no fun! :P

By the way, hoping to have results for my latest setup around the middle to end of this month. Just need to get my throttle cable issue sorted and then I'll book it in for a tune. VCT should now be working, so fingers crossed I've got it all right this time haha.

what did u do/change to get VCT working?

what did u do/change to get VCT working?

I'm not 100% sure that it is working yet, won't know until it is back on the dyno. I know the solenoid works as I switched it on with an active test using NIStune. So that's all good. I'm fairly sure that my tuner simply disabled the VCT because of the issues my ECU was having with not getting a TCS signal. That has since been taken care of by reprogramming my ECU with a Stagea image and there are no DTC's popping up anymore. So when it goes back on the dyno I will ask him to check that the VCT is setup properly.

The only other thing I can think of is that my timing is out. Whether someone has messed with the cam gear or I have an issue like Luke had where the harmonic balancer was retarding the timing I don't know, that will be the next thing to check if VCT isn't the problem.

Thought I'd post up an annotated version of my dyno sheet to demonstrate how early the SS1PU hybrid actually gets on boost (I think someone asked me?). Maybe I should just ask RP if they can give me an RPM overlay lol.

I used an online speed/RPM calculator and tried my best to get the variables right, so don't quote me on the RPM estimates, but they shouldn't be far off the real figures. I conservatively estimated them in favour of less performance, so they are if anything going to be slightly higher than the real numbers.

209rsc7.jpg

The RPM estimates inside the chart refer to specific points of interest:

3085RPM - Making the full standard boost of 7psi. Does anyone know when the standard turbo makes this? I don't think it's far off the mark. From here boost ramps up very quickly.

3750RPM - Fun times begin here, it's not max boost but it's 95% of it...

4035RPM - Boost finally smooths out to 16psi...I'm guessing it would produce the 20psi somewhere around this point if we were running that in the midrange.

5745RPM - Maximum power made long before redline. This makes it very safe and very streetable.

It's a shame the graph only starts plotting after 2510RPM because, as you can see, it is making a little less than 5psi long before that. I know ramp rates will be different depending on the gear you're in, but as I described previously (and Kasko supported), this turbo is unusual. It feels like it is ALWAYS making some sort of boost, no matter where you are in the rev range. The car just pulls along comfortably where off boost / turbo lag should be, very close to a naturally aspirated vehicle and better than the standard turbo setup. Stao should be paying me for this lol, but it is truly the most streetable turbo upgrade in my opinion, even if you're not chasing all the extra power. Considering how stock my engine bay looks and what this turbo does with those restrictions in mind, anyone concerned about defects should definitely be looking at one!

I think your rpm scale is probably about 200rpm short of where it should be 116km/hr should be about 4140rpm.

Also in regards to the start of the graph being at 5psi that is because the car has been loaded up against the dyno before the run has started.

Still not a bad little turbo for the price, there is a lot better out there but it will cost you a pretty penny premium.

Its been a while seeing the Greedy copies around with few good working examples. So we've imported few. The first one I'm interested to try is the TD06SL2 in 10cm with T3 flange turbine housing running 20G Billet compressor wheel.

It has been pulled apart and rebalanced (tolerance is about twice higher then where I normally set them to, its now corrected). to make sure every thing can work accordingly.

Those turbos are externally gated only and available to every one for $850 including GST and 12 month local warranty. I will refer to it as the EXGBTD06SL2

turbo.jpg

turbine.jpg

Looking through the turbine design, it appears been able to make plenty of torque, but I'm not too sure about response. There is also room in FNT turbine upgrade. I might be able to adapt internal gate onto it with the Nissan 6 bolt flange.

Stao I need to send my turbo back at some stage to get the external wastegate housing made but was thinking do you need one of these turbo's tested?

I'm willing to give it ago for you.

I think your rpm scale is probably about 200rpm short of where it should be 116km/hr should be about 4140rpm.

Based on what?

Also curious on what your variables behind "better" are...are you talking response or power or looking stock or efficiency or cost or ease of installation or...?

Based on what?

Also curious on what your variables behind "better" are...are you talking response or power or looking stock or efficiency or cost or ease of installation or...?

I contest both points also.

1. He could be running a different size tyre which could easily make for a 200rpm variance. If the man knows his car best then the man knows his car best. I wouldnt want to tell a full time owner of a vehicle what speed/gear/rpm should be, hes the one who should know best.

2. Im sure if there was a better 250kw turbo out there we would all be salavating for it and talking about it non stop, instead of pursuing the HG thread daily and pouring hopes and dreams into Kando combinations. I still believe the GTRS is a special item, but short of paying through the nose or picking one of the other 2 mentioned items I dont know what else there is to mention? We havent really seen much else yet.

Im sure once BW EFR's become readily available and we strap a T3 item to an RB the game MIGHT change. Until then, viva la HG/Kando and their recent unholy alliance.

Anyway, haters gonna hate :ph34r:

I'm not saying I can't be wrong or anything, I'd just like to know what he's basing his estimation of 200rpm variance on. I can go and measure it more accurately with the PFC controller to confirm how far out I am (it's speedo reading was very close to mine). I used 265/35/R18 tyres in the calculation plus the standard 4.11 diff ratio and then rounded up the figures, so they should be within ~10rpm unless I got my arithmetic and mm/inch conversions wrong.

I agree Scott, at this power output and maintaining this response, as far as I'm concered the HKS range is the only other contender if you're happy to pay for it. Even then it's not going to look anywhere near as stock, which is what someone like me is concerned with. HGs aren't for everyone, but I don't know what you can successfully challenge the SS1PU on if someone says it's the perfect turbo for their specific application.

Based on what?

Also curious on what your variables behind "better" are...are you talking response or power or looking stock or efficiency or cost or ease of installation or...?

I may be a little out, but if you run a GPS speedo and digital tacho you will have the most accurate way to find out :) Saying that I usually calculate on slightly different diameter tyres and they do change things a little!

"Better" would be better bottom end with similar mid range and top end (and hold power longer). I'm sorry but if you think that your result can go 10 rounds with a GT-RS or AX53B70 I think you are a little misguided.

I concede the GT-RS is probably the power-response king; Scott and I both agree with this. But as I said before, power and response weren't the only demands of the application. When you account for constraints like my standard compressor housing, a catalytic converter, return flow FMIC, boost maxed at 15psi in the top end etc., my SS1PU is running nowhere near it's full potential IMO. And I'm not so sure, given the same constraints, that the GT-RS would be all that far in front, if anything. Which would you rather have sitting under the bonnet when the plod knock on your window?

It's a shame actually, because I've made a little more power than most do using this turbo, I think in part to a very healthy engine and some good tuning, yet I also have one of the most restrictive setups holding back the potential. Stao on the other hand has done everything he can to max the power on one, and when you compare his results to the GT-RS it's six to one and half a dozen to the other.

I'm sorry but if you think that your result can go 10 rounds with a GT-RS or AX53B70 I think you are a little misguided.

I think I would have no issues doing above, infact I know the SS1PU is slightly larger then the GT-RS all around and was pretty consistent when on the dyno. I'll be back with few more wastegate side updates and can do some comparisons with what Trent's got in his PC.

Also found most tuners would retard timing as "insurance" for stock motor when it do hit 20psi. That explains the missing mid range, an update to the wastegate assembly is made, so all new units would have no issues holding boost using EBC with a 14psi actuator. Also the updated module is available for all ATR43 series at a cheap cost.

For that Billet TD06 there is no way it can be modified into a stockie bolton the possition of the turbine outlet is way off to stock 6 bolt nissan pattern. So it will have to be the way it is. I'm planing to let trent do some tests on his New Ceffero.

I might hit you up for a billet once my clutch and tuning is done..

you could sell me just a core or would it be cheaper to put a billet wheel on my turbo?

Let me know when you clutch is sorten. I think I will add the FNT turbine into it as well and make it a more unique TD06 to the generic version.

Could you explain the science behind the FNT or even a diagram showing what it is and how it helps?

Google didn't help me much.

fnt is staos own recipe, google will, not tell you the mans ideas

a typical turbine housing has a single nozzle where the gas ends its path and meets the wheel, stao machines the housing to have 3 nozzles so that the turbine gets 3 channels of precise gas flow and helps it pickup speed faster

seems excessive though to spend $1200-2000 on a clutch for the sort of power were talking about here...

any suggestions for better clutches then that dont go over $1K

Try an "F1 racing" clutch, which also goes by the name "gripforce". I have one in my car and i know of several in cars pushing 300+rwkw and going for 2 years+. Not bad for a $250 clutch :thumbsup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Keen to see the turbosmart data, to date I've only seen negative things in terms of response for them. Very small sample size though.     Hawkins is a big advocate in his videos of the larger rear housings. I managed to make similar power with a lower spec motor on the smaller .8 rear, keeping decentish spool.  The people he works with now are big power cars compared to mine though, mine really is setup to drive around and enjoy.  I don't have any back pressure monitoring though, so couldn't say if its good or bad on my car, just that it does what I want it to do.   Future I want a higher compression more cubes motor to give a bit more bottom end and hopefully the new g35-1150 gets me to the 850 rear comfortably.  But maybe I won't due to exhaust back pressure.
    • No, I refuse to buy their cheap ass crap! I do need to order a bunch of different nuts/bolts to refill my nut/bolt wall though. Maybe you could go for a walk through Bunnings for me? (Or send me some stuff from your work? )   I really struggle to work out how the US standardised to Metric in what the 70s or 80s, and yet, half a century later, there's been little done to actually bring it into fruition. It truly baffles me    On the whole Fastenal thing, I went reading their site (My god they sell a lot of varied stuff!), and it seems like it really depends what store you're near if you can walk in and just grab a few small things, or if that branch is primarily distribution with only a small window of "counter time" available (if at all). That definitely makes it harder, as move locations and it drastically changes your ability for success   For things like your M6x1.0, if you want to work on your own Skyline, and you also have a "home workshop" I'd recommend setting yourself up a small Nut/Bolt wall/section. It doesn't even need to be big at all. Most things depending on the diameter, will be a specific pitch, like the M6x1, M5x0.7 etc. Bigger bolts is mostly 1.5, except for a small number of things and that will come down to torque. From memory bolts for the brake calipers (and other things that need a lot of torque) will end up being a 1.25mm pitch. Save up a few dollars, and order a range of nuts/bolts. If you want to minimise cost a little, buy something like M6 x 40, and M6x70mm (1mm pitch) in both. In addition, buy yourself an M6x1mm thread chaser. That way you have long bolts that you can cut down to size, and then chase the threads out. Funnily enough, I find what I'd pay here for ordering 5 bolts, I can pay about 50% more and you'll get 100 of them.   If that doesn't quite work out due to space / ability to buy plenty up front, then each time you need some bolts, order 100 of what ever you're getting. Put them in clearly marked containers. Over a few years, you'll acquire plenty of different sizes, and will end up ordering less and less. And the cost for 100 bolts won't be much more than you paid for your 5 you needed to order anyway  Just takes a little planning ahead, by investigating what nuts/bolts you'll need, and ordering them before doing the job.     Edit: If it's also primarily for working on just the Skyline, for some reason my brain is screaming that at some point, either Nissan, Nismo, (Or possibly a third party) was selling a "kit" of every nut and bolt in a Skyline, purely for people restoring/rebuilding. It'd likely be quite expensive, but would give you every/any nut/bolt you need for stock/factory things. I'm not sure if it's still available, or even if it actually fully came to market, it's just something niggling in the back of my brain that you could look into further if that sort of thing interested you? (It might have been for the R32 GTR or something specifically too, and not just any Skyline)
    • 90lb/min @ 20psi is wonderful, not so much of a problem with the G35-1050's compressor efficiency (aside from how bad they roll back at higher pressure ratios).  The issue is more to do with the turbine's flow, which is why I'm not sold on going an even higher flowing compressor with the same turbine.  I'd say go back over Motive DVD's testing of the G35 1050 and Hawkins's comments regarding exhaust back pressure issues with it, I'd need to go back but I have in my head he went to the biggest hotside and ended up sacrificing a lot of spool (so it ended up behaving like a bigger turbo) and still had EMAP issues.  I've heard various other experiences along the lines of that. At this stage at least I rate all I've seen about Xonas (for transparency I've not used one directly, but I have spoke plenty with people who have) to have low exhaust restriction for the response they offer for any given setup - basically they allow the engine to breathe, which is good for the engine and makes making power a lot easier.  You arguably don't have to even push quite the same amount of airflow through an engine to make the same power if you don't have the bum plugged up with exhaust gas struggling to escape the engine due to an underflowing turbine.   In terms of reliability, to be fair I've had great luck with Garrett turbos as well - my GT3076R lasted forever, then I sold it and the next owner had no issues, then that car got sold and it was still going strong last I ever heard about it.  The trick is with the old GT-series turbos the compressors etc were no way near as efficient as what we have these days, it was almost hard to push them into severe overspeed situations without having a boost leak or something - and that is what often starts the failure situation.    In terms of your G35 I'm pretty sure you're running yours within sensible limits, something people with Xonas and Precision turbos aren't often so inclined to do.  The "compressor maps" are "Joe blogs ran 45psi through his 6466 so I can do the same" and built their setup to send it to the moon.  I've seen EMAP and compressor speed data where people have actually set that stuff up on Precisions and Xonas which have been run hard and the comp speed numbers are very very exciting at times - like I've seen 76mm Precisions run at rpm that you ideally shouldn't run a G35 1050 lol.   I know people who have run G-series Garretts hard and hard a failure, then replaced them with Pulsar turbos as a cheap "get it going" stop gap with the intent of doing a proper upgrade when THAT fails... and are still running the same thing.   Like anything, ymmv and it's not always to do with the quality or trustworthiness of said product. I've been provided with a bunch of compressor maps for Turbosmart turbos and will update my list based off that, they could prove to interesting reading and an interesting alternative as well.
    • Just cage it, call it a race car, and then fall in love with the chirp chirps through pit area!   Also, this is coming from someone with a completely locked diff...
    • I still have an old R32R left over from when they were a thing in the early 2000's. It was, for its time, done about right. But its time was 20 years ago.  I did try and update it a while back but it was cruelled by a (recommended) muppet of a tuna who couldnt tell his MAP from his TPS. The original spec was: Power FC, 700cc Sards, Nismo pump, 2860-5's, cams (Basically Poncam A's), Z32 AFM's and a half sorted oiling system. Thereabouts 430rwhp irrespective of what was done. So, yeah, very 1990's. I eventually got sick of it not being very refined and bought a Link G4 PNP with some 1000cc Bosch injectors. This was tuned badly and I put the car in the shed for a few years whilst I sulked and went and did other things. Ive come around to the idea of getting it going again so it has a new gearbox installed and some other minor things in the planning. So my questions are, variously (In the context of keeping the Link) What other sensors should I be running eg It has no wideband on it at the moment, nor fuel pressure. $? Is it worth chucking the old ignition system (ignitors etc) for new ignition coils? $2k? Cam/crank angle sensors? Can keep the aircon? $? Anything else? Sorry to launch another what should I do with my car thread but, you know, what should I do with my car? Random photo for historical context.
×
×
  • Create New...