Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ahhhhhh yeh my bad, that may well be the case. I forgot we are talking about an R33 here. Mine is a 34. So it's specifically the Z32/R32 ECU that they don't want to NIStune, not just NIStune in general.

Sorry if I got your hopes up again lol, should have made the connection :blush:

Quick update:

Due to popular demand we've started manufacturing .82 type B Nissan OEM fitting rear housings in batches. This results a saving of $185 per turbine. I will pass it onto our consumers:

82turbinehousings.jpg

The new price for any none billet ATR43 in .82 rear housing is $1265 inc gst, oil line and actuator.

The New price for none billet PU high flow service is $1235 inc gst, oil line and actuator.

New price for externally gated none billet ATR43 in .82 rear housing is $900

Price of all Billet wheel based turbochargers built on .82 rear housings also reduces by the saving amount.

It will also save turn around time from the current 4 working days to 1 working day.

I'll add to that it's probably only R33's they dont want to Nistune.

At the end of the day, i'm not unhappy with the tuner.

I arrived thinking everything was ok because i hadn't boosted it. I tried as best as i could to make sure it was all ok.

But i arrived with maybe a few inferior or defective parts and he did what he could.

I'll do what i can and get it retuned and cross my fingers i guess.

I follow this thread religiously but the amount of abbreviations etc is really starting to get confusing. Now there is type a b and c. Think I will go back 10 or 15 pages and try again:)

I follow this thread religiously but the amount of abbreviations etc is really starting to get confusing. Now there is type a b and c. Think I will go back 10 or 15 pages and try again:)

Maybe stao can edit the first page with all the models and variants listing price, power and response (for r33 at least)

I know there's page references there but a simple table might work well :)

I follow this thread religiously but the amount of abbreviations etc is really starting to get confusing. Now there is type a b and c. Think I will go back 10 or 15 pages and try again:)

lol it's like a good suspense/thriller flick...if you're not paying close attention from the start you miss the important bits and the end doesn't make sense. Second viewing imminent...

The Kando thread is pretty hard to track too...

I've re-made the ATR43 screen print and re-organized the latest dyno sheets into that page, plus I've high lighted couple of important points for power making and turbine housing selection. you can get full details at our website.

Yes. the discount apply to any one orders any ATR43 turbos in .82 rear housing.

I've developed a newer billet prototype that is made to max out the factory exhaust manifold with super fast response. Will post some results once trent's dyno is fixed.

There are some price adjustments done to the SS series turbochargers. The billet SS version will cost $1513 complete with Internal wastegate in OEM Nissan dump pattern with braided oil line, GST inclusive.

Externally gated Billet SS turbochargers is also available for the price of $1150, in T3x.

I've also added some of dyno results from customers cars, which is likely to be archieved in a factory setup using stock engine unless you have have a forgied engine with strengthened head with using a steam pipe exhaust manifold like mine.

Stao. I'm bring in my PU high flow back to you this weekend for the type B rear housing you've got as well as getting the cut out of the adaptor flange. I will post some feedbacks for you once they are back. can't wait :thumbsup:

Further updates:

Been doing couple of drawings and thoughts converting an internally gated turbo to external using the actuator in the direction of where IW would open, it will also be fully hidden.

Also further developments on FNT stack turbine housings involving 60 small nozzles instead of current one. If works good it should give me Type A power with even better response then Type B .82 housing.

Further updates:

Been doing couple of drawings and thoughts converting an internally gated turbo to external using the actuator in the direction of where IW would open, it will also be fully hidden.

Hey Stao, here is a link of an FP product to give you an idea re the above:

http://store.forcedperformance.net/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=FP&Product_Code=NTDSMFP86HTA&Category_Code=Turbo-FP

Thanks for the inputs. Realistically to get more power from stock manifold would be external gating from the manifold. And I've seen that making very noticeable difference. At this stage I'm in the process to engineering a bolton turbo that has such good drivability that it would be suited from anything up to 280rwkws.

On the same time I'm bargaining with brea about this bolton oem steam pipe manifold with external gate port, that makes some externally gated only configurations worth producing, which can have super fast responses with excellent top end power.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You're not wrong, but more than a few times I've heard of people running into issues where their injector characterization isn't quite right and that approach works for that specific configuration but once they switch over to a new set they discover a whole bunch of stuff wasn't set up correctly. It's slightly more annoying to reverse engineer the OEM MAF transfer function but you already have the sensor wired up to the factory harness so keeping it around for a few weeks more while you figure out the tune is easy enough. I've seen GM also use a combination of both MAF + MAP in their ECUs before, MAF is for steady state and a calculation of the cylinder VE to correct the base VE table, then in transients it uses that calculated VE + raw MAP to determine cylinder filling somehow.
    • I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well
    • Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 
    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
×
×
  • Create New...