Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Stao is it possible to fit the SS1PU with the TD06SL2 turbine?

Spool doesn't appear to be any worse, I may consider trialling this on my SR...

SS1PU and SS2 all share the same comp wheel so identical to whats on the TD0620.5G

The SS1PU SR version is in .64 while the 10cm is in .73, The 20.5G can only preform in a high mount externally gates setup, I think you really need to have the car returned in a normal day for the correct power and boost correspondence after run in.

I haven't done the SS1PU RB version against SL2 turbine yet, that should give me an indication of which turbine is more responsive, how ever also need to be taken into consideration that the SS1PU does not require external gate.

I'd be keen to see the difference. I have always been confident that the SL2 turbine is the right way to go on the SR.

I am really happy with my SS1PU, but who doesnt want more! lol

I love you work Stao...own a big share of the bolt on turbo skyline turbo market and a good product at a good price, gets his reign threatened by a another product

buys same product and redesigns it better, effectively taken out his competitor with one foul swoop and in turns merges 2 popular

sau threads into his both of his..roflmao ..well played sir..I tip my hat to you...

(yes im joking, but its still funny)

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

The kia made 110fwkws from 73fwkws on stock injectors and it appears the stock cat back is also maxing out. I've fitted a ATR28G1 on it with high comp engine it has no lag, very fast off the lights. Its at Adaptronics making plug in ECU at moment and its been there for almost 6 month as he has issues getting stock auto to operate. This project is made for a Chinese 4S Kia dealer, Detail write up and photos has been posted at their forums. You might need google translation to read it, but photos are fine.

http://saa.auto.sohu...4673727-1.shtml

Also for people whom's interested in to twin pulse turbine housings. I'm in the process of making one that has a working VNT valve. It is made to work with a single or twin pulse manifold. Designed to switch a .41 A/R turbine housing into .82 after boost pressure rise beyond 12psi, it should dynamically advance down low torque and power while not hurting mid and top end.

will post up photos once its complete.

Well, work wise its all about the amount of time invested, Like I've be in my shed building and trailing different turbos while most of others are out with Mrs lol. All make of turbochargers has its strength and weakness, I don't have a Bias for or against any, but do enjoying improving them as well as putting new ideas into inventions.

Taking my car to the quarter for the first time tonight, see how it goes. Will also get to a weighbridge today sometime.

Ahh spewin I would have come straight from work if I saw this before leaving. Good luck

Stao do you have cam gears in your car? Power peaking in your car at 6800 is unusual for a T67, all the other results have made power right up and past 8000rpm. All your results seem to have strong late mid range and then fall over top end, cam gear timing is the only thing I can think of? Have you talked to Trent about it, I do remembering him commenting on something similar in the past

Good result, would hammer!

for the big turbos playing with gears may help extend the top end but on this car it always trades off low and we are chasing results which fatten the low to mid... aimed at average setups with std cams and 7650 rev limits.... no need for more top end.

For those who want more a set of drop in cammtechs on this 390rwkw will go 420-430rwkw with no changes to mid range as we did one not long ago.

Going through books, The wheel dia of the 20G is in 68mm while the 25G is in 78mm. 10mms is a pretty big jump in terms of compressor wheel dia, I'm wondering what happened to the 21G 22G 23G and 24G if they were ever existed. I have some plans on making a 73mm wheel to run the SL2 turbine on, making size wise a 22G.

Make a 73mm billet wheel with a modified stage 3 sierra wheel and somebody in the US might be calling you about some patent issues lol

Make a 73mm billet wheel with a modified stage 3 sierra wheel and somebody in the US might be calling you about some patent issues lol

Hahaha maybe he could be FORCED into it huh :woot:

So, went and had a bit of fun last night. First time down the quarter, shit is hard :glare: Got 5 runs in and got better each time, first run was a 16.55 missing 2nd and 3rd :P PB was 14.1 @108.5mph on my last run. I think I could have got into the 13's if I could have had a few more runs, and possibly matched Luke's 109. I need a lot more practise though, and shift lights now make sense to me. Was hitting limiter in almost every gear :/

Hahaha maybe he could be FORCED into it huh :woot:

??? some one already done a 73MM? The blade profile will be totally different either way, but thats ok, I can make the exducer into what ever dia to archive the same goal. Sierra wheels are bit old school, they were retired from our turbos since 09.

Using Brae high mount now. Ebay manifold is off the car.

Saw it on Facebook mate and was wondering how long it was going to take for you to post lol.

Close result to me on the airport run

Got a glance at my results at the dinner and it was 14.3 but don't know the kmh

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • In a few years from now, you'll regret that. It'll eat away at you, knowing the truth of the ugly hiding beneath the beautiful exterior... 😛
    • I don't think the G2 profile is particularly dangerous for the engine per se, more just are you actually ok with the turbo lag trade-offs? If the answer is yes then go for it. I personally don't think I'd be ok with it because I spend so much time at lower RPMs and I really enjoy the feeling of being able to stay in 5th gear on the highway and just roll into the throttle to get boost. Or staying in 3rd gear on "gentle canyon cruises" without feeling the turbo lag too badly. The 525 pump should be able to run flat out on factory lines but I would bet the pressure drop from pump to regulator is quite impressive. I don't know how much it would be exactly but I've seen figures like 30 psi thrown around.
    • It's interesting seeing everyone talk about what level of risk they are happy to tolerate.  Building a GTR always has a level of risk, you could be that lucky guy that drops 20k on the engine build alone and still has the thing go pop on the dyno. Life is fun like that.  The way I see it, the thing is a toy to be enjoyed. I'd be happy to turn up the power on stock motor and limit the risk with sensible tuning and engine protection. If it still goes pop, it is what it is. The car isn't a daily driver so it can happily sit while a plan is made to sort it out.  Given this thing will be a street car only, I really feel it's worth the (relatively small if managed well) risk to turn the power up to around 350KW on e85.  I don't think anyone getting into the skyline game now is doing it out of logic. Surely it is a purely emotional decision so I'm not sure how important it is to think about the engine build logically. The heart wants what it wants.  @joshuaho96 little note for Josh, I run my 525 pump flat out all the time and through the factory lines without any issues. (excluding the melting connectors, that's sorted now. we'll pretend it never happened lol)
    • But the Nexus S3 is very expensive and won't be as purpose-built for the application as a separate electronic boost controller :^) More seriously my pet issue here would be that the Walbro 525 running at 100% duty cycle is going to require more FPR than the stock setup can handle. I'm also pretty sure from what I've seen elsewhere you might want to slow down the pump regardless unless you're going to come up with some way of upsizing the fuel lines coming from the fuel tank. Factory 8mm fuel line doesn't actually flow very much if you want to keep pressure drop down between the fuel pump outlet and FPR. If you really want to "keep it simple" I would run only as much pump as you need and source a fuel pump controller to slow down the pump in the vain hope of being able to run stock-style FPRs which are pretty dinky. Or just use the HICAS lines and it should be mostly fine. OP should also really think hard about what profile they'd want out of the turbo. My pet choice here would be the G1 profile rather than anything higher power but YMMV. I already think ~stock turbo lag is pretty bad so I don't want to make it worse. In "gentle canyon cruising" I found that I spent a lot of time around 4-4.5k RPM. I also recommend DIYing labor if you're detail-oriented enough. Costs are high for labor + if you do it yourself you can be your own quality control.
    • GTSBoy is again on the money. My actual advice? Sell the car. (really). For what it's worth as is, you can sidegrade into something much better. If you care about function then this is the actual move. If you want a Skyline to perform, set aside about $100K to do it. This is NOT a typo. You will see right away these are two very different mindsets. Realistically we're talking full restomod for any Skyline still kicking around. Have an honest think about which one you are.. and what you want to do, and how much you want to invest in this (with no return).
×
×
  • Create New...