Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There is usually an occurrence of minor boost creep with colder temperature. Ie 14psi at 30 degrees and 16psi at 10 degrees, I haven't see it going backwards. Perhaps tune or ignition related?

Look at the torque difference at 3k between your SS2 and the latest one.

You'd expect the Neo engine to produce a little more response anyway...I'd think? That latest run is an S2 R33.

That car had a bell mouth dump with a hi-flow cat. On the standard manifold, I was impressed.

The car equipped with the older version SS2 had a ebay exhaust manifold on it during the time. So that difference contributes to the larger exhaust manifold. The differences between those two turbos are minor, how ever the new SS2 has better ability in boost control for internally gated setups.

Definitely a good result, its a good bolton turbo.

I'm pretty sure the new SS1PU will follow the same league, that will be amazing.

Oh ok, lol fail.

There are 2 areas I am dubious of. One being a hose that is a PITA to get to which had cracked previously and I cut down. The other being the EGR port at the back of the IM. I made my own little block off plate for it but I have since sealed the actual EGR valve which I can put back on with an OEM gasket. That will likely be better than a silly piece of alloy.

I'll see if these are an issue :)

I had some issues with cuts and Nistune on the Stagea with load cut. I am not sure how why it can hit the set value while driving but not on the dyno but I lifted the values to the max as any cuts while driving on the road are a little risky.

Do you have the Nistune software to check where Yavuz set the load cut?

That I do not! And the car is unreg so I can't easily take it back to him to have a gander :(

Jez is also miles away so am stuck with very little help. I may need to lash out on some software.

Awesome result Scott. A 13 flat Is nothing to sneeze at on street tires.:) can't wait to see the times you pull when on a full tune. What are you hoping for?

Josh

Cheers!

Re ECU LOL Nah, can't.


I have spent just shy of $3,000 on the Nistune and tuning to get to this point.... Admittedly only half of which relates to the current tune and motor (last setup was a failure), but it is still a mega investment I would feel stupid to give up on.. Resale on the nistune would be next to nothing. I just need to go bark at the tuner about the couple of issues I have with the tune and get it fixed. I believe they relate to the weather on the day of the actual tune, limits were just set too low and a flat spot pre 3k rpm probably couldn't be felt on the dyno.

Am gonna think about investing a little more into better boost control and will simply get the tune tidied up.

Am expecting the final result to fall close to the 260rwkw mark and I think I will snatch a low 12 :) That will be enough for a car that doesn't cause a scene when it comes out to play. Simple car, simply good results.

Its best letting the tuner keep and drive the car for few days which allows him time to explore any minor imperfections. If he believes the ECU is fine and the car is welling behaved well within its command then there isn't much of a point replacing it.

If not invest into an adaptronic plugin ecu. They worth that 3G lose.

Got my 20psi actuator today off stao

Awesome service just ordered yesterday

Looks heavy duty the rod is a lot thicker where the std one is a 10mm locking nut this looks to be a 12 or 13mm

Can't wait to fit it and try to get it to hold 24psi flat and then ill take it to the wsid fingers crossed 11s

It drives so much better than before touch the throttle on 18psi powers there instantly if your cruising a 3krpm it's scary fast if there's no wheel spin where before I had nothing till 4krpm

Sounds awesome man. Glad you like it.

is yours an SS1PU like mine or a G2? Whats the actual spec, stao please confirm?

also Urs is VCT or S13 spec motor?

Here's a dyno sheet of a s14 with the same turbo but no fnt and not e85 it's not perfect comparison but same dyno

the fnt has shifted the powerband towards the left

Mine makes 20psi by 3600rpm his makes it by 4400rpm

S14 make 90kw a 4000rpm mine is making just over 200kw

http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/index.php?app=core&module=attach&section=attach&attach_rel_module=post&attach_id=246012

Edited by hy_rpm

The FNT makes a big difference for sure.

Mine saw 20psi at 4000, but I'm curious to see what it will do when I go back on a cooler day. I've got the S14 motor but its not running VCT. Just S13 spec Poncams and gears. Tuner didn't touch the gears though :(

Admittedly, the powerband is awesome at the moment... I don't need it any stronger and the torque I get at 4k is nonsense. Once I sort my tune I will have to organise a drag night with you. Not gonna go back till I fix this boost/load cut issue. Got to decide what to do about boost control first but.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
    • I know right. It baffled me. There's no way when the engine is off, key is in ignition, (coils are dissconnected aswell), also my sound system was dissconnected (I don't run any audio capacitors), battery reads 12.2v and with the 10amp fuse blown I was measuring 24 to 30v. The reading would move a bit from 30v to 24v which was weird. I took a pic of the multi meter reading 🤣: (This is a brand new single channel digital oscilloscope that also has a multi meter mode).   Before when the fuse was blown, I had one lead on the 12v supply (green/white wires) of that brown relay and the other lead on the negative battery terminal. When I turned the key on ignition (engine off), it would read 30v. Then when I removed that relay from it's plug and tried putting ignition on again, it would read 12v, but I think it's because it can't turn on the ecu now that I removed it. I asked Chatgpt and this is what it had to say:   Not sure if those theories would be possible but, any auto sparkies here? welcome to confirm. 🤷‍♂️  No idea, but if it happens again, atleast I know what type of issue it is, unlike last few months where I didn't know what was causing all my issues and I was just taking stabs in the dark to figure out what type of problem it was. If it does happen again I'm going to investigate futher and trace back the source even more and inspect more circuits. I drove it to work this morning and the car drove and boosted fine. Yeah I was thinking the same, so I've imported my back up saved map (which is the map that I saved when it got done tuning) back onto my haltech with the base fuel pressure set to 43.5psi.
    • Yeh nice, if your in melbourne could you recommend any exhaust shops in the east that do a good job?
    • Sorry yes, this is what im after Also, that jpjdm site appears to be offline
×
×
  • Create New...