Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

+1 for the above - He really will.

Is that new thing suitable for, I dunno, some guy wanting to run a low mount smallish turbo at 28psi on a RB28 auto sedan? ;)

LOL you sir would likely be happier with a straight SS2.

However, the new highflow profile amazes me, and a PU version of that (.82 T3 rear housing) might just rock socks on your motor!

Got some feedbacks from the ATR43SS4 built as a Ford XR6 BA internally gated bolton turbocharger. Its doing 408rwkws on 18psi P98. I think the turbine end is maxing out, it really needs a large external gate for more power.

atr45billet547hp.jpg

LOL knowing the Ford Barra thats probably revving to 6,000... Meaning its on full boost preeeeeetty close to 3,000.

Thought I might just let everyone know.. LOL

Just a heads up to anyone who wants to go bigger then SS2 and go low mount, think again :P

my SS2 JUST fits, But it does fit, Engine is in the car now, cant wait to see how it goes

20131121_161235_zpsffbd6781.jpg

20131121_161244_zpsc9df5de5.jpg

It's not far off from what I can tell. We did some trial fitting and working out exhaust/wastegate configuration on the old engine.

Its probably slightly different but not a whole lot off. But I'd say the stock side mount manifold wouldnt be quite as tight

I cant remember what Stao's Brae manifold is off the top of my head?

Just a heads up to anyone who wants to go bigger then SS2 and go low mount, think again :P

my SS2 JUST fits, But it does fit, Engine is in the car now, cant wait to see how it goes

...

Nice. Does that manifold mount turbo in exactly stock location?

It's not far off from what I can tell. We did some trial fitting and working out exhaust/wastegate configuration on the old engine.

Its probably slightly different but not a whole lot off. But I'd say the stock side mount manifold wouldnt be quite as tight

I cant remember what Stao's Brae manifold is off the top of my head?

It's pretty much the same deal with the stock manifold, my SS2 fits but only just (on an R34). The actuator to chassis clearance is 1 or 2 mm so it's tight. Also due to the overall length of the turbo the intake and OEM intercooler piping will need some customisation. For a direct bolt-on a highflow is the easier option.

Just a heads up to anyone who wants to go bigger then SS2 and go low mount, think again :P

my SS2 JUST fits, But it does fit, Engine is in the car now, cant wait to see how it goes

Wow! Looks pretty cool, but pretty intense - I always kindof liked the idea of a low mount setup but after seeing a couple I'd say it'd be a pain if you had to change turbos haha. Out of interest, depending on what brand you go you can get a MASSIVE amount of power out of that size frame - even the 900hp FP3794HTA turbo uses the same housings as you have there, so I am sure inside and outside of the HG range there is plenty to move up to if you end up needing more power than the SS2 can give you.

Be good to see results :)

Im trying to keep it as legal and non sus as possible while still chasing decent power.

I know the 6boost hardly looks stock but at least theres not a turbo hanging up top lol. Power steering line is fouling on the joiner off the comp housing. Can kinda see it in the first photo. Thats about the only issue

Got some feedbacks from the ATR43SS4 built as a Ford XR6 BA internally gated bolton turbocharger. Its doing 408rwkws on 18psi P98. I think the turbine end is maxing out, it really needs a large external gate for more power.

atr45billet547hp.jpg

Stao..how about you make one with a Gt37 style turbine. like i said in my messages

a while back ...the rb30 boys would be able to use that aswell...Ill even test it on a mid 10 sec car..lol

cheers

darren

Haha, i missed the end.

ATR43G2.5

Keen to see how it goes I have g2.5 and currently underwhelmed with my result and unsure if it's turbo or something else that is lacking.

What was your result and why are you underwhelmed?

250rwkw. Hits hard about 3500/4000 which is good but after that the power just flattens out has no extra go at all pretty much gets the 250kw at 4500 and doesn't climb from there

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Duncan:- it affect both sides.  Driver side is worse.
    • That seems like a very special issue!  Does it affect both sides? Either way, I would disconnect the driver's side switch and see if it still happens, noting that might require removal of the whole door card which is a bit of a pain (it does on V37 and HY51)  
    • MBS206:- The windows start to slowly open themselves. GTSBoy:- Battery is new since Dec. 
    • I currently have a 2008 370GT Coupe, with the big brakes (Akebeno if I'm correct), and Its coming time to get new pads. Previously, I had a 2003 350GT Coupe with the stock sized brakes, not Brembos. I had custom wheels on it that were pretty open to the brakes, and when I first put the wheels on it, the rims where completely coated with brake dust. A few years after adding the new rims, I needed to change to pads on that car. I didn't do any research, but I told the mechanic of the problem with the brake dust. I also told him I didn't track the car or even drive around the streets harshley. But the dust was an issue. The mechanics changed the pads to a different compound, and the dust was GONE! The other change I noted was that when coming to a complete stop, instead of having to press harder on the pedal as I approached 0kph, I had to actually lift off a little to not come to a hard jerky stop.( My unfounded explanation is they became stickier as they heated by stopping ) Since I got my 370gt with big brakes, I noticed that that as I came closer to stopping, I had to press harder and harder to reach a full stop. I am not talking about hard, just harder. I brought the car in from another state, so when I had a blue slip done, I asked the mechanic what he thought of the brakes, and he thought they were brilliant. The only negative of these pads on the 350GT, was that they squealed when cold. So driving out of a shopping center carpark, it was a little embarrassing, as the brakes squealed, and I am sure people thought that I needed new brakes, when they were actually fresh. I have no idea of what type of compound they were on the 350gt, but whatever it was, I want to get the exact same on my 370GT. They weren't ridiculously expensive, and were replaced at the local JAX (which is no longer open), so I am certain they would be a pretty common big brand, off the shelf type/brand. My current mechanic suggested I need top get the rear pads changed soonish, but he suggested standard Brembo pads. Which I expect to behave the same as the current ones and not like the ones on the 350GT.  I don't think dust will be an issue on the 370GT. With the behaviour I describe above on the 360GT, does anyone have a suggestion of pad material that will act like the change I had done on the 350GT?
    • The consult isn't even OBD1. It's a Nissan Consult. Proprietary.   Re read everything I've said. I specifically say, put down the laptop/tablet. Understand, and review the issue first. Logging voltages is the same as logging the converted value. Things like O2 that you say to log, is unusable for this, whether it be the voltage, or the value the ECU thinks.   The fact you don't know how to diagnose without looking at the computer, is exactly what I've said multiple times is the issue for why techs these days can't diagnose the fun issues with cars.
×
×
  • Create New...