Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

+1 for the above - He really will.

Is that new thing suitable for, I dunno, some guy wanting to run a low mount smallish turbo at 28psi on a RB28 auto sedan? ;)

LOL you sir would likely be happier with a straight SS2.

However, the new highflow profile amazes me, and a PU version of that (.82 T3 rear housing) might just rock socks on your motor!

Got some feedbacks from the ATR43SS4 built as a Ford XR6 BA internally gated bolton turbocharger. Its doing 408rwkws on 18psi P98. I think the turbine end is maxing out, it really needs a large external gate for more power.

atr45billet547hp.jpg

LOL knowing the Ford Barra thats probably revving to 6,000... Meaning its on full boost preeeeeetty close to 3,000.

Thought I might just let everyone know.. LOL

Just a heads up to anyone who wants to go bigger then SS2 and go low mount, think again :P

my SS2 JUST fits, But it does fit, Engine is in the car now, cant wait to see how it goes

20131121_161235_zpsffbd6781.jpg

20131121_161244_zpsc9df5de5.jpg

It's not far off from what I can tell. We did some trial fitting and working out exhaust/wastegate configuration on the old engine.

Its probably slightly different but not a whole lot off. But I'd say the stock side mount manifold wouldnt be quite as tight

I cant remember what Stao's Brae manifold is off the top of my head?

Just a heads up to anyone who wants to go bigger then SS2 and go low mount, think again :P

my SS2 JUST fits, But it does fit, Engine is in the car now, cant wait to see how it goes

...

Nice. Does that manifold mount turbo in exactly stock location?

It's not far off from what I can tell. We did some trial fitting and working out exhaust/wastegate configuration on the old engine.

Its probably slightly different but not a whole lot off. But I'd say the stock side mount manifold wouldnt be quite as tight

I cant remember what Stao's Brae manifold is off the top of my head?

It's pretty much the same deal with the stock manifold, my SS2 fits but only just (on an R34). The actuator to chassis clearance is 1 or 2 mm so it's tight. Also due to the overall length of the turbo the intake and OEM intercooler piping will need some customisation. For a direct bolt-on a highflow is the easier option.

Just a heads up to anyone who wants to go bigger then SS2 and go low mount, think again :P

my SS2 JUST fits, But it does fit, Engine is in the car now, cant wait to see how it goes

Wow! Looks pretty cool, but pretty intense - I always kindof liked the idea of a low mount setup but after seeing a couple I'd say it'd be a pain if you had to change turbos haha. Out of interest, depending on what brand you go you can get a MASSIVE amount of power out of that size frame - even the 900hp FP3794HTA turbo uses the same housings as you have there, so I am sure inside and outside of the HG range there is plenty to move up to if you end up needing more power than the SS2 can give you.

Be good to see results :)

Im trying to keep it as legal and non sus as possible while still chasing decent power.

I know the 6boost hardly looks stock but at least theres not a turbo hanging up top lol. Power steering line is fouling on the joiner off the comp housing. Can kinda see it in the first photo. Thats about the only issue

Got some feedbacks from the ATR43SS4 built as a Ford XR6 BA internally gated bolton turbocharger. Its doing 408rwkws on 18psi P98. I think the turbine end is maxing out, it really needs a large external gate for more power.

atr45billet547hp.jpg

Stao..how about you make one with a Gt37 style turbine. like i said in my messages

a while back ...the rb30 boys would be able to use that aswell...Ill even test it on a mid 10 sec car..lol

cheers

darren

Haha, i missed the end.

ATR43G2.5

Keen to see how it goes I have g2.5 and currently underwhelmed with my result and unsure if it's turbo or something else that is lacking.

What was your result and why are you underwhelmed?

250rwkw. Hits hard about 3500/4000 which is good but after that the power just flattens out has no extra go at all pretty much gets the 250kw at 4500 and doesn't climb from there

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • H2 (for cars) will never happen. It's not reasonable for any number of reasons. It's also not reasonable for almost all of the industrial uses that the fanbois say that it will be used for, again for a large number of reasons. There are some cases where it will be good. But, even those will be massively hampered by the economics. The only way that H2 can be economic is if we somehow manage to get from where we are to the other side of the economic-valley-of-death in which no-one can operate. You need there to be sufficient renewable generated electricity to be available so that it is effectively free. Once you are there, you can do whatever the hell you want and hang the efficiency. But until you get there, the ever diminishing value of electricity makes it harder and harder to encourage businesses to build the new generation capacity, and they will simply stop investing in generation projects. (I kinda think there needs to be just government money spent on building the required capacity in a non-commercial way, similar to how the first fossil fueled grids were built, as national-government owned utilities. And probably some nuclear in there to start. But this all should have started 10-15 years ago to avoid the chasm of death that we face right now). Synth fuels will be much more likely, but will only occur is there is at least some renewable H2 production, because you need H2 to do it. And you need stacks of free (or at least extraordinarily cheap) energy because assembling molecules back into fuels is exactly the opposite process to burning the fuel, and the reason we burn fuels is because there is so much energy squeezed into each molecule. So you're somewhat subject to the same economic valley of death problem as above anyway. That is unless people are willing to pay the current equivalent of $5 or $6 per litre of petrol-ish liquid fuels. Can you imagine it? The squealing at $2 now is bad enough.
    • This is so cool. Get a dashcam that records audio and hopefully you'll catch it.  Maybe there's a brand or some kind of markings on the back ? Are the pics hand drawn? I love it so much.
    • Hahaha yep, point(s) taken. I just like seeing different things and an EV in an R32 is pretty different. I'm not on the EV band wagon, I'm waiting for synthetic fuels or hydrogen personally. 
    • I mean it's probably likely that people overestimate their skills in dialling in a setup and noticing the changes. I had SK shocks and springs, and added heavier springs and got them revalved by Sydney Shocks to suit based upon what I told them I wanted the car to handle like. I got back a completely different feeling set of shocks, which probably (?) feel great on track but holy hell are they rough on tram tracks and the like. The shock dyno actually looks pretty similar to Shockworks (from what I can surmise from a screenshot of a youtube video - and my dyno printout...) Truth be told I doubt I'd be any faster or slower with either setup, or camber/castor combination. I also had whiteline eccentric castor bushes up front of my R34. I removed them and put in poly non-adjustable ones to soothe my OCD (nobody ever set the castor the same side to side, and it'd be near impossible to do) and be happy the wheel is centered in the well now for clearance reasons. Yes I wanted it to move 1mm 'back' :p I've effectively set my castor back to stock, negating all the benefits of that which is supposedly massive. I've probably also altered toe and camber in a negative (detrimental) way. I can't tell any difference steering the car.
×
×
  • Create New...