Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Why bump lol?

I took my cat out today to have a look, but it doesn't look melted from what I can see. I am however still doubting how well it flows, as the entrance to the cat was very very dirty and black while the exit was almost as clean as when I put it in there. Not sure if that is normal for a high flow. I also tried shining a torch down one end and looking down the other, and hardly any light makes it through. You can only just see the light coming through to the other side. Normal?

For the lash setup there isn't much of choice, I only found Tomei Type A, B and Supertech. It appears the supertech ones are 15LBs stronger then the Tomei Type B spring kit. I will be using those.

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Supertech-Valve-Spr...=item3a52093c3b

Hanalado: The cat won't appears as melted like butter. a good performance cat has very big cells. Ie. 120 cells in a 4inch barrel. Also been a .63 rear housing the amount of lag you've got is greater then people using a .82 rear housing. I would suspect leaks on the intake side which including unsecured spark plugs, BOV, head, plus all clamps and hoses.

Hrmmm Im about to change the cams and clean the lifters and go for a retune now Im wondering how worthwhile it would be to change the springs while I got it all out.

Why bump lol?

I took my cat out today to have a look, but it doesn't look melted from what I can see. I am however still doubting how well it flows, as the entrance to the cat was very very dirty and black while the exit was almost as clean as when I put it in there. Not sure if that is normal for a high flow. I also tried shining a torch down one end and looking down the other, and hardly any light makes it through. You can only just see the light coming through to the other side. Normal?

We had a s13 silvia lose 40kw by fittin a cheap highflow cat. Putting the decat pipe straight back in giving it a run without changing anything went from 205 to to 245kw

Hrmmm Im about to change the cams and clean the lifters and go for a retune now Im wondering how worthwhile it would be to change the springs while I got it all out.

Emphatically, YES.

Regardless of whether you're paying for someone else's time, or using your own time, dropping in new valve springs while cams are out is a no-brainer. Just got to be sure the method used will ensure the valves don't drop down into the chamber.

I hate having to go back over my own work to make an improvement I could/should have made the first time around.

Why bump lol?

I took my cat out today to have a look, but it doesn't look melted from what I can see. I am however still doubting how well it flows, as the entrance to the cat was very very dirty and black while the exit was almost as clean as when I put it in there. Not sure if that is normal for a high flow. I also tried shining a torch down one end and looking down the other, and hardly any light makes it through. You can only just see the light coming through to the other side. Normal?

what brand and type of cat?

For the lash setup there isn't much of choice, I only found Tomei Type A, B and Supertech. It appears the supertech ones are 15LBs stronger then the Tomei Type B spring kit. I will be using those.

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Supertech-Valve-Spr...=item3a52093c3b

Hanalado: The cat won't appears as melted like butter. a good performance cat has very big cells. Ie. 120 cells in a 4inch barrel. Also been a .63 rear housing the amount of lag you've got is greater then people using a .82 rear housing. I would suspect leaks on the intake side which including unsecured spark plugs, BOV, head, plus all clamps and hoses.

thanks stao!! keep us updated!!

what brand and type of cat?

Cheapo brand, Venom or something. Advertised as a 100 cell high flow, 3" inlet/outlet with 5" body. I never really expected it to be that good, but I didn't have the money to pay $400+ for a cat.

I was going to gut the cat, but don't want to change anything until my tuner has his dyno back and can check the tune, make sure it's not leaning out. I'm also not really keen on running a decat, so will probably save for one of the expensive brand name cats.

Cheapo brand, Venom or something. Advertised as a 100 cell high flow, 3" inlet/outlet with 5" body. I never really expected it to be that good, but I didn't have the money to pay $400+ for a cat.

I was going to gut the cat, but don't want to change anything until my tuner has his dyno back and can check the tune, make sure it's not leaning out. I'm also not really keen on running a decat, so will probably save for one of the expensive brand name cats.

i'd consider a new one

just don't buy an xforce one, pretty much the only car guaranteed not to pass emissions tests

something like this will be fine http://www.justjap.com/store/product.php?p...=275&page=1

regarding the x-force one, they say it meets Euro 3 emissions standards or something...I take it that's not enough for Aus?

Also, I wouldn't particularly recommend using that Just Jap one either - since it doesn't specify, I'd assume it's ceramic? That'd be a stupid move to put another ceramic cat back in.

Yup stuff the ceramic. I bit the bullet and bought this metal cat:

http://www.justjap.com/store/product.php?p...cat=&page=1

It has served me well and dynos between cat and no cat were within 5-10kw.

Yeh that's a race cat though, just as illegal as a decat.

What's the deal with ceramic cats? I know they are shit when it comes to modified cars, but why can they not handle the heat? I thought ceramic was meant to be one of the best materials for dealing with heat?

What's the deal with ceramic cats? I know they are shit when it comes to modified cars, but why can they not handle the heat? I thought ceramic was meant to be one of the best materials for dealing with heat?

I think the amount of stock ceramic turbo wheels vs the amount of steel turbo wheels that end up in the cat is good evidence that it is not.

Why this is I do not know, you are correct ceramic is meant to be tougher and withstand higher temperatures, perhaps it degrades faster over time and steel does not? Maybe it is more brittle and cracks easier.

edit: apparently ceramic is cheaper and hence tends to be used in much cheaper manufacturing processes with more flaws which is why they are generally worse, if they were made to the same standard as the expensive steel ones they would perform better, at least that's what the reading I just did told me.

Are all the melted ones we see stock cats? or are we seeing aftermarket ceramic ones melt as well?

Edited by Rolls
Yeh that's a race cat though, just as illegal as a decat.

Incorrect:

http://www.catco.com.au/mainFrameset.htm

CATCO METALcats are ADR approved AND meet EPA requirements

I think the amount of stock ceramic turbo wheels vs the amount of steel turbo wheels that end up in the cat is good evidence that it is not.

Why this is I do not know, you are correct ceramic is meant to be tougher and withstand higher temperatures, perhaps it degrades faster over time and steel does not? Maybe it is more brittle and cracks easier.

Sorry mate, incorrect. There are 2 issues with ceramic turbos.

Number 1 is, the shaft is not ceramic, the wheel only is ceramic which in most cases is fixed to the shaft by an epoxy. When EGT gets too high the epoxy melts and the wheel becomes dislodged. This is why the turbo is generally left with no trace of the wheel beyond the shaft.

Number 2 is the ceramic wheel expands and makes contact with the housing more so than a steel wheel. This sees the wheel shatter in an instant.

Number 2 was shown when the $250 high flow thread was around, porting the rear housing to drop surge proved to also drop EGT which made the turbo last a lot longer (with the standard ceramic rear wheel and at 17psi).

Also you are correct in saying that metal cats melt, not ceramics. Ceramics collapse.

Sorry mate, incorrect. There are 2 issues with ceramic turbos.

Number 1 is, the shaft is not ceramic, the wheel only is ceramic which in most cases is fixed to the shaft by an epoxy. When EGT gets too high the epoxy melts and the wheel becomes dislodged. This is why the turbo is generally left with no trace of the wheel beyond the shaft.

Number 2 is the ceramic wheel expands and makes contact with the housing more so than a steel wheel. This sees the wheel shatter in an instant.

Number 2 was shown when the $250 high flow thread was around, porting the rear housing to drop surge proved to also drop EGT which made the turbo last a lot longer (with the standard ceramic rear wheel and at 17psi).

Also you are correct in saying that metal cats melt, not ceramics. Ceramics collapse.

I should have taken photos of the guts from mine when I bashed it out....well, I might still be able to find them on the ground so I may very well back this up. Mine most certainly was melted. Maybe not from heat as such, could have been acidic melt if any of the unburnt fuel could possibly do this....but it was definitely melted. And as far as I know it was aftermarket as the heat shielding was branded CATCO

Sorry mate, incorrect. There are 2 issues with ceramic turbos.

Number 1 is, the shaft is not ceramic, the wheel only is ceramic which in most cases is fixed to the shaft by an epoxy. When EGT gets too high the epoxy melts and the wheel becomes dislodged. This is why the turbo is generally left with no trace of the wheel beyond the shaft.

Number 2 is the ceramic wheel expands and makes contact with the housing more so than a steel wheel. This sees the wheel shatter in an instant.

Number 2 was shown when the $250 high flow thread was around, porting the rear housing to drop surge proved to also drop EGT which made the turbo last a lot longer (with the standard ceramic rear wheel and at 17psi).

Also you are correct in saying that metal cats melt, not ceramics. Ceramics collapse.

Thanks for the post, I did not know it was the expoxy that failed in the turbos along with expansion, cheers for clearing that up.

Re the cats melting, all I was getting at is they fail, I am still unsure why though as ceramic is meant to be harder, stronger and able to withstand higher temps.

Perhaps it is the expansion in the ceramic cats that causes them to fracture and collapse.

Edited by Rolls
I should have taken photos of the guts from mine when I bashed it out....well, I might still be able to find them on the ground so I may very well back this up. Mine most certainly was melted. Maybe not from heat as such, could have been acidic melt if any of the unburnt fuel could possibly do this....but it was definitely melted. And as far as I know it was aftermarket as the heat shielding was branded CATCO

Obviously it is possible for the thing to melt, yet not common.

Keep in mind the exterior of a space shuttle is also ceramic. If your cat was subject to some atmospheric re-entry temperature, you present quite the challenge!

Obviously it is possible for the thing to melt, yet not common.

Keep in mind the exterior of a space shuttle is also ceramic. If your cat was subject to some atmospheric re-entry temperature, you present quite the challenge!

lol there are different types of ceramics :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
×
×
  • Create New...