Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

not exactly...there is a way to keep everything friendly. Its doesn't involve pistons either.

A 1.8mm head gasket is not sufficient a-mod for clearance of lift of this nature. At high revs you also need DAMN strong valve springs for that lift.

People put universal blue on the crowns, put head on, cam belt etc and do a few rotations of the crank, remove the head and look for valve marks. This method, although indicative, can not account for valve expansion due to the heat transfered to it combined with the oscillary motion causing it to not only stretch in length, but also move sideways as it exits the guide. Upping the lift exposes more valve and the sway increases exponentially.

Even the Tomei website state that if you exceed 10.2mm in lift, you need to scallop them (and they do it for free when you buy pistons off them). Tomei pistons are also 0.4mm lower than std, allowing decompression for more boost but also higher lift.

End of the day, it's the owners choice. My question is, do you REALLY want to risk an entire engine?

Edited by pure_methamphetamachine
A 1.8mm head gasket is not sufficient a-mod for clearance of lift of this nature. At high revs you also need DAMN strong valve springs for that lift.

People put universal blue on the crowns, put head on, cam belt etc and do a few rotations of the crank, remove the head and look for valve marks. This method, although indicative, can not account for valve expansion due to the heat transfered to it combined with the oscillary motion causing it to not only stretch in length, but also move sideways as it exits the guide. Upping the lift exposes more valve and the sway increases exponentially.

Even the Tomei website state that if you exceed 10.2mm in lift, you need to scallop them (and they do it for free when you buy pistons off them). Tomei pistons are also 0.4mm lower than std, allowing decompression for more boost but also higher lift.

End of the day, it's the owners choice. My question is, do you REALLY want to risk an entire engine?

my engine seems to live quite happily at 9500rpm+ using 11mm+ cams using my method. No piston mods whatsoever.

Edited by DiRTgarage

I'm not saying it is not possible, there are just too many risks to not justify doing it. If you skim the head, if so how much, had it already been done, are you using REALLY good valve springs etc.

Just not a risk I'd be willing to take, that's all.

I'm not saying it is not possible, there are just too many risks to not justify doing it. If you skim the head, if so how much, had it already been done, are you using REALLY good valve springs etc.

Just not a risk I'd be willing to take, that's all.

i see where you are coming from but you must understand im actually building these engines and putting them through more stress than joe average...not just some internet mechanic with an opinion. I always use top quality components and have recently changed spring brands as we have had excellent results with another brand we recently tested.

I have seen builds by 'pro' engine builders go pear shaped quickly due to some guys thinking building high horsepower/high revving RB's is an easy thing to do. There are quite a few pitfalls when building big engines that if you are unaware of can come back to bite you on the ass very hard.

i see where you are coming from but you must understand im actually building these engines and putting them through more stress than joe average...not just some internet mechanic with an opinion. I always use top quality components and have recently changed spring brands as we have had excellent results with another brand we recently tested.

I have seen builds by 'pro' engine builders go pear shaped quickly due to some guys thinking building high horsepower/high revving RB's is an easy thing to do. There are quite a few pitfalls when building big engines that if you are unaware of can come back to bite you on the ass very hard.

I am neither bagging nor doubting you. It is just my opinion. And yes, I too have seen many "pro" build engines that fail instantly. Yet they never seem to learn...

Bugger about the cams dude. How the f did they manage to break?

  • 9 months later...
paul - my cams are as follows:

A269IN (inlet) has 'U6' stamped on it

A252X (exhuast) has 'U7' stamped on it

lift are identical @ 9.15mm (as per my vernier)

My question refers to the information I have quoted above.

I have purchased a secondhand set of tomei 'b's for my 26. Correct boxes, looks the same as any photos, but absolutely no manufacturer markings or part numbers on the cams thamselves, other than u6 on the intake and u5 on the exhaust. Not really trusting myself with measurement off the callipers I have here, but definitely more lift than stock.

Does the 'u' number actually have any relevance?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I swear at my GKTech ones every time I have to take them apart and replace a spherical. But I wouldn't swap them for anything else. They absolutely slay every other option, at least in terms of how they actually work. You sure you don't want to live with bearings? I mean, they don't have "ball bearings". They are rod ends and sphericals throughout. Tough as nuts, even though I have found more than one way to wear them out.
    • From when I was looking at getting the 86 engineered for the turbo, the joint said to put in a few euro 5 or 6 cats, then tune the car on a nice clean E85 tune When I was looking at a turbo for the MX5, it was basically the same thing, a couple of cats and a nice clean tune Although, it will depend on the year of the Jeep IRT emmisions standards required, and what mods are done, especially if it has a newer engine installed that requires a higher Euro
    • Yeah - but it's not actually that easy. There are limits for HC, CO, NOx and particulates. Particulates shouldn't be a concern in any petrol engine unless trying to comply to the very latest Euro standard. But getting a tune right so that all the others stay within limits AT THE SAME TIME is not a trivial exercise. You couldn't possibly get it right by just guessing at the tuner's dyno, unless he had a 4 gas analyser up the pipe, which is not often the case these days. It used to be. Every decent shop that did "tune ups" (as opposed to tuning) would have a 4 gas analsyer. Perhaps there's still quite a few of them around these days. But most "tuners" are only watching O2 and power readings.
    • Slight segway but the most expensive part of the whole thing which I would have thought would only be required for an engine size/type swap, not a VIV test, is emissions testing.  That's when you get into the big bucks.  I can't remember the exact price now but I got quotes for the GT-R based on swapping to RB30 (not that anyone bothers doing it legally anymore...) and it was around $4500 just for that alone.  The guy that does them manipulates the tune on the vehicle to make sure it passes.  The cheaper option is to book into Kangan Batman Tafe (I think that's where it was) and hire their tester.  Allegedly you're not allowed in there with the car though so not in a position to tweak anything to make sure the vehicle passes.  I'm sure in this day and age of ultra tuneable ECU's you could get the tuner to program a special efficiency (clean) tune that emits the lowest amount of particulates possible that would pass the test.  It might only make 50kW's but as long as it passed who cares!
    • I'm sure he has left signs, or, he is looking down, laughing That's my cunning plan for when I leave, lots of half finished projects, with no rhyme or reason of where I was actually up to, just to keep everyone on their toes
×
×
  • Create New...