Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1996 SUBARU WRX SEDAN

LOW KMS - 100, 000KMS

CUSTOM PAINT - BLACK WITH RED PEARL

ALWAYS SERVICED - EVERY 5000KMS WITH 5W-50 OIL.

THOUSANDS SPENT ON MODIFICATIONS

STI (D-FORCE) FRONT LIP

SUPRA REAR WING

LOWERED ON STI ADJUSTABLE CONTROLLER ARMS

LOWERED ON STI SPRINGS AND SHOCKS

STI RATIO GEARBOX FROM 96 WRX STI RA - STRENGTHENED

3 INCH EXHAUST FROM TURBO INCLUDING DUMP PIPE

VF22/SR40 420HP HYBRID TURBO

APEXI POWER FC ENGINE MANAGEMENT COMPUTER

APEXI ELECTRONIC BOOST CONTROLLER

K AND N POD AIR FILTER

BLITZ BLOW OFF VALVE

CUSCO STRUT BRACES

BLITZ GUAGES - BOOST AND EXHAUST

CD PLAYER - PIONEER

SPEAKERS - 6 INCH SPLITS AND 6 INCH REARS

SPEAKER AMP

FRONT MOUNT INTERCOOLER - NOT YET FITTED

GOLD RIMS

LARGE 4 1/2 STAINLESS STEEL MUFFLER

DYNO TUNED

TURBO SMART BOOST CONTROLLER

BUCKET SEATS - FROM 1997 MODEL WRX.

IRIDIUM SPARK PLUGS

BOSCH COIL PACKS

SPARE SET OF TYRES WITH 15INCH RIMS

IMMACULATE INSIDE AND OUT.

URGENT SALE

$21 750 ONO

WILL NOT GET A BETTER WRX FOR THIS PRICE!!!!

PHONE NO: 0413 249 333

hey guys, all pics will be up tonight! will email them to you all.

reason for selling is i am looking at buying a skyline.

running is easy at the moment on only 15psi and its getting 159.4kw@wheels. capable of heaps more with this setup.

with the cooler fitted should be looking at close to 19psi and 190+kw which is a very fast 12 sec WRX.

check www.geocities.com/r33forsale I was originally advertising for 33,000K, but Am now looking for a outright saleprice of 29K or Trade (with cash adjustment)

Also see the thread:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...&threadid=23098

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
    • Holy hell! That is absolutely stunning! Great work!!!
    • It does when you start adding everything else in. But it's not just compute. It's the logic. Getting your timing right (I'm not meaning ignition timing for the engine). Making sure of your memory mappings, seeing your interrupts. Microcontroller devices only have so much capacity. For the most part, you want all those timers and interrupts in use on your engine control, which means you're left with less than ideal methods for timing and management of other control functions.   Let's put it this way, my job is all about building custom hardware, that goes into cars, and integrates with them. We're also waiting on a media confirmation from SpaceX too fora world first we've just completed with them in NZ too. It's not just the little toys I play with. But you know, you can think and believe what you want.
    • I don't think it's a good buy, the trend looks bad     lol.
×
×
  • Create New...