Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

FYI People

Just heard that channel 7 is at an accident scene ATM gathering footage of a red R33 that has taken out a stobie pole on Port Rd.

We're going to be completely F#*Ked if this doesn't stop for at least 6 months.

EDIT!!

Apparently it was a 32 not a 33

Edited by D_Stirls
FYI People

Just heard that channel 7 is at an accident scene ATM gathering footage of a red R33 that has taken out a stobie pole on Port Rd.

We're going to be completely F#*Ked if this doesn't stop for at least 6 months.

not watching the new atm, is it severe? or just injuries?

hope its not a speeding incident :P

ted180, I was prepared to overlook the fact that you were posting a banned members thoughts in a post.....up until the cheap shot.

So as Andrew said earlier about monitoring IP's, posting thru another member is no different......banned means banned!

You have therefore scored yourself a warning and you can thank Nisskid for that........for anyone else wishing to post banned members posts.....don't do it, otherwise what's the point of even giving someone time out?!

FYI People

Just heard that channel 7 is at an accident scene ATM gathering footage of a red R33 that has taken out a stobie pole on Port Rd.

We're going to be completely F#*Ked if this doesn't stop for at least 6 months.

Hope they are okay and like Unit Zero said hope it wasnt a speeding incident.

A Skyline aint the only car which can take out a stobie though......

Edited by 93GTST
Hope they are okay and like Unit Zero said hope it wasnt a speeding incident.

A Skyline aint the only car which can take out a stobie though......

That's not the point though because you can bet your ass that isn't what the news will be saying tonight.

That's not the point though because you can bet your ass that isn't what the news will be saying tonight.

Yeah thats right, what you just said is what I meant. Maybe I should have used a different choice of words :P

EDIT -

Your post was fine up until that line.

I honestly don't see what was wrong with that, it was a genuine disclaimer, last time he posted about defects it was misinterpreted as a personal attack on sled, to remove any doubt he made sure it was known it had no subliminal value. It was either post it as is and risk another misinterpretation, extending the ban, or making it clear it wasn't a personal attack, seemed like the responsible thing to do.

Ultimately, you can't really expect to ban a member for a 100% innocent post that you misinterpreted, and not expect to leave a bitter taste in their mouth.

I honestly don't see what was wrong with that, it was a genuine disclaimer, last time he posted about defects it was misinterpreted as a personal attack on sled, to remove any doubt he made sure it was known it had no subliminal value. It was either post it as is and risk another misinterpretation, extending the ban, or making it clear it wasn't a personal attack, seemed like the responsible thing to do.

Ultimately, you can't really expect to ban a member for a 100% innocent post that you misinterpreted, and not expect to leave a bitter taste in their mouth.

Well I'm not getting into the nitty gritty of your beef, however for some reason you (nisskid) were banned - now if you don't like that, you can always appeal to the other mods of the board, I'm sure they will hear you out and decide for themselves if sled was being out of line. Or, sometimes its easier to just cop the holiday and let things pass naturally. It would have been a 100% innocent post but you mentioned his name - I take this as a baiting... there just simply wasn't any need for it.

And ted, you probably should have known better than to post for a temporarily banned member... but it seems like you only ever post negative comments these days so I doubt my words would mean anything to you at this stage.

-D

I don't give a rats about the content......DONT POST ON BEHALF OF BANNED MEMBERS!!
ted180, I was prepared to overlook the fact that you were posting a banned members thoughts in a post.....up until the cheap shot.

So what cheap shot were you referring to then?

Well I'm not getting into the nitty gritty of your beef, however for some reason you (nisskid) were banned - now if you don't like that, you can always appeal to the other mods of the board, I'm sure they will hear you out and decide for themselves if sled was being out of line. Or, sometimes its easier to just cop the holiday and let things pass naturally. It would have been a 100% innocent post but you mentioned his name - I take this as a baiting... there just simply wasn't any need for it.

And ted, you probably should have known better than to post for a temporarily banned member... but it seems like you only ever post negative comments these days so I doubt my words would mean anything to you at this stage.

-D

The 100% innocent comment that he was banned for never mentioned his name, it had nothing to do with SLED. This is the post that he was banned for:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=4511506

He was banned on the grounds that Sled thought the post was subliminally directed at him as a mod.

You be the judge.

The 100% innocent comment that he was banned for never mentioned his name, it had nothing to do with SLED. This is the post that he was banned for:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=4511506

He was banned on the grounds that Sled thought the post was subliminally directed at him as a mod.

You be the judge.

Actually he was banned for the posts leading up to post #57 (on page 3) as well I suspect some PM arguments that were previously alluded to.. it just so happens that sled didnt respond to it until you'd already posted again, an estimated duration of 6 hours difference. like I said, I'm not going to get into whether or not either one of you are right, simply because I just don't care. However if you have an axe to grind against any single mod, speak to the rest of the mods and make an official complaint. Fighting in public is undignified.

-D

and there we go the opening story on Channel 7, i only saw the last 15 seconds though but they were questioning the power and availability of the performance import vehicles dues to their low cost. They claimed than Vinh's WRX only cost $11,000.

Well done Nene.. This looks like a step in the right direction :P

Tho Neils comments seem broad and normal but him making the contact is atleast nice..

Has Neil helped out on any cruises yet that SAU has organised?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I swear at my GKTech ones every time I have to take them apart and replace a spherical. But I wouldn't swap them for anything else. They absolutely slay every other option, at least in terms of how they actually work. You sure you don't want to live with bearings? I mean, they don't have "ball bearings". They are rod ends and sphericals throughout. Tough as nuts, even though I have found more than one way to wear them out.
    • From when I was looking at getting the 86 engineered for the turbo, the joint said to put in a few euro 5 or 6 cats, then tune the car on a nice clean E85 tune When I was looking at a turbo for the MX5, it was basically the same thing, a couple of cats and a nice clean tune Although, it will depend on the year of the Jeep IRT emmisions standards required, and what mods are done, especially if it has a newer engine installed that requires a higher Euro
    • Yeah - but it's not actually that easy. There are limits for HC, CO, NOx and particulates. Particulates shouldn't be a concern in any petrol engine unless trying to comply to the very latest Euro standard. But getting a tune right so that all the others stay within limits AT THE SAME TIME is not a trivial exercise. You couldn't possibly get it right by just guessing at the tuner's dyno, unless he had a 4 gas analyser up the pipe, which is not often the case these days. It used to be. Every decent shop that did "tune ups" (as opposed to tuning) would have a 4 gas analsyer. Perhaps there's still quite a few of them around these days. But most "tuners" are only watching O2 and power readings.
    • Slight segway but the most expensive part of the whole thing which I would have thought would only be required for an engine size/type swap, not a VIV test, is emissions testing.  That's when you get into the big bucks.  I can't remember the exact price now but I got quotes for the GT-R based on swapping to RB30 (not that anyone bothers doing it legally anymore...) and it was around $4500 just for that alone.  The guy that does them manipulates the tune on the vehicle to make sure it passes.  The cheaper option is to book into Kangan Batman Tafe (I think that's where it was) and hire their tester.  Allegedly you're not allowed in there with the car though so not in a position to tweak anything to make sure the vehicle passes.  I'm sure in this day and age of ultra tuneable ECU's you could get the tuner to program a special efficiency (clean) tune that emits the lowest amount of particulates possible that would pass the test.  It might only make 50kW's but as long as it passed who cares!
    • I'm sure he has left signs, or, he is looking down, laughing That's my cunning plan for when I leave, lots of half finished projects, with no rhyme or reason of where I was actually up to, just to keep everyone on their toes
×
×
  • Create New...