Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

FYI People

Just heard that channel 7 is at an accident scene ATM gathering footage of a red R33 that has taken out a stobie pole on Port Rd.

We're going to be completely F#*Ked if this doesn't stop for at least 6 months.

EDIT!!

Apparently it was a 32 not a 33

Edited by D_Stirls
FYI People

Just heard that channel 7 is at an accident scene ATM gathering footage of a red R33 that has taken out a stobie pole on Port Rd.

We're going to be completely F#*Ked if this doesn't stop for at least 6 months.

not watching the new atm, is it severe? or just injuries?

hope its not a speeding incident :P

ted180, I was prepared to overlook the fact that you were posting a banned members thoughts in a post.....up until the cheap shot.

So as Andrew said earlier about monitoring IP's, posting thru another member is no different......banned means banned!

You have therefore scored yourself a warning and you can thank Nisskid for that........for anyone else wishing to post banned members posts.....don't do it, otherwise what's the point of even giving someone time out?!

FYI People

Just heard that channel 7 is at an accident scene ATM gathering footage of a red R33 that has taken out a stobie pole on Port Rd.

We're going to be completely F#*Ked if this doesn't stop for at least 6 months.

Hope they are okay and like Unit Zero said hope it wasnt a speeding incident.

A Skyline aint the only car which can take out a stobie though......

Edited by 93GTST
Hope they are okay and like Unit Zero said hope it wasnt a speeding incident.

A Skyline aint the only car which can take out a stobie though......

That's not the point though because you can bet your ass that isn't what the news will be saying tonight.

That's not the point though because you can bet your ass that isn't what the news will be saying tonight.

Yeah thats right, what you just said is what I meant. Maybe I should have used a different choice of words :P

EDIT -

Your post was fine up until that line.

I honestly don't see what was wrong with that, it was a genuine disclaimer, last time he posted about defects it was misinterpreted as a personal attack on sled, to remove any doubt he made sure it was known it had no subliminal value. It was either post it as is and risk another misinterpretation, extending the ban, or making it clear it wasn't a personal attack, seemed like the responsible thing to do.

Ultimately, you can't really expect to ban a member for a 100% innocent post that you misinterpreted, and not expect to leave a bitter taste in their mouth.

I honestly don't see what was wrong with that, it was a genuine disclaimer, last time he posted about defects it was misinterpreted as a personal attack on sled, to remove any doubt he made sure it was known it had no subliminal value. It was either post it as is and risk another misinterpretation, extending the ban, or making it clear it wasn't a personal attack, seemed like the responsible thing to do.

Ultimately, you can't really expect to ban a member for a 100% innocent post that you misinterpreted, and not expect to leave a bitter taste in their mouth.

Well I'm not getting into the nitty gritty of your beef, however for some reason you (nisskid) were banned - now if you don't like that, you can always appeal to the other mods of the board, I'm sure they will hear you out and decide for themselves if sled was being out of line. Or, sometimes its easier to just cop the holiday and let things pass naturally. It would have been a 100% innocent post but you mentioned his name - I take this as a baiting... there just simply wasn't any need for it.

And ted, you probably should have known better than to post for a temporarily banned member... but it seems like you only ever post negative comments these days so I doubt my words would mean anything to you at this stage.

-D

I don't give a rats about the content......DONT POST ON BEHALF OF BANNED MEMBERS!!
ted180, I was prepared to overlook the fact that you were posting a banned members thoughts in a post.....up until the cheap shot.

So what cheap shot were you referring to then?

Well I'm not getting into the nitty gritty of your beef, however for some reason you (nisskid) were banned - now if you don't like that, you can always appeal to the other mods of the board, I'm sure they will hear you out and decide for themselves if sled was being out of line. Or, sometimes its easier to just cop the holiday and let things pass naturally. It would have been a 100% innocent post but you mentioned his name - I take this as a baiting... there just simply wasn't any need for it.

And ted, you probably should have known better than to post for a temporarily banned member... but it seems like you only ever post negative comments these days so I doubt my words would mean anything to you at this stage.

-D

The 100% innocent comment that he was banned for never mentioned his name, it had nothing to do with SLED. This is the post that he was banned for:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=4511506

He was banned on the grounds that Sled thought the post was subliminally directed at him as a mod.

You be the judge.

The 100% innocent comment that he was banned for never mentioned his name, it had nothing to do with SLED. This is the post that he was banned for:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=4511506

He was banned on the grounds that Sled thought the post was subliminally directed at him as a mod.

You be the judge.

Actually he was banned for the posts leading up to post #57 (on page 3) as well I suspect some PM arguments that were previously alluded to.. it just so happens that sled didnt respond to it until you'd already posted again, an estimated duration of 6 hours difference. like I said, I'm not going to get into whether or not either one of you are right, simply because I just don't care. However if you have an axe to grind against any single mod, speak to the rest of the mods and make an official complaint. Fighting in public is undignified.

-D

and there we go the opening story on Channel 7, i only saw the last 15 seconds though but they were questioning the power and availability of the performance import vehicles dues to their low cost. They claimed than Vinh's WRX only cost $11,000.

Well done Nene.. This looks like a step in the right direction :P

Tho Neils comments seem broad and normal but him making the contact is atleast nice..

Has Neil helped out on any cruises yet that SAU has organised?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You have the option to do this. Nobody but me ever did this (go slower, I mean) Everyone seems to fall victim to "This would be a great setup for you, but for me, I need a little more power..."
    • Save yourself the headache of an alarm. Immobilizer on the signal side of the main EFI relays so it won't start is good enough. DIY killswitch is the same thing except instead of a nice passive system you need to remember to switch it on and off.
    • Yeah, the advent of canbus was supposed to cut down on wiring weight, then some bright marketing wonk says "oh, look at all these wonderful tech gadgets we can cram in here now that we have this wonderous technology" and some arsehole safety legislator says "oh, look at all the wonderful surveillance and tracking gadgets we can cram in here now that we have this wonderous technology" and some dipshit young engineer who has grown up thinking that an extra 500000 lines of code is not a problem because storage is cheap these days says "oh look at all this wonderful shit I can do to one up those dipshit arsholes over at VW" and the Karens of the world all go "oh look at all these fancy things I can do on my screen (so long as I am not driving on a bumpy road wherein touch screens immediately become the single most stupid shit idea ever shoveled into a car) and my 19 zone airconditioning keeps my sweaty fat folds a bit less damp and the windows close themselves because I'm too fat and lazy to wind them up for myself and these reversing sensors would have been great if I'd paid attention to them instead of smashing them on the bollard while I was reversing and staring fixedly forward that day I went to pick up little Charlize from ballet" and the sweaty mongoloids who say "oh this wonderful collision avoidance technology with these 45 excellent radar antennae scattered across the front of my car mean I can tailgate like a methed up tradie at full speed with no fear because the car and the 35 airbags will protect me if it all goes wrong" ...... </shallistopranting?>
    • There's a post from a member (can't recall who), went down the path of a twin scroll G30-660 and it's doing over 300kW+ AND comes on about the same as a high flow RB25DET turbo. Have your cake and eat it too in this case. TBH, if I had a 2nd chance of building my car again (i.e. someone gave me what I wanted for my shit box, but the deal was I had to re-build another R33 and keep the change) I would just pop in a stock NEO motor (with new seals, rod bearings, ARP studs, head gasket, sump, Nitto pump), get a smaller twin scroll turbo, modify the stock low mount (keep the divider in place), and make a solid 300kW on 98RON and call it a day. 
    • It's all the sound deadening, and extra shit piled into them, plus all the extra (even though it's thinner) material for crumple zones. I can't fathom in modern cars why they need canbus to the headlights, and why the headlights must be vin coded on some cars to the ECU, BCM, and security module! Especially when they claim it's for security, yet, the canbus at the headlights let's thieves steal the car in minutes, so even more cars are being stolen! The Mercedes Sprinter 907 vans. They're a huge van, but a "basic" van. Yet they have that many canbus networks, plus two Lin networks, AND an Ethernet network. Logging a single network alone of 8 byte data frames, and they will generate a 20mb log file in 5 minutes. That's one network, and I can't remember the exact amount, but there's over 10 full CAN2.0B networks in them. I'm not a fan of modern cars, oddly, more and more I hate DBW, and all the bullshittery the cars try and interfere with. But all that bullshittery adds weight, plus crazy regulations on crumple zones, plus, ever picked a modern seat up, half of them have like 4 electric motors in them and will weigh 30+kg each. Then all the motors for things like adjustable steering columns blah blah blah. And did I mention the sound deadening so you can even hear an ambulance right behind you even if you 7.2surround sound is off?
×
×
  • Create New...