Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 615
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

merlin, 1 piece of advice from my experience. the cusco arms are good but the ikeya arms are miles better when talking lower control arms. they are in a whole new league when it comes to LCA's.

the ikeya front lower control arms are a serious piece of gear. much different design and incorporate the castor rod with a better mounting and much beefier all round. the rear lower control arms are great too.

tops are much of a muchness, but definitely go ikeya for both front and rear LCA's. you wont regret it.

the suspension and brakes both will be awesome.

but I would avoid the pedal box unless you really need it, or at least go for hanging pedals instead. they are more trouble than they are worth in a skyline. have a look at mark and russ, they ran one in the 32 and have found the same as I have in that they take some getting used too and with the way the driving position is in a sedan floor mounted pedals can be hard to use. looking at lots of the serious cars in japan the quick guys were not running them, and many guys that were running them were struggling. consequently when doing the R34 which is no holes barred mark chose NOT to run a pedal box this time.

I would also not do the hydraulic handbrake unless you really need/want it. the stock handbrake is quite good, and chuck in some endless handbrake shoes and a pair of new handbrake cables (not expensive) and it will be toit as a toiger.

oh, and swaybars. don't do the whiteline thing. go cusco. much nicer fit, and they are hollow which makes them much, much lighter. pick up a whiteline bar, that should make up your mind! or if the ARC ones are better again. but the cusco ones are reasonable money, the ARC ones are $$$.

oh, do the ikeya tie rod ends too. they are good and not too expensive.

Retail pricing was $2300.00...

You should be able to get it for under $2000.

Can I ask what the g-sensor is actually hooked up to. I cam across it in when stripping my GTR but im not sure what part of the car and why it monitors it.

Beer Bitch: I haven't bought LCAs yet... only the uppers. PM me a price for the front and rear LCAs... I can't find anyone who sells the FRONT Ikeya LCAs, only the rear seem to be available.

Cusco swaybars aren't adjustable, which turned me off them.

JiN_MaN: The G-sensor sits just behind the handbrake, and is wired into the ATESSA computer and ABS... Mainly, it's used by ATESSA to determine when to transfer torque to the front wheels. Without this stupidly expensive part (or if it is busted like my old one), a GTR is effectively a RWD.

Geez, Im surprised you could understand my question it was that miss worded.

Cheers for the response.

Actually now that I think about it my 4wd and ABS light are on, Ive only just got it running last night so havent had time to look into the problem. I assume this is a relatively common problem for the g-sensor to let go?

Beer Bitch: I haven't bought LCAs yet... only the uppers. PM me a price for the front and rear LCAs... I can't find anyone who sells the FRONT Ikeya LCAs, only the rear seem to be available.

Cusco swaybars aren't adjustable, which turned me off them.

JiN_MaN: The G-sensor sits just behind the handbrake, and is wired into the ATESSA computer and ABS... Mainly, it's used by ATESSA to determine when to transfer torque to the front wheels. Without this stupidly expensive part (or if it is busted like my old one), a GTR is effectively a RWD.

If you haven't bought LCA's then have a think about the Nismo LCA plus upper link bracket plus castor rod kit. Bin the castor rod but the other two bits are worth having. As ever with Nismo they are standard Nissan bits just with the holes drilled in different locations. The LCA gives about +5mm per side and the upper bracket moves the locating bolt holes to twist the upper arm & hence reduce the tendency to bind with more castor added. Just understand that you need to remove the ABS etc to get at the damn things.

As for Cusco sway bars - big tick. The rear is slightly stifer than the Whiteline gear (20%?) & the front is alot stiffer. I haven't found any adjustable Cusco ones for the R32 but there are a few references to them & they may exist. You may not need both ends adjustable anyway. I set my front Whiteline to soft & the rear to hard. Never moved either of them off those settings. Replaced the rear with a Cusco & felt happy about the near on 4kg savings.....

Jin Man: Nope, not really a common problem... But all it takes is for a careless workshop apprentice to hit something against it, or whatever, and it'll stop working.

It's normally well protected under the centre console/armrest area, surrounded by plastic bits, so it's not easy to get direct impact against the g-sensor... Only in stripped out cars, where they're exposed, will you risk damaging it.

djr: thanks heaps for that feedback mate, I'll take it into consideration.

oh, and swaybars. don't do the whiteline thing. go cusco. much nicer fit, and they are hollow which makes them much, much lighter. pick up a whiteline bar, that should make up your mind! or if the ARC ones are better again. but the cusco ones are reasonable money, the ARC ones are $$$.

oh, do the ikeya tie rod ends too. they are good and not too expensive.

Those weight savings are really nice but given the whiteline/roadholder/selby/redranger swaybars are solid they are probably a lot stiffer than the hollow cusco's.

Are the cusco's thicker than the whiteline's to counter the reduction in rigidity due to it being hollow?

+ For the Arc bars :P i was lucky enough to get them on my car from japan

I was looking at Lcs's the other day the nismo setup looks nice but not as adjustable as the Ikeya which could quiet possibly be overkill???

Those weight savings are really nice but given the whiteline/roadholder/selby/redranger swaybars are solid they are probably a lot stiffer than the hollow cusco's.

Are the cusco's thicker than the whiteline's to counter the reduction in rigidity due to it being hollow?

no the whiteline bars are NOT stiffer than the cusco ones even though they are solid and more than double the weight. the cusco ones are lighter, stiffer, better made, come with all the parts needed, and not very expensive. the whiteline ones are ill fitting, cheaply made, and don't always come with all the required bits. and they are damn heavy. simple as that. the only advantage the whiteline ones have is they are adjustable.

no the whiteline bars are NOT stiffer than the cusco ones even though they are solid and more than double the weight. the cusco ones are lighter, stiffer, better made, come with all the parts needed, and not very expensive. the whiteline ones are ill fitting, cheaply made, and don't always come with all the required bits. and they are damn heavy. simple as that. the only advantage the whiteline ones have is they are adjustable.

Solid case for Cusco over Whiteline right there.

I wasn't overly impressed with the Whiteline bars I had in the R33 either.

Sorry to go a little bit off topic here, but since were on the topic of sway bars, wheres the best place to look for the Cusco ones? and are they much more expensive than the whiteline ones?

Also Merli, are you going to run a bias adjuster for the brakes, I saw you wrote you were thinking about a bias bar later on, Willwood make a proportioning valve that you could use on the rear brakes as an intrim.

Sorry to go a little bit off topic here, but since were on the topic of sway bars, wheres the best place to look for the Cusco ones? and are they much more expensive than the whiteline ones?

Also Merli, are you going to run a bias adjuster for the brakes, I saw you wrote you were thinking about a bias bar later on, Willwood make a proportioning valve that you could use on the rear brakes as an intrim.

Slide is a forum sponsor, and is able to get you any Cusco parts you require.... Alternatively, Beer Baron seems to have some hookups too :P

I have a Tilton lever-style bias adjuster that will be installed in-cabin... There should be a photo of it a few pages back. That only gives you fine tuning bias adjustment though. As I said, I think I'll be massively rear biased, so I might need to go for dual master cylinders and balance bar (the best way to set brake bias adjustment) or a pedal box.

Slide is a forum sponsor, and is able to get you any Cusco parts you require.... Alternatively, Beer Baron seems to trade on here too :O

I have a Tilton lever-style bias adjuster that will be installed in-cabin... There should be a photo of it a few pages back. That only gives you fine tuning bias adjustment though. As I said, I think I'll be massively rear biased, so I might need to go for dual master cylinders and balance bar (the best way to set brake bias adjustment) or a pedal box.

fixed...lol

no the whiteline bars are NOT stiffer than the cusco ones even though they are solid and more than double the weight. the cusco ones are lighter, stiffer, better made, come with all the parts needed, and not very expensive. the whiteline ones are ill fitting, cheaply made, and don't always come with all the required bits. and they are damn heavy. simple as that. the only advantage the whiteline ones have is they are adjustable.

A sway bar is simply a torsional spring. The larger the radius of the bar the stiffer it is. It is actually a fourth order relationship. Hence the steel at the centre of the Whiteline bar does next to no work but just adds weight.

This is why you use tube instead of rod for torsional anything (Springs, structures whatever).

I bought my Cusco bits from Greenline. Try them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Because all parts that are put into your papers usually are assigned a badging if they did not come with one. So other people can just check that badging to tell if it is the parts your papes outline. But my pipe has NOTHING on it whatsoever. No idea why this even passed as a Mines pipe to begin with. I see this going two ways: -nobody cares and it's a non-issue, but that is unlikely -the pipe will just have to be assigned a bagding, for sake of argument, a Mines logo, and the papers corrected accordingly If it interests you I will post what the actual solution ended up being. All I care about is that it has to sound equal length and nobody can screw me later on because of a pipe being illegal.
    • The fasteners to the pipe are not subject to TÜV I guess, if we really start putting nuts and bolts through technical tests I'm going to hang the people responsible and then myself. Usually on a modern-ish EU normed car, you would just replace the pipe. Because if you start hacking away at it and welding new pieces on the cops will definitely find a reason to tow your car. That is just how it is sadly. On old cars and imports with no clear "standard" stuff like that won't matter too much. Most cops or inspectors probably won't even really know what they are looking at. But there is experts for this stuff even among cops, and some of them know the rules to a T and even have extensive knowledge about many vehicles. For "just a pipe" to be legal it usually is included in a set of parts, like a complete intake kit or a full exhaust. For example my exhaust needs to pass a noise test, meaning they have a standardized test track with a set of instructions and they run the car through there 3x for an average noise value that is 75dB(a) at point x of the test track. If it's above that, fail. For a turbo setup to be put in your papers you have to do dyno runs, emissions testing etc. So quite costly
    • Would this not be the same for the exhaust you've posted up?  If your exhaust volume and emissions are fine, why does the brand of pipe matter? 
    • The issue is more the fact that there is inspectors that deal with japanese cars a lot and they might know what a real Mines pipe looks like. And then they're gonna get antsy and not pass your car. But I'd have to talk to one of them about this, because you know as well as me that it's just a damn pipe and it effectively doesn't do anything. As I need to have my GT2860s and my exhaust setup (and the increase in HP) TÜV'd anyways maybe they can just correct the entry in the papers or assign a badge to the front pipe. I'm no expert either though, will inquire about this.     Thanks for the insight. Not sure if having a custom made pipe is good or not. Will find out in due time I suppose. Would be kind of funny if this was made in Germany though.
    • See this is a really tricky topic as technically the same rules apply to all cars but for cars but there is a difference. If you want to modify a car like the Skyline which never existed here you have a bit more freedom as they do not adhere to EU specs anyway. Any modification you do has to be in dividually checked anyway so as long as one of the inspectors think it's ok and within the TÜV ruleset you can get stuff like a top secret rear diffuser put in your papers. Which frankly would need a shitload of tests and certificates for EU spec cars, like a 2010 BMW M3 for example. But if you DO run these tests and all tests come out ok (safety stuff for the most part) there is no problem running such a part legally. It's just way too expensive to do for a single person on one car. The most touchy parts are emissions related mods, like an exhaust, turbos, air intakes. If it makes noise or alters the carbon emissions it's essentially illegal until you prove it's not. Meaning it doesn't exceed noise limits or have worse carbon emissions. I'd say for hoses if you replace them same same it doesn't matter what material they are or what brand you use. Same for nuts and bolts usually, they won't go and specifically check that your water hoses and some bolts are 100% OEM parts, that is nonsense.
×
×
  • Create New...