Jump to content
SAU Community

Removing Of Power Fc

agsryd

By agsryd,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

R31Nismoid Grand Master

R31Nismoid

Posted
Posted

Well, not on a stock turbo you dont have 213rwkw... but thats another story...

You will loose a bit of power, but more so economy/driveability. It will just be fairly rich.

You should also back the boost off to under 10psi if you intend to use the right pedal as its likely you'll hit R&R mode on the stock ECU over 10psi.

paulr33 Grand Master

paulr33

Posted
Posted

you will loose respose, power, economy and the car will feel sluggish

just baby it around with the stock ecu and youll be fine

dont trash the pants off and avoid loading it up on boost with stock ecu

  • 1 month later...
R31Nismoid Grand Master

R31Nismoid

Posted
Posted
By that did you mean its not possible or something else? Because i too made 208kw from stock turbo. Just wondering what you exactly meant sorry.

190-200rwkw is all a stocker will make - legitimately.

Some times you see results of 220rwkw etc, its just not possible on a factory huffer.

The owners take em to the 1/4 mile and should run 110mph with 220rwkw... but alas, they only ever run ~106mph indicating a much more accurate/true 200rwkw in a R33 :D

Its funny, 200rwkw has been the max for years, yet the past 18-24months people have slowly been making more and more with the same turbo... gotta ask yourself how its even possible :)

adis Experienced

adis

Posted
Posted
190-200rwkw is all a stocker will make - legitimately.

Some times you see results of 220rwkw etc, its just not possible on a factory huffer.

The owners take em to the 1/4 mile and should run 110mph with 220rwkw... but alas, they only ever run ~106mph indicating a much more accurate/true 200rwkw in a R33 :D

Its funny, 200rwkw has been the max for years, yet the past 18-24months people have slowly been making more and more with the same turbo... gotta ask yourself how its even possible :huh:

Well maybe the dynos are not correct and need to be re-calibrated or something, because i done a run on my stockie and got 208 on 12psi. could have maybe got 210+ on 15psi? So im not lying, maybe the dyno is? I don't know. Either way, my dyno results are here:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...0&start=500

R31Nismoid Grand Master

R31Nismoid

Posted
Posted

Honestly i dont care what the dyno says.

Its clear with a ambient of 19, and a IT of 31 - the sensor is near some heat, hence it 'gives' more power via correction, doesn't mean its legit

I could make a 300rwkw car ready 400rwkw on a dyno... not hard

femno Grand Master

femno

Posted
Posted

Not on new dynos you cant.

The new DD has its own electronic weatherstation where you cannot input different atmospheric conditions to tweak the correction and therefore power figures.

So do mainlines.

This argument is growing old Ash!

Oh, btw, mates 32 w RB25 S2 made 201 with airbox, std ECU and exhaust 10psi on a 2009 DD. I dont see why 213 couldnt be had.

Cjmartz2k Proficient

Cjmartz2k

Posted
Posted
So how would you get a 300kw car to read 400kw then?

(just curious)

Atmospheric correction factor. Tell the dyno the air pressure is 28.83 and the air temp is 110 degrees.

Personally I find Mainline dyno's to be most accurate.

Define "most accurate". Do you mean lowest reading?

adis Experienced

adis

Posted
Posted

Fair enough but i don't see how my car didn't pump out real 208KW. Was 19 degrees, so what, cold day. Normal dyno, normal mode(not shoot out etc), made 208. FULL STOP. You don't believe it bad luck, i believe you can get 210 with quality mods from a stockie. And like i already said, that was on 12 psi, i can run 15 i think, even tho i never tried.

R31Nismoid Grand Master

R31Nismoid

Posted
Posted
Fair enough but i don't see how my car didn't pump out real 208KW. Was 19 degrees, so what, cold day. Normal dyno, normal mode(not shoot out etc), made 208. FULL STOP. You don't believe it bad luck, i believe you can get 210 with quality mods from a stockie. And like i already said, that was on 12 psi, i can run 15 i think, even tho i never tried.

Take it to the track then and run ~108mph - if you don't, you will then see how it didn't make it because you cannot argue that.

My bet is it'll run closer to ~105mph as opposed to 108 (which with 210rwkw you should run easily)

l0WRB Mentor

l0WRB

Posted
Posted (edited)

i have to agree with r31nismoid! but let them think they have 220rwkw, when they go thru the top end at only 103-105mph they will realise lol

but your car should run fine if u return it back to stock ecu.

whats with everyone saying u will loose drivabilty and fuel economy? lol my after market ecu is a pig 2 drive and drinks fuel like no tommorrow, what i would give for it to drive like it did on stock ecu.

Edited by l0WRB

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • defari
      What Music Are You Listening To?

      By defari · Posted

    • defari
      What Music Are You Listening To?

      By defari · Posted

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyZDvZmvhik
    • GTSBoy
      Car Rotisserie

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      You'd be better off digging a pit and standing under it to shoot it.
    • MBS206
      Troubleshooting - motor wont turn over

      By MBS206 · Posted

      The easiest way would to be ignore the oscilloscope, grab a multimeter, and make sure all the main connections are right. An oscilloscope will give 99.9% of even technicians so much grief, as they have no idea what things should even look like on an oscilloscope. Which is also even more likely for someone who's first ever major work on a car is this If the battery volts are dropping down so low, the LDV will reboot the ECU, when it does so, it will drop out the start circuit. If this is occuring, the battery voltage should also come back up. Give it a few tests, even simple ones like when you're attempting to crank it, measure voltage from the engine block, to the negative terminal. You might find you've got really bad connections somewhere. My guess is the "new" motor has something like a shit starter motor, at which point, you can swap the starter motor from the old motor, to the new motor. Before I did any of the above though, I'd 100% confirm the battery in the vehicle. Most jumper packs are absolutely useless, especially if a battery has a bad cell for example. Also the new modern "jump packs" if you don't know what you're doing with them, you won't even get them into high current stage. So go back to basics, check the battery, especially with a known good one as a replacement test. Check ALL the wiring, this includes where they're bolted onto the battery, and bolted onto the starter motor. Check all the earth straps are on. Measure your resistances across your earth straps. A good check here is to measure voltage across the earth straps while you're trying to crank it. If you're seeing voltage, you've got high resistance joints! Oh, and once you've done the above, check the battery over again.
    • MBS206
      Car Rotisserie

      By MBS206 · Posted

      For most rotisseries, as Duncan has mentioned, you really don't want a full car on it, you want a stripped shell. And imagine how many more weeks THAT is going to add to working on the car...
×
×
  • Create New...