Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I didn't mean to have it sound quite so personal.

I'm just over the holier-than-thou mentality of Prius fans who think their NiMH batteried, aluminium, cars are somehow going to save the planet because they happen to sip a little less fuel around town...and I guess it bubbles over sometimes. :(

Totally agree....

I just wanted to get the message across about decatting...

"If you want performance, go buy a turbocharged car"....don't opt to decat....

Let me tell you... you can have a roadside EPA test... Noise as well.

Get down the GO Road every so often and watch.

As for NO CAT, why bother?

You will not notice much difference in power

Unless you have yearly emissions tests how would you know if one is still performing well either.

Sorry Scathing... not trying to be rude... but how exactly are big wheels bad for handling and fuel efficiency? Bigger wheels (unless too big) will nearly always increase handling!

IMO... a lot of Modifications to a Skyline (including engine stuff), if done correctly can actually decrease the level of Enviromental Pollution whilst adding to the performance enjoyment.

How often is a Skyline running really, really rich?

While a early 90's Falcodore may not be as fuel efficient as a V35 in itself, when you tally up the total fuel use with the ocean freighter that brought your Skyline here then the scales tip in favour of the local product.

that's really rich coming from someone who lists Z33, SW20 and Swift Gti on his list of cars ;)

EDIT: In fact ignore my comment. I can see the validity of your arguement.

Edited by fcruz3r
Sorry Scathing... not trying to be rude... but how exactly are big wheels bad for handling and fuel efficiency? Bigger wheels (unless too big) will nearly always increase handling!

Big wheels are heavier. While replacing a cast 17" wheel with an 18" forged wheel might work out lighter, if you compare apples to apples and compare your forged 18" wheel with a forged 17" wheel (which will clear the same brakes as your stock cast wheels, and are therefore a valid choice) the 17" forged wheels are still lighter.

The extra mass increases unsprung weight, which is proportionally far worse for handling than sprung weight. Your forged 17" wheel will allow your suspension to perform better.

Bigger diameters shifts the mass further away from the rotational centre of the wheel. That increases rotational inertia. There's a performance hit in terms of acceleration and braking as a result. The extra energy required to spin them, due to that inertia, incurs a fuel economy hit. The extra energy required to slow them chews through pads faster, which means more heat is generated by your braking hardware, more brake pad dust is committed into the atmosphere, and your car consumes more pads (which need to be manufactured) over a given period than it did prior.

Wider wheels increase drag. There's an acceleration and fuel economy hit as a result.

Tyres generally have more of an effect on handling than the wheels. The main reason to go to a bigger wheel is to reduce sidewall flex, but a tyre with a reinforced sidewall and appropriate pressure get around that issue. If you have a look at most top-tier race cars (SuperGT and F1 come to mind), their tyres have a fair amount of sidewall. For most racers, the rims end up being as small as possible while fitting over the brakes.

IMO... a lot of Modifications to a Skyline (including engine stuff), if done correctly can actually decrease the level of Enviromental Pollution whilst adding to the performance enjoyment.

In Europe, the cost for rego on cars is based on its emissions these days. If it was possible to increase performance and decrease emissions, while meeting their reliability targets, the OEMs would do it.

I'm pretty sure a lot of the performance / economy restrictors serve some other purpose. Cars for the European market tend to run a tad rich in the top end to preserve and cool the engine, especially if we're talking about long-distance high speed and high RPM situations. They do have to ensure the car runs in all kinds of weather conditions as well. I don't plan on driving my car to Alice Springs, so I'm less fussed about ensuring that the engine won't overheat in 50°C+ ambient temps. I don't mind my ECU running a little leaner, which has bumped up the water temp a few degrees as a result.

If you're willing to sacrifice drive-anywhere reliability for performance and emissions, that's fine...but should your car break down its inability to move then makes it slower than a pedestrian. The parts you've broken end up in landfill, which has an environmental impact.

On a NA car, most powertrain mods increase power only in the top end, where you have more combustion cycles per unit of time and therefore you use more fuel when taking advantage of it. On mods that sacrifice low end torque for top end power, it means you need to drive higher in the rev range even when commuting.

The parts you throw away also have an environmental impact. It comes back to that Prius issue I mentioned earlier. The OEM has fitted a certain part on your car. If you've had someone manufacture you another part, then that's something else that a miner has dug out of the ground. A factory somewhere has used energy, maybe coal-fired or nuclear, to create an exhaust. Someone else has burned fuel to transport it to your location.

Your stock item doesn't just convert the exhaust gases from transportation and manufacture back into petrol, deconstruct itself back into its raw material, bury both back into the ground, move all the dirt back in to its location, and then re-plant the prior oxygen-generating and climate-stabilising vegetation back on top.

As the person who buys the product, you are responsible for a fair amount of environmental pollution by requesting the creation of that second part. You should add the environmental impact from creating the perfectly functional first part you've discarded from the car you purchased to your tally.

that's really rich coming from someone who lists Z33, SW20 and Swift Gti on his list of cars :down:

The difference is that I wasn't claiming to give a crap about how my cars affect the environment. :P

I've got no issues with people decatting their weekender cars. As long as they're not sitting there in peak hour traffic breathing in, and forcing others to breathe in, the poisonous gases that come out of the exhaust I'm pretty indifferent. If your car gets used for daily driver purposes, leave your cats on and stop trying to kill people.

Removing the cats might not bring massive gains, but then hardly any NA mod does. Whether the mod is worth the risk (environmentally, medically, or legally) isn't that clear cut for me, and boils down to personal choice.

there are other factors that come to play other than unsprung weight. trick is to find bigger wheels where the bulk of the weight is towards the center of the hub

if you look at the formula for moment of inertia, both mass and perpendicular distance to the axis of rotation plays a vital role.

LOL.... most of us hardly see 1 track day a year so screw the physics.

I say just get the biggest legal wheels and build your engine with as much powah as your wallet can handle.

my personal opinion, try not to decat and waste unburnt fuel out the exhaust. If you must, then get a flame thrower and at least have something to show for it

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, thumbsup from me. The distant shot of the bay just looks same-same as before.
    • Dad had a court case drag out with them from 1998 to 2004. He was in a not at fault accident, NRMA were the ones who covered the other person. They tried to blame his neck injuries on the fact he'd had an injury in 1981 on his extreme lower back where he slipped a single disc right near the bottom. Had been all cleared from that injury for years. This accident destroyed his shoulder, and f**ked a heap of discs in his neck, and he still has major problems with it to this day. Sarah's sister while on her L plates had a small Suzuki Alto, she had stopped to give way to an ambulance, and someone changed lanes behind her because there lane was also slowing, and rear ended her at 80km/h. (She had been stopped for a few seconds already too!). Car was completely f**kED. NRMA sent the vehicle around to 3 different workshops as they kept claiming "We believe it can be repaired, and not written off, we just need to find the correct workshop". It took 3 months, and a lot of arguing before they'd concede and wrote it and paid out. About two years later her sister had a Lancer, someone pulled out of a stop sign without stopping (in an 80 zone). Her sister swerved, hit the front of the other persons car (Instead of dead t-boning the drivers door), which ramped her Lancer, and made it roll multiple times down the road. It hit every panel on the way through. Her sister had slid her self out of the car, and remembers the ambos walking to the accident (They'd been sitting at a set of lights just down the road and witnessed it) and they were saying "Well, this ones going to be a fatality, no way you can walk away from that". Well, she did. And then NRMA sent two assessors out to look at the car, both of which wrote it off. They tried to send another assessor out, except a HUGE uproar was raised, and they FINALLY paid it out. That was on a car, that had damage to EVERY panel, you could see from 100m away the whole car was also twisted, roof bowed etc. Nah, we'll try get out of needing to payout on a $10,000 car... Her sister ended up with major shoulder reconstructive surgery being required, and was permanently limited in her ability to do her job as a nurse after that, as she can't (And was told before surgery too this would be guaranteed to happen) regain full strength in that shoulder. However, there was no choice to not have it, as she could barely use her arm, which was her dominant one, and was in near constant major pain. (And she's the type of person that would try and walk off a broken leg!) NRMA did the biggest run around on the personal injury side too for about 18 months, even to the point of trying to put 100% blame of the accident on Sarah's sister, even though the other driver admitted she didn't look, and didn't stop, and was charged by the police. Sarah used to have a Barina insured with them. It was a policy setup, paid all 12 months in advance. At the end of the 12 months, Sarah was living with me, I reviewed the renewal, it clearly stated "If you do nothing, your policy will cease on XYZ date". We did nothing, as we moved her insurance in with all of mine and I was with Shannons. We find out 10 months later, NRMA decided, because he DAD had a car insurance policy at the same address as what Sarah's mailing address was (Garaged address had been changed), that they'd put Sarah's (What should have been non existent policy) onto her Dad's month to month charges on his credit card. We had to jump through hoops, to get a refund. They didn't care that we actually found the letter that said "If you do nothing, your policy will cease" they made us prove we had NON COMPULSORY insurance else where before they'd issue the refund, and after they agreed to the refund, it still took another 6 weeks and 3 more phone calls for them to actually process it. They also had two insurance claims from storm damage, and they were an absolute cluster to get resolved as well (one vehicle, one house). Some how, up until about 3 years ago, her parents were still loyal to NRMA too, and we were like "How the hell are you so loyal to staying with them, when other places are so much cheaper, and they've f**ked you over every time you've ever had to make a claim?"
    • I got the four AN10 fitting welded up to the cam covers and started up making the head to sump breather/drain lines. The front passenger side cover I used a 45 up top and a 90 at the bottom into the stock VCT head drain spot (3/4" BPST to AN10 adapter) thats unused on the RB25DET NEO with some speedflow flame shield to protect it from the manifolds heat.   back passenger side was a 90 up top with some flame shield and 45 at the sump end. The rear drivers is 45 at both ends   the front drivers fitting is capped off for now but ready to go if i want to try moving the breathers around. I was told by the fabricator to leave all the welds raw for now to make sure there are no pin hole leaks. A lot of cleaning up, re bundling looms and degreasing to go as well as final assembly on the cam cover baffles. The first real test will be 28th March at a Circuit event. added complexity and more spots for leaks but overall looks relatively neat imo
    • Yeah i think the dash needs to come out. To get the loom or maybe just climate control and radio cluster. My mirrors are done i think the motors don’t work so well after flood haha i need the ac fan, you said you wanted to keep it for your 31 and interior loom not including boot. The wiper motor. I’m not sure how good the window surrounds are on the exterior on the pintara.  I will message you to get your bank details shortly 
    • Just another barrier put up to stop cars being modified. When we're all driving Chinese sewing machines, you won't want to modify it anyway, and you'll likely already have slashed your wrists and be locked up in a padded room for your own protection.
×
×
  • Create New...