Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Now more than ever, we need to buy Australian made/owned... So it would be awesome to see a write up on these local products if anyone has them in an RBDET, see if we can stimulate the local economy with the handouts!(and save some money)

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

marko, better off not to go too big on camshafts if you are running -10's, otherwise you will make it abit of a lag monster... keep them suttle and not 2 big, look at the group a aussie gtr's, they had medium sized cams and produced 600+ brake with a rev limit of 7000rpm. the porting is the most important in making power...

by the way, your setup will piss in 400rwkw.... u stress 2 much

not correct...we put bigger cams in one engine along with a few other tricks and it came on 1000rpm earlier. A few other notable engine builders who have done lots of R&D have noticed the same.

my old HKS GT-RS fed engine did the same...went from small cams and mild porting to big suckers and big port job and the thing was mega responsive and made stacks of power...it had a flat line of torque for 5000rpm...looked like a V8's curve on the dyno and left Jim at CRD wondering if the dyno was playing up...lol

Warlord.. if you want 272's don't mess around with the hydraulic convert it to solid (there's a bloke that converts the std lifters to solid) and then upsize that turbo as 272's will be a waste.

hydraulic 260-265's will see that 3037 max out easily on pump fuel with around 1 bar.

Dirt is sharing his experience with the 26. Not the 25 hydraulic crap where big duration != better.

marko how about

//www.kelford.co.nz/

yes...yes

im even thinking of getting 272 in and outs

Camtech uses Kelford billets for the RB's anyway but grind them here. I've used 3 sets of Camtech cams in the last month and they are top quality. Your stimulus money will easily cover a pair and you don't need to worry about getting slugged with import duty/gst on top of what you pay for them before they leave NZ.

Performance Springs valve springs are excellent, no need to look any further.

Warlord.. if you want 272's don't mess around with the hydraulic convert it to solid (there's a bloke that converts the std lifters to solid) and then upsize that turbo as 272's will be a waste.

hydraulic 260-265's will see that 3037 max out easily on pump fuel with around 1 bar.

Dirt is sharing his experience with the 26. Not the 25 hydraulic crap where big duration != better.

what r u going on about.

as for duty tax gst and all of that i would not worry to much about it as marko would know the amount of stuff i have got from o/s and not had to pay a thing,its more bad luck if you do as ive been told by a number of people on sau and off.

Edited by WARLORD
what r u going on about.

as for duty tax gst and all of that i would not worry to much about it as marko would know the amount of stuff i have got from o/s and not had to pay a thing,its more bad luck if you do as ive been told by a number of people on sau and off.

LOL Thanks for your sheer rudeness buddy. :banana:

If you take ones advice and don't do further research thats your sheer stupidity.

With regards to what I am on about.. Its not to hard to work out. But then again......

im even thinking of getting 272 in and outs

and then... your sig..

HKS turbo kit 3037 pro s

If you don't plan on running the 272's with a hydraulic head (why don't the japs like such cams?) or with the 3037 just state your plans are bigger and better. No need to sprout off some wanker comment.

Obviously the duty tax comment was not directed at myself.

Edited by TheRogue

i have imported parts over the yrs from japan and luckily & i havent been hit for additional costs...i hope im not speaking too soon though as i am waiting on 2.5k worth of goods to arrival from nz :unsure::unsure::unsure:

LOL Thanks for your sheer rudeness buddy. :unsure:

If you take ones advice and don't do further research thats your sheer stupidity.

With regards to what I am on about.. Its not to hard to work out. But then again......

and then... your sig..

If you don't plan on running the 272's with a hydraulic head (why don't the japs like such cams?) or with the 3037 just state your plans are bigger and better. No need to sprout off some wanker comment.

Obviously the duty tax comment was not directed at myself.

yer your right your a big dickhead. once again a keyboard hero !!!!

"3037 max out at 1 bar" you have know idea what you are on about

do me a big favour keep your highly unimportant crap to your self when it comes to talking to me cos i dont give a shit.

now just let marko continue with is thread with out the petty crap you have started. ""Dirt is sharing his experience with the 26. Not the 25 hydraulic crap where big duration != better."""

my comment was to my friend marko and what paul is sharing had nothing to do with my comment ,you blowfly

sorry mate but im sick and tired of people who jump on sau after being a member for short periods and have no respect and talk shit to members because they own a computer.

Edited by WARLORD
yer your right your a big dickhead. once again a keyboard hero !!!!

"3037 max out at 1 bar" you have know idea what you are on about

do me a big favour keep your highly unimportant crap to your self when it comes to talking to me cos i dont give a shit.

now just let marko continue with is thread with out the petty crap you have started. ""Dirt is sharing his experience with the 26. Not the 25 hydraulic crap where big duration != better."""

my comment was to my friend marko and what paul is sharing had nothing to do with my comment ,you blowfly

sorry mate but im sick and tired of people who jump on sau after being a member for short periods and have no respect and talk shit to members because they own a computer.

LMFAO.

Improve airflow and the 3037 WILL max out around 1bar. Boost is a restriction to airflow. knobber.

I have fiddled with these turbo's on 25's and 30's. Also check Al's RB30det... Go check the dyno thread buddy.

How is my dirt comment Petty? You have way misinterpreted... I simply stated that incase one (i.e you) with the RB25 thought it would be fine to run big duration cams in their hydraulic head. It doesn't work. Been there done that.

Mate I've been here on sau since it started so dont look at post counts buddy, prior to that it was SDU.

Your sick of it.... I gave some advice that is correct and you provided me with a highly intelligent wanker comment.

Edited by TheRogue
LMFAO.

idiot... improve airflow and the 3037 WILL max out around 1bar. Boost is a restriction to airflow.

I have experienced it as well as Al's RB30det... Go check the dyno thread buddy.

Mate i've been here on sau since it started so dont look at post counts buddy.

so you have two or more user id"s so you can write shit when you feel like it cos it states you have been a member from 3/12/08 you lier.

see your talking shit again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...