Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

R32

GTST RB20DET 2ltr,6 cyl,dohc,turbo 160kw@6400rpm 2634Nm@3200rpm 1998 RWD M/A

GTS4 RB20DET 2ltr,6 cyl,dohc,turbo 160kw@6400rpm 263Nm@3200rpm 1998 4WD M/A

R34

GTS RB20DE 2ltr, 6 cyl, dohc 116kw@6400rpm 184Nm@5200rpm 1998 RWD M/A

GTS RB25DE 2.5ltr, 6 cyl, dohc 142kw@6400rpm 231Nm@4800rpm 2498 RWD M/A

GTT RB25DET 2ltr,6 cyl,dohc,turbo 206kw@6400rpm 363Nm@3200rpm 1998 RWD M/A

thats the best i could find :banana:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/265088-quick-question/#findComment-4529009
Share on other sites

R32

GTST RB20DET 2ltr,6 cyl,dohc,turbo 160kw@6400rpm 2634Nm@3200rpm 1998 RWD M/A

GTS4 RB20DET 2ltr,6 cyl,dohc,turbo 160kw@6400rpm 263Nm@3200rpm 1998 4WD M/A

R34

GTS RB20DE 2ltr, 6 cyl, dohc 116kw@6400rpm 184Nm@5200rpm 1998 RWD M/A

GTS RB25DE 2.5ltr, 6 cyl, dohc 142kw@6400rpm 231Nm@4800rpm 2498 RWD M/A

GTT RB25DET 2ltr,6 cyl,dohc,turbo 206kw@6400rpm 363Nm@3200rpm 1998 RWD M/A

thats the best i could find :banana:

cheers ,mate

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/265088-quick-question/#findComment-4529021
Share on other sites

R32

GTST RB20DET 2ltr,6 cyl,dohc,turbo 160kw@6400rpm 2634Nm@3200rpm 1998 RWD M/A

GTS4 RB20DET 2ltr,6 cyl,dohc,turbo 160kw@6400rpm 263Nm@3200rpm 1998 4WD M/A

R34

GTS RB20DE 2ltr, 6 cyl, dohc 116kw@6400rpm 184Nm@5200rpm 1998 RWD M/A

GTS RB25DE 2.5ltr, 6 cyl, dohc 142kw@6400rpm 231Nm@4800rpm 2498 RWD M/A

GTT RB25DET 2ltr,6 cyl,dohc,turbo 206kw@6400rpm 363Nm@3200rpm 1998 RWD M/A

thats the best i could find :banana:

Nice buddy!

R32 Wins hands down.

+ if you got the GTS4 you could give it a bit of a launch and gain the head start.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/265088-quick-question/#findComment-4529041
Share on other sites

Nice buddy!

R32 Wins hands down.

+ if you got the GTS4 you could give it a bit of a launch and gain the head start.

it really depends....

the Turbo would be alot more fun to drive...

the non-turbo will get boring after a while.

but then again, R34 is alot more modern and newer.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/265088-quick-question/#findComment-4529065
Share on other sites

it really depends....

the Turbo would be alot more fun to drive...

the non-turbo will get boring after a while.

but then again, R34 is alot more modern and newer.

Yeah more modern and newer for sure, as the engine in the R34 would be revised and refined.

Performance wise... In this case the R32 FTW!

BTW we are talking GTS-T / GTS4 vs GT... Not GTR.

LOL!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/265088-quick-question/#findComment-4529072
Share on other sites

Yeah more modern and newer for sure, as the engine in the R34 would be revised and refined.

Performance wise... In this case the R32 FTW!

BTW we are talking GTS-T / GTS4 vs GT... Not GTR.

LOL!

engine in the r32 is out of a fairlady,(red top rb20det) rwd mine is rb25de neo (rwd),would a better ratio in my diff increase my chance of winning? both our cars have same sort of mods,what can i do to guarentee a win without turbo? my car is tiptronic so i dont have to worry about shift times,

was going to get a shift kit cold air intake and cams,im also picking up a 4" mandrel bent exhuast :banana: to big i know but its right price right time sorta thing.

what else can i do that will be relativly cheap and not to noticable (visualy)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/265088-quick-question/#findComment-4529108
Share on other sites

Yeah more modern and newer for sure, as the engine in the R34 would be revised and refined.

Performance wise... In this case the R32 FTW!

BTW we are talking GTS-T / GTS4 vs GT... Not GTR.

LOL!

yes i know were talking about GT R34 Vs GTS-T R32.

my point is, you must admit...thats a big hike in age difference there.

performance wise, yes the Turbo would have alot more potential and pleasure to drive.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/265088-quick-question/#findComment-4529227
Share on other sites

engine in the r32 is out of a fairlady,(red top rb20det) rwd mine is rb25de neo (rwd),would a better ratio in my diff increase my chance of winning? both our cars have same sort of mods,what can i do to guarentee a win without turbo? my car is tiptronic so i dont have to worry about shift times,

was going to get a shift kit cold air intake and cams,im also picking up a 4" mandrel bent exhuast :P to big i know but its right price right time sorta thing.

what else can i do that will be relativly cheap and not to noticable (visualy)

Fairlady? ... I have only hear of an old school (Datsun) Z car as Fairlady's... Can you explain more?

Diff ratio... Might give you a bit better pick up of the starting line... An upgrade to a light weighted Flywheel will help with acceleration as well.

Tuning up your cams and the high flow air intake will help a lot as that's the heart of where your power is coming from.

ECU upgrade will help with your Air/Fuel mixture.

4" exhaust?!

2.25" will do you fine, BUT you can have what ever size exhaust as long as you tune your car properly with that exhaust on it.

i could run faster than that thing

LMFAO!

yes i know were talking about GT R34 Vs GTS-T R32.

my point is, you must admit...thats a big hike in age difference there.

performance wise, yes the Turbo would have alot more potential and pleasure to drive.

Yes true, this is a age difference for sure.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/265088-quick-question/#findComment-4529329
Share on other sites

Fairlady? ... I have only hear of an old school (Datsun) Z car as Fairlady's... Can you explain more?

Diff ratio... Might give you a bit better pick up of the starting line... An upgrade to a light weighted Flywheel will help with acceleration as well.

Tuning up your cams and the high flow air intake will help a lot as that's the heart of where your power is coming from.

ECU upgrade will help with your Air/Fuel mixture.

4" exhaust?!

2.25" will do you fine, BUT you can have what ever size exhaust as long as you tune your car properly with that exhaust on it.

LMFAO!

Yes true, this is a age difference for sure.

ok thanks mate ill get on it,iv got full uras kit ill lower the car more for the race and remove any extra weight i can...how much $$$ should i expect to spend to outrun a turbo?,i know i have him at top end speed but i need the take of aswell,my car as it is beats supras on high and low end,and turbo subaru's can not pull away from me so im happy with that.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/265088-quick-question/#findComment-4529480
Share on other sites

Reeks of sweaty palms in here,

You're probably going to go backwards with a 4" exhaust, you're car needs the correct back pressure to operate at it's best. I doubt a 4' system will provide that on a 2.5 n/a, you could choke it down with some mufflers, but that defeats the point. A tuned set of headers and matching system would be my choice.

I doubt you'll get near a turbo's performance with any form of bolt on mods (nos excluded) Headwork, bigger valves, port and polish, cams, bigger injectors, engine management, bore, stroke or a 3ltr bottom end and a balance would be a good stating point if your genuine. Expensive exercise, then your turbo mate only has to bolt on a bigger snail and it's bye-bye again.

Seriously, love your car for what it is...the rest is a waste of $$$$$ for a small ego stroke.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/265088-quick-question/#findComment-4529533
Share on other sites

GTT RB25DET 2ltr,6 cyl,dohc,turbo 206kw@6400rpm 363Nm@3200rpm 1998 RWD M/A

Is that meant to be DETT ? I thought the GTR was the only one with 206 Kw?

no, the NEO RB25DET for R34 was also 206kw but lower Torque power than GT-R & if you put them both in either Straight line or track...the GTR would smash it

Think about it. The RB26 was 208KW 10 years before that engine, the rb25 was 180ish. In 10 years the rb25 goes up by 20KW, so i'd imagine that the r34 RB25 puts out more than the 208KW that they advertise.

well thats probably highly unlikely

because 206kw is what they call "Gentlemen's agreement", restricting it to 206kw... same as the EVO and STIs at the same time. (and mind you they are only 4 cylinders creating that much power)

The supra TT was tested on the Dyno in stock form... from memory it was advertised as 206kw but on paper showed up at around 238KW - 240kw. so i dont think the R34 GT-T would put out more power than the supra.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/265088-quick-question/#findComment-4530013
Share on other sites

well thats probably highly unlikely

because 206kw is what they call "Gentlemen's agreement", restricting it to 206kw... same as the EVO and STIs at the same time. (and mind you they are only 4 cylinders creating that much power)

EVO's and STI's run rather high boost though.

Oh, that's true. but what i'm saying is, if they got a 10-15% performance increase on the RB25, they'd probably have something similar with the RB26 (they had bigger turbo's in r34 gtr's didn't they?)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/265088-quick-question/#findComment-4530088
Share on other sites

Oh, that's true. but what i'm saying is, if they got a 10-15% performance increase on the RB25, they'd probably have something similar with the RB26 (they had bigger turbo's in r34 gtr's didn't they?)

well the torque is different.... and Torque makes a big difference in a cars speed & acceleration.

Not really... The RB25DET actually uses the LARGEST Japanese OEM turbos you could buy.

It is a T3 style turbocharger...If you measure it, it is actually somewhat...bigger/larger than that of T28 Turbochargers in the RB26DETT.

yes the GT-T can be tuned to exceed stock GT-Rs power. the biggest advantage of the GT-T over the GT-R is being 150kg lighter.

But in the overal perfomance package on track, the GT-R is hard to match.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/265088-quick-question/#findComment-4530329
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You’re all still going on about track cars, he has said multiple times doesn’t intend to take it to the track,  just stick to what was said at the beginning and do the pump and ecu, it’ll get you enough for 230kw at the wheels and has enough poke to be fun for what you want it for 
    • All of that is absolutely true. At any time in the history of these turbos the lottery has always been that it could die at stock boost treated exactly as the factory intended, or it could die when pushed to 10, or 12, or 14, or 16 psi, after a short time, or a longer time, or it could last seemingly forever. You have the combination of all the possible statistical (probably) normal distributions of manufacturing tolerances and quality outcomes, on top of the statistical distributions of failure modes (which might be normal, but are probably biased, like Poisson distributions). You get the lucky turbo and you can beat on it for years. You get the really unlucky turbo and it will crap itself as it rolls out of the factory gate. And every possibility in between. But you can definitely still kill the lucky turbo. It's just that most people didn't try, once they knew they really shouldn't try.
    • Maybe I have Stockholm syndrome but working on an M2 isn't that hard. Getting parts cheaply and quickly is hard, but getting parts same day isn't necessarily hard if you're willing to pay way too much for it at local dealers. There's a lot going on, you need to have a build of ISTA on a laptop and the right cable, if you don't have the mindset of "do it exactly right or not at all" you will probably start seeing cascading failures. Skylines are a little more tolerant in that regard. The car doesn't potentially trash itself if you bought the wrong oil filter like a BMW would. Or trash the entire cylinder head and potentially spin a bearing because someone took the anti-drainback valve out of the plastic oil filter cap. An M2 will also do just fine on track, zero oil starvation concerns, factory brakes are great if you change the pads for a high temp compound + flush with track-ready fluid.
    • The "ideal/formula" that used to be touted was death of the turbo is going to be caused by a combination of 3 things. Heat Speed of turbo (boost level you're pushing) Time   Basically, you can get away with high heat and high boost for short periods. But start doing long hard pulls, or circuit driving etc, and now you've increased time as well which will shred things. From memory when Adrian was drag racing he was running 17psi, on a stock turbo, and running insane speeds. But he also had other additives helping in the setup too. Some people have success at 14psi for a while, while others due to pushing the cars hard for long periods opt down to lower temps. But also, generate a lot of heat (let's say bad tune), for a long time, and you'll be okay, until you try to spin that little guy up slightly. It's the one advantage of dumping a lot of fuel in, you'll be reducing EGT a bit and helping with the heat portion of the above 3 areas.   And these days, stock turbos are that old that there's the possibility of just outright failures due to material age. I'm not shocked that even when used in factory spec that a stock turbo fails when 30 years old. It's a worn out "precision" "balanced" performance item, that's likely no longer precise, or well balanced
    • this... hence I said what I said previously, SMSP nights you see mainly Hondas, Evos, A90s, F80x and the odd VW. The 5 or 6 times I went, I only saw 1x R32 GT-R, and other than that I was the only one in a shit box Skyline.
×
×
  • Create New...