Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

And for people who do not believe street rwd cars can be quick. Nizpro built a 200SX that did a 1:18.6 8 years ago. Still registered that probably weighed near std becaue of the cage etc

LOL, many, many moons ago... from the Maserati website :banana:

At the sharp end of the field it was a bit of an arm wrestle between Mike Roddy in his Jaguar XJS and Simon Gischus in his spectacular Nissan 200SXR...

There were of course quite a number of good performances on the day. 911 GT2 and Greg Lovett (1.22.65) in the Porsche GT3 were closely matched and Ben Derks (1:23.31) in his Nissan GT-R was close behind.

A little further back in the field there were also some good performances....as did Ray Evans in his Nissan 200SX. Times recorded by John Kennedy in the Mitsubishi GTO...were also impressive.

Some familiar names there. Good to see 8 years on that ppl are still playing with cars :banana:

  • Replies 269
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hang on ...300 at the treads and coil overs. So you are allowed a turbo upgrade (two of them) with ECU and exhaust with coil overs to go as fast as you are. But Tim in his GTSt isnt allowed a turbo upgrade and coil overs? :banana: You were also running better Federal tyres then what is on his car.

the point that i was making was you would need to spend more on a gts-t to get it to do a quick time.

for example, you want to run a 1.25 at sandown. you wouldnt have to spend anywhere near as much on a GTR as what would be needed to spend on a gts-t. mainly because the GTR's are already half way there in the performance from factory...

and what do you mean i was on "better" Federal tyres than Tim? how so? :banana:

And for people who do not believe street rwd cars can be quick. Nizpro built a 200SX that did a 1:18.6 8 years ago. Still registered that probably weighed near std becaue of the cage etc

LOL, many, many moons ago... from the Maserati website :banana:

Some familiar names there. Good to see 8 years on that ppl are still playing with cars :banana:

Awesome car... if only mine would be as quick one day!

http://autospeed.com/cms/A_107989/article.html

the point that i was making was you would need to spend more on a gts-t to get it to do a quick time.

for example, you want to run a 1.25 at sandown. you wouldnt have to spend anywhere near as much on a GTR as what would be needed to spend on a gts-t. mainly because the GTR's are already half way there in the performance from factory...

and what do you mean i was on "better" Federal tyres than Tim? how so? :banana:

LOL, its time to rev up more GTR drivers. :banana: When i have seen Tim run he has always had odd from to rear tyres that were nothing special. That may not have been the case, i just assumed so. I guessed when you posted that you ran Federal tyres that they were 595s which are good street tyres, people run them in the street class at Superlap,

I do agree, that an out of the box GTR with bolt on upgrades and coil overs with 250rwkws is a good thing. The only real downside is the inadequate brakes and how hot they run with coolant and oil temps. But they are quick things...didnt Scotsman do a high 1:21 or something with nothing too crazy in the area of bolt ons and still std turbos? That is my target, i hope to be able to do about the same times as a well sorted std turbo/engine GTR in a GTSt with about the same power, ie 250-260rwkws. I am hoping that the low speed traction advantage of the GTR equals out with the better power to weight of the GTSt and better braking and corner speed

I will add that my GTSt did sub 25s with an adpator allowing me to run 324mm rotors, a used turbo setup, Power Fc with the usual exhaust, filter and cooler mods and with off the shelf Whiteline shocks and swaybars. It did a 1.23.1 to br exact using RE55s. So the difference in mods is really the turbo setup and intercooler, easily cheaper then the purcahse price difference between a GTR and GTSt.

LOL, i will defend the broken ass POS GTSt to the death :bunny: Until Aaron, Chris and JFK chime in with the times their near std GTRs did at Sandown and PI then i will go to my cot and have a cry :rofl:

Gah silly argument. GT-Rs and GTS-ts are so different in terms of weight and philosophy! Jack's right about just getting out there and having fun.

Still I'm only down to a 1:26.6 at sandown with 245rwkw reduced by some very average misfiring coil packs. I'm waiting for a drama free run, I can't seem to get one at sandown.

Gah silly argument. GT-Rs and GTS-ts are so different in terms of weight and philosophy! Jack's right about just getting out there and having fun.

There you go. I obviously cant say it better myself as i have been offling on for pages! :P Different cars that are both fun that can achieve similar end.

I was running ok streets at sandown, hankook fronts and used toyo proxies4 on rear.

Keen to see my times once i settle the rear , change a few suspention settings and get semis on there.

And if I cant nip at your pb bris I will be an unhappy boy.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...